Newt Gingrich’s $929 Million in Tweets
“Money is the mother’s milk of politics,” said California State Assembly Speaker, Jesse “Big Daddy” Unruh (1922-1987).
For a politician, the Internet is a huge bargain.
For example, Newt Gingrich, who is flirting with a run for the presidency, has more than 1.3 million followers on Twitter.
Twitter is free. Talking to these million-plus followers—keeping them fired up on a very personal basis—costs Gingrich nothing beyond a bit of his time.
Twenty years ago, he would have been forced to mail postcards. In today’s dollars—at 30¢ a pop—each postcard mailing would cost Gingrich $394,000.
The record shows that Gingrich has sent out 2,363 tweets as of this morning.
If the former speaker had sent all his tweets to his full list, that’s 3 billion tweets. In postcard arithmetic, that totals $929 million worth of messages.
Conventional wisdom—especially amongst politicians and the very young—is that the Internet is a Godsend, because everything is free—news, magazines, books, music, movies, tweets, Facebook, correspondence.
“‘Conventional wisdom’ is an oxymoron,” wrote Charles Hughes and William Jeanes.
In actuality, the Internet—the “new medium” where everything is free—can be a catastrophe. Not only is it an enabler of excruciatingly sloppy, self-indulgent writing that bores people to stupefaction, but it can invade our privacy, get us fired, destroy our reputations and careers, and, in some cases, cause us to commit suicide.
The Media of My Boyhood
The noise that woke me up in the early 1940s was the newspaper delivery guys roaring into the driveway at 6:30 a.m., the THWACK of two newspapers hitting the brick front stoop followed by the squeal of brakes as their panel truck went around the lilac bush circle and then tore out to the street.
The two newspapers were identical copies of The New York Herald Tribune—one each for my father and grandmother. Why didn’t they take a Trib and a New York Times and then switch? Both thought the Times was dull.