Target Marketing

You will be automatically redirected to targetmarketingmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

About the First Paragraph of Your Obituary ...

The ruined life of Charles Van Doren

July 2008 By Denny Hatch
7
Get the Flash Player to see this rotator.
 

In the News

After 49 Years, Charles Van Doren Talks
Finally, Charles Van Doren can talk about “it.” “It” is his career-ending involvement in the great quiz show scandal of 1959, which reduced him from a glamorous Time magazine cover boy and “Today” show regular to tabloid humiliation as one of the most reviled men in America. After pleading guilty to perjury for lying to a grand jury about the rigged NBC game show, “Twenty One,” Van Doren confessed at a congressional hearing in October 1959. “I was involved, deeply involved, in a deception,” Van Doren told Congress. “I have deceived my friends, and I had millions of them.” The day he testified, he lost his jobs at NBC and at Columbia University.
Alex Beam, International Herald Tribune, July 21, 2008
Last week, I picked up the July 28 issue of The New Yorker and was fascinated to see a story titled: “All the Answers: The quiz-show scandals—and the aftermath,” by Charles Van Doren.

For 50 years, Charles Van Doren has been consigned to living hell. He’s one of the few notable Americans (along with Bill Clinton) who knows that he screwed up so badly that the first paragraph of his obituary will deal with a major scandal rather than his accomplishments. Three examples of unfortunate first paragraphs:

Richard M. Nixon, the 37th president of the United States—a polarizing figure who won a record landslide and resigned in disgrace 21 months later—died last night in a New York City hospital four days after suffering a stroke. He was 81.
The Washington Post, April 23, 1994

Spiro T. Agnew, the tart-tongued political combatant who fired up the American electorate but then had to resign as Richard M. Nixon’s vice president in the face of a kickback scandal, died on Tuesday at the age of 77.
The New York Times, Sept. 19, 1996

Col. Aaron Burr, died at Staten Island, on Tuesday afternoon the 13th inst. In the 81st year of his age. Few men in this country have excited more of the public attention than the deceased, in despite of the dark cloud which shrouded his once fair fame; for all admired the bravery and talents which rendered him such an important auxiliary in the early struggles of our country, and lamented that they were perverted by unhallowed ambition.
Niles’ Weekly, Baltimore, Sept. 17, 1836

Van Doren was a lovely guy. It didn’t have to happen.

A Sad Memory ...
Van Doren’s confession in The New Yorker was, for me, yet another bite into a Proustian madeleine cake.

In 1956, I was a student at Columbia College and working part time as a page at the NBC television studios. One day after squeezing fat tourists into thin seats for the daytime quiz show, “Tic-Tac-Dough,” I was astonished to see my English teacher, Charles Van Doren, walk on stage and be introduced by host Jack Barry as one of the contestants.

Charles Van Doren’s father, Mark, was a renowned poet, critic and Columbia professor of literature. His uncle, Carl Van Doren, won the 1939 Pulitzer Prize for his biography of Benjamin Franklin. Carl’s ex-wife, Irita Van Doren, was literary editor of The New York Herald Tribune. The Van Dorens were American literati aristocrats.

Takeaway Points to Consider:

* All of us have been tempted by attractive offers that could compromise our integrity. Before saying yes, think about the first paragraph of your obituary.

* It may seem fanciful to equate Charles Van Doren’s career to that of Richard Nixon, Spiro Agnew and Aaron Burr. But in the 50s, he was an American icon beloved and admired by millions and held up to children as a role model.

* Helping a child make sense of Charles Van Doren’s crash and burn was more painful than explaining Pee-Wee Herman’s 1991 arrest for public masturbation at an adult movie house while watching the XXX-rated film, “Nurse Nancy.” After all, Pee Wee Herman was weird to start with, while Van Doren was a straight arrow—the ideal son.

* Right now, residing in jails around the country is a gaggle of greedy executives whose ruined lives will be summed up in the first paragraph of their obituaries. Example:

Kenneth L. Lay, the son of a Baptist preacher in rural Missouri who rose to the pinnacle of corporate America as head of Enron before becoming a symbol of corporate excess, died yesterday in Aspen, Colo. He was 64.
The New York Times, July 6, 2005

* I am reminded of the great American wit and playwright George S. Kaufman, who was a championship bridge player and frequented the Regency and Cavendish clubs in New York. At one point Kaufman became apoplectic at how badly his partner had played a hand. “How would you have played it?” the man asked balefully as the cards were being shuffled. “Under an assumed name,” snapped Kaufman. If I were Charles Van Doren, I might well have opted to spend the rest of my life under an assumed name.

Web Sites Related to Today's Edition:

Prepared Statement Read by Charles Van Doren to the House Committee, Nov. 2, 1959
http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/6566/

Full Testimony and Follow-up Questions by the House Committee, Nov. 2, 1959
(requires a $3.95 fee to nonsubscribers to The New York Times)
http://tinyurl.com/6ggg7d

“Twenty-One”—Charles Van Doren, Jack Barry & Herb Stempel
http://tinyurl.com/5sp5ml

“Time and Again,” NBC Documentary on Quiz Shows
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcVK8BDZT9Y

Janet Maslin’s Review of “Quiz Show” in The New York Times
http://tinyurl.com/5wlgs4
 
7

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Peter Rosenwald - Posted on July 30, 2008
Another wonderful piece, Denny. One footnote: Richard Goodwin in addition to being his historian wife's husband, went on to become one of JFK's chief and (with Ted Sorenson) best speech writers. A real humanist, my guess is Goodwin had a warm spot for Van Doren despite his drive to do his job as a prosecutor. Peter
Peter Hochstein - Posted on July 29, 2008
Denny, While I agree that what we do will affect the obits about us (Mine will probably say, "Peter Who?") I continue to be puzzled ? as it was over 50 years ago ? by the outrage over Van Doren. What tangible harm did his deception do? Unlike the case of Ken Lay, or many other "deceivers," no member of the public got gulled out of a nickel, was talked into making or retaining a bad investment, tumbled into a life of crime, or ran amok committing rape and mayhem because of Van Doren's performance. Would that the same could be said of some politicians and business leaders who speak with forked tongues. As in the case of James Frey, all Van Doren did was entertain a willing audience. So he made it up! So did Shakespeare and Dickens. Where's the beef?
Fred Lederman - Posted on July 29, 2008
Thank you for another good lesson on life and business. Life is about the choices people make. All of your readers make choices and have to live with the results. A jaundiced observer of business in today?s tough economic times might even call this the ?never ending battle for truth, justice and the American way?. Yes, that is the closing line from the 1950?s TV series ?The Adventures of Superman? starring George Reeves. In 1959, just prior to Van Doren?s day of reckoning, a front-page obit was written in the New York Post stating, ?TV?S SUPERMAN KILLS SELF?. Consider some of today?s entertainment with the ever-increasing series of reality TV. The line between fiction and reality is blurred. So, too, is news reporting which is more views than news. ?Twenty-One? was a forerunner of today?s TV shows. It was a game show that emerged in America following WWII. At that time, education was critically important. In the pre-Internet world, TV was a form of education and ?Twenty-One? provided an eager audience with new information. Was it so wrong to provide answers and entertainment? Six years later ?Hollywood Squares? was launched where entertainers were provided answers and zingers to questions. Did Congress investigate Rose Marie or Morey Amsterdam? Van Doren was considered an esteemed intellectual as opposed to an entertainer who became the unfortunate scapegoat for a bored and ?do-nothing? Congress. To quote Jimmy Olsen, "Golly, Mr. Kent, you'll never know how wonderful it is to be like Superman." George Reeves (as Clark Kent) responds, "No, Jimmy, I guess I never will." Final Episode, The Adventures of Superman.
PamG - Posted on July 29, 2008
I've always been fascinated by this story, and was thrilled when the movie (which I loved) came out. It's nice to hear about it from someone who was there. And Eric, he said he "picked up" a copy. No mention of a continuing subscription. Maybe it was in his dentist's waiting room. ;)
Tim - Posted on July 29, 2008
The VanDoren incident was just another example of America's loss of innocence. (BTW... when are we no longer innocent???) I was just a bebe when this occurred so I can't really judge the impact it really had on society. However, I look at VanDoren as a pioneer...of the current day reality show! All fixed, planned, scripted, etc.... and we viewers, think its REAL??? Again I asks the question... when are we no longer innocent??? I appreciate your warning about our own obituary...although frankly I will be gone so I wont care much what an obit writer says about me.
Eric - Posted on July 29, 2008
Didn't you just tell us after the Obama cover debacle that you were cancelling your subscription to the New Yorker, that it was no longer worthy of your time and attention to read after many years of being a subscriber? That is a fairly quick reversal of your personal decission isn't it? It's also fitting for this articles topic, not?
Lee Marc Stein - Posted on July 29, 2008
Great point about the first paragraph of one's obit. What will they say about Bush and Cheney?

You are making the assumption that Kenneth Lay died. I think he used WMDs (Weapons of Mortality Deception) and is living in Buenos Aires.

My father died in 1958. He would stand in front of the TV and yell "Fix!" when CVD appeared. Everyone in the neighborhood ostracized him for that.
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Peter Rosenwald - Posted on July 30, 2008
Another wonderful piece, Denny. One footnote: Richard Goodwin in addition to being his historian wife's husband, went on to become one of JFK's chief and (with Ted Sorenson) best speech writers. A real humanist, my guess is Goodwin had a warm spot for Van Doren despite his drive to do his job as a prosecutor. Peter
Peter Hochstein - Posted on July 29, 2008
Denny, While I agree that what we do will affect the obits about us (Mine will probably say, "Peter Who?") I continue to be puzzled ? as it was over 50 years ago ? by the outrage over Van Doren. What tangible harm did his deception do? Unlike the case of Ken Lay, or many other "deceivers," no member of the public got gulled out of a nickel, was talked into making or retaining a bad investment, tumbled into a life of crime, or ran amok committing rape and mayhem because of Van Doren's performance. Would that the same could be said of some politicians and business leaders who speak with forked tongues. As in the case of James Frey, all Van Doren did was entertain a willing audience. So he made it up! So did Shakespeare and Dickens. Where's the beef?
Fred Lederman - Posted on July 29, 2008
Thank you for another good lesson on life and business. Life is about the choices people make. All of your readers make choices and have to live with the results. A jaundiced observer of business in today?s tough economic times might even call this the ?never ending battle for truth, justice and the American way?. Yes, that is the closing line from the 1950?s TV series ?The Adventures of Superman? starring George Reeves. In 1959, just prior to Van Doren?s day of reckoning, a front-page obit was written in the New York Post stating, ?TV?S SUPERMAN KILLS SELF?. Consider some of today?s entertainment with the ever-increasing series of reality TV. The line between fiction and reality is blurred. So, too, is news reporting which is more views than news. ?Twenty-One? was a forerunner of today?s TV shows. It was a game show that emerged in America following WWII. At that time, education was critically important. In the pre-Internet world, TV was a form of education and ?Twenty-One? provided an eager audience with new information. Was it so wrong to provide answers and entertainment? Six years later ?Hollywood Squares? was launched where entertainers were provided answers and zingers to questions. Did Congress investigate Rose Marie or Morey Amsterdam? Van Doren was considered an esteemed intellectual as opposed to an entertainer who became the unfortunate scapegoat for a bored and ?do-nothing? Congress. To quote Jimmy Olsen, "Golly, Mr. Kent, you'll never know how wonderful it is to be like Superman." George Reeves (as Clark Kent) responds, "No, Jimmy, I guess I never will." Final Episode, The Adventures of Superman.
PamG - Posted on July 29, 2008
I've always been fascinated by this story, and was thrilled when the movie (which I loved) came out. It's nice to hear about it from someone who was there. And Eric, he said he "picked up" a copy. No mention of a continuing subscription. Maybe it was in his dentist's waiting room. ;)
Tim - Posted on July 29, 2008
The VanDoren incident was just another example of America's loss of innocence. (BTW... when are we no longer innocent???) I was just a bebe when this occurred so I can't really judge the impact it really had on society. However, I look at VanDoren as a pioneer...of the current day reality show! All fixed, planned, scripted, etc.... and we viewers, think its REAL??? Again I asks the question... when are we no longer innocent??? I appreciate your warning about our own obituary...although frankly I will be gone so I wont care much what an obit writer says about me.
Eric - Posted on July 29, 2008
Didn't you just tell us after the Obama cover debacle that you were cancelling your subscription to the New Yorker, that it was no longer worthy of your time and attention to read after many years of being a subscriber? That is a fairly quick reversal of your personal decission isn't it? It's also fitting for this articles topic, not?
Lee Marc Stein - Posted on July 29, 2008
Great point about the first paragraph of one's obit. What will they say about Bush and Cheney?

You are making the assumption that Kenneth Lay died. I think he used WMDs (Weapons of Mortality Deception) and is living in Buenos Aires.

My father died in 1958. He would stand in front of the TV and yell "Fix!" when CVD appeared. Everyone in the neighborhood ostracized him for that.