Target Marketing

You will be automatically redirected to targetmarketingmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

How to Communicate via E-mail

The Perils of Landing Page Limbo

November 2006 By Denny Hatch
10

In the News

BTL Monthly
Personal letter from the CEO of Titan Holdings (TTGL) as they anticipate higher profit margins … Thu Nov 02, 2006 23k
—From Denny Hatch’s Yahoo Inbox, Nov. 3, 2006
I never open “personal letters” from strangers in my Yahoo or AOL inbox. Too often, they’re the Nigeria scam or a pitch for Viagra.

But the following subject line intrigued me: “Personal letter from the CEO of Titan Holdings (TTGL) as they anticipate …”

I can’t recall ever receiving a personal letter from a CEO. My ego was stroked.

Even though I’d never heard of Titan Holdings—and knowing it was most probably Spam—I clicked on it to see this “personal letter.”

There was nothing personal about it.

And therein lies the problem with e-mail and e-commerce.

Remembering the Dot-com Boom
In 1999, a serial entrepreneur named Jay Walker had just taken his priceline.com public, and was honored as Direct Marketer of the Year at the Direct Marketing Days New York conference at the Hilton. The acceptance speech was a stem-winder. In the words of Direct’s Thom Weidlich:

Walker envisioned a tomorrow where so many things Direct Marketers are used to paying massively for—postage, paper, printing, lettershop services, toll-free calls—will be free because they will be taken care of on the Internet. In addition, direct marketers will hold no inventory, and pre-press costs will drop 90% (and the work will take 15 minutes), Walker predicted.

Walker’s message wasn’t happy news for printers, paper and envelope salesmen, list owners and proprietors of lettershops—all of whom paid handsomely to attend the luncheon. At the conclusion of Walker’s talk, all of us in the audience were ready to slash our collective wrists.

Fast forward to Nov. 2, 2006. In a New York Times story titled “Junk Mail Is Alive and Growing,” Louise Story reported that last year, marketers sent more than 114 billion direct mailings—catalogs, envelope efforts, self-mailers and postcards—a 15 percent increase over five years ago.

And most of the dot-com prodigies from 1998-2000 are in another line of work.

What Happened?
When the Internet began to take off, the techie twenty-somethings that reigned supreme called it “a new paradigm”—a new medium that required new rules. Actually, they operated without rules.

When a marketer undertakes a direct mail campaign, the cost will run roughly $500 to $750 per thousand—or 50 cents to 75 cents apiece. As a result, direct mailers are disciplined and very careful. They know the rules and follow them slavishly. When rules are broken, they know precisely what rules they are breaking and why. Otherwise, they will lose a lot of money quickly.

Takeaway Points to Consider:

* In planning an e-mail campaign, decide precisely what action you want from the recipients, get inside their heads and figure out the information that they will need to respond. Don’t give them too much. “Confuse ‘em, ya lose ‘em,” said guru consultant Paul Goldberg.

* For your e-mail to get opened, the subject line is everything.

* A letter is different from a brochure is different from an order mechanism is different from a lift note. This is true in e-commerce as well as direct mail. If everything looks alike, the power of your words is lost in the dreary sameness of it all.

* Design is the stage setting for your words. Words sell. Design doesn’t. Don’t allow the designer to dominate.

* Don’t automatically include a Web site on a mailing piece or off-the-page advertisement. Rather, test it with and without. The reason: If you’ve made a persuasive argument and the prospects are about to respond, they will be distracted by a URL. Their concentration will be broken and they will think, “Ah, maybe I should look at the Web site first.” Whereupon the mailing or ad is laid aside and you have lost the response.

* “Make it easy to order,” said Elsworth Howell, founder of Grolier Enterprises. If your mailing piece or ad sends responders to a Web site, create a special URL that takes them to a page directly relating to the message that they have just seen. Many marketers simply list the generic homepage, whereupon responders are consigned to roaming around Landing Page Limbo, and you have lost the order, donation or inquiry.

* When was the last time you took a critical look at your home page/landing page? Does that dog hunt? Or has it been screwed around with by so many people that it has become Landing Page Limbo?

Web Sites Related to Today's Edition:

The Text (not the Design) of the Titan “Personal Letter” E-mail
http://tinyurl.com/y5bzev/

Titan Global Holdings
http://www.titanglobalholdings.com/
 
10

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Lea Pierce - Posted on November 15, 2006
P.S. My new corollary to "all direct mail gets opened over the trash can" is "all email gets opened over the delete button."
Lea Pierce - Posted on November 15, 2006
As usual, I find myself nodding "yes... yes... yes" to your comments, Denny, especially: "Using Web tracking software, you can amass a wealth of test information in three hours that would normally take two years to collect using snail mail?and at 1/100,000th of the cost.>

My gripe is that, with a couple of bright-spot exceptions who take e-commerce very seriously and are doing very well, I keep running into clients who will not take the time to really leverage the incredible testing power of the web. We can test, literally, punctuation if we want to. What I see is a lot of lazyness... clients who want a "magic bullet" email as they want a "magic bullet" letter that will cost nothing, pull like crazy, and never wear out. The truth, as you point out, is that e-dm is every bit as demanding and technique-intensive as snail-dm. Hershell Gordon Lewis' maxim of "verisimillitude" holds just as true in e-dm, and a "personal message from..." subject line better deliver a personal message.

I do have one quibble, which is "Design is the stage setting for your words. Words sell. Design doesn?t. Don?t allow the designer to dominate."

As with snail-dm, if the words are poorly designed, readership goes down. I think this factor -- sheer visual readability -- is even more critical on the web. So while I agree that designers should never dominate, I find myself working even more closely with designers who "get it" to create sales messages that are fast reads,compelling, and make saying "YES, TAKE MY MONEY' quick and seamless.

Thanks again for another pungent, timely, incisive chunk o' common sense!

Lea Pierce
David Frey - Posted on November 08, 2006
Hi Denny:

This is David Frey over at http://www.MarketingBestPractices.com

In your recent newsletter about email marketing you mention
the importance of NOT showing your website address with
your phone number as a primary response mechanism.

In my personal tests, my leads dropped by 50% when I displayed
my URL and my phone number. When I took my URL off, my
lead flow went back to normal.

I think putting a website address on the ad gives your prospect
the "path of least resistance" to get more information and they
get lost between the time they looked at the ad and when they
went to the website.

Good call Denny. :-)

David
Anthony Green - Posted on November 08, 2006
Denny,
You are so 'spot on' with this one! We use our best efforts to hold the reader?s attention in a mailing or off-page ad. We bring them to fever pitch with our words and offer and then say, ?Hold it! Why not check out our web site: www.youvejustlostthatorder.com?. And what are the chances that they will be reading your piece while sitting in front of their computer? It doesn?t make sense and goes against the grain of everything in the salesman?s rule book! It?s kamikaze mail order! If the offer is that good they?ll pick up the phone. The only thing I have yet to work out is what reason to give for not having a URL. It?s bound to create the wrong impression. Any ideas on that one?
You are, as always, an inspiration and always live up to the title of your newsletter. Keep up the good work.
Best wishes,
Anthony Green.

Rick Olson - Posted on November 07, 2006
I recieved a direct mail piece once that contained a "personal letter" from the CEO. Of course it was mass-personal, but it was signed and I used it as an entre to call on that CEO personally. I simply told his secretary that I was getting back to him from a personal letter I'd received and I was put right through (much to my surprise, I might add). The guy was a bit annoyed at my tactic but admitted it was fair and we got a chuckle out of it at least. I never got the deal but I did get through.
Dev. Kinney - Posted on November 07, 2006
Enjoyed this skread immensely, Denny. Your didactics are why MediaGraphics has always captured market share for our clients. Keep up the good work.
--Dev.
Carl Street - Posted on November 07, 2006
Is a hammer better than a screwdriver?

Depends upon what you need to accomplish. Marketing communication tasks run the gamut of simple "gee whiz" notices to complete fullfillment (consumated sales). Throughout that spectrum different strategies and tactics are necessary based upon the objective. In short, one design does NOT fit all and copy, design, media, etc. should be as carefully chosen as any skilled craftsman chooses his tools. Even in the "free" Email world, failed campaings have at least an opporunity cost; probably damage corporate images; and can be real well poisoners. The REAL Cost of failed marketing communications has rarely, if ever, been the cost of producing and delivering the message.

In today's competitive environment, marketing communications are NOT a playground for amateurs -- just because they lack a distribution cost. Any CEO/CFO who believes otherwise should transfer immediately to his building maintenance department before he puts his ship up on a reef. Hire a pro with a successful track record -- anything less is false economy.

Carl Street
carl_street@cjstreet.com
David Garfinkel - Posted on November 07, 2006
Once again, you hit the obvious. Except, it's not so obvious. It SHOULD be obvious, but very few people "get" how to create email messages that work.

Truth told, it's no different than writing a really well crafted direct mail letter. There's definitely skill (and not having a 'tin ear') involved in writing a message to the masses that comes across as personal to the reader.

But that's step two. Step one is for it to occur to the person writing that there needs to be congruence and emotional connection between the promise in the subject line and the delievered content in the body of the email. Most people don't even "get" that.

It's a shame... but... it's a bonanza for the few who do understand.
Larry Maher - Posted on November 07, 2006
Denny,

Thank you. This is the best summary of all that is right and wrong with e-mail marketing I have read in a long time. I am going to select a few choice portions and use them in my e-commerce and website design meeting tomorrow afternoon.
Your points are well documented, especially with the quotes from long-time experts in Direct Marketing and tie-ins with hard-copy rules. Keep up the good work!
John Fabian - Posted on November 07, 2006
Direct mail costs $50 - $75/M? Maybe in 1970, when 3rd class mail was 3.8 cents. Better proof that copy more carefully, Denny (BG).

Your comment about how traditional DM gets opened made me recall a story the late Bill Jayme told me years ago. He was on a cross-country flight and saw this man take one the mailings that Bill had created out of his briefcase. Bill thought, "Aha, at last I'm going to see what people actually look at first when they open a mailing... the letter, the brochure or the order form."

Whereupon the man opened the envelope, set aside the letter and brochure, looked at the BRC... and used it to clean his teeth (true story!!!)

John Fabian
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Lea Pierce - Posted on November 15, 2006
P.S. My new corollary to "all direct mail gets opened over the trash can" is "all email gets opened over the delete button."
Lea Pierce - Posted on November 15, 2006
As usual, I find myself nodding "yes... yes... yes" to your comments, Denny, especially: "Using Web tracking software, you can amass a wealth of test information in three hours that would normally take two years to collect using snail mail?and at 1/100,000th of the cost.>

My gripe is that, with a couple of bright-spot exceptions who take e-commerce very seriously and are doing very well, I keep running into clients who will not take the time to really leverage the incredible testing power of the web. We can test, literally, punctuation if we want to. What I see is a lot of lazyness... clients who want a "magic bullet" email as they want a "magic bullet" letter that will cost nothing, pull like crazy, and never wear out. The truth, as you point out, is that e-dm is every bit as demanding and technique-intensive as snail-dm. Hershell Gordon Lewis' maxim of "verisimillitude" holds just as true in e-dm, and a "personal message from..." subject line better deliver a personal message.

I do have one quibble, which is "Design is the stage setting for your words. Words sell. Design doesn?t. Don?t allow the designer to dominate."

As with snail-dm, if the words are poorly designed, readership goes down. I think this factor -- sheer visual readability -- is even more critical on the web. So while I agree that designers should never dominate, I find myself working even more closely with designers who "get it" to create sales messages that are fast reads,compelling, and make saying "YES, TAKE MY MONEY' quick and seamless.

Thanks again for another pungent, timely, incisive chunk o' common sense!

Lea Pierce
David Frey - Posted on November 08, 2006
Hi Denny:

This is David Frey over at http://www.MarketingBestPractices.com

In your recent newsletter about email marketing you mention
the importance of NOT showing your website address with
your phone number as a primary response mechanism.

In my personal tests, my leads dropped by 50% when I displayed
my URL and my phone number. When I took my URL off, my
lead flow went back to normal.

I think putting a website address on the ad gives your prospect
the "path of least resistance" to get more information and they
get lost between the time they looked at the ad and when they
went to the website.

Good call Denny. :-)

David
Anthony Green - Posted on November 08, 2006
Denny,
You are so 'spot on' with this one! We use our best efforts to hold the reader?s attention in a mailing or off-page ad. We bring them to fever pitch with our words and offer and then say, ?Hold it! Why not check out our web site: www.youvejustlostthatorder.com?. And what are the chances that they will be reading your piece while sitting in front of their computer? It doesn?t make sense and goes against the grain of everything in the salesman?s rule book! It?s kamikaze mail order! If the offer is that good they?ll pick up the phone. The only thing I have yet to work out is what reason to give for not having a URL. It?s bound to create the wrong impression. Any ideas on that one?
You are, as always, an inspiration and always live up to the title of your newsletter. Keep up the good work.
Best wishes,
Anthony Green.

Rick Olson - Posted on November 07, 2006
I recieved a direct mail piece once that contained a "personal letter" from the CEO. Of course it was mass-personal, but it was signed and I used it as an entre to call on that CEO personally. I simply told his secretary that I was getting back to him from a personal letter I'd received and I was put right through (much to my surprise, I might add). The guy was a bit annoyed at my tactic but admitted it was fair and we got a chuckle out of it at least. I never got the deal but I did get through.
Dev. Kinney - Posted on November 07, 2006
Enjoyed this skread immensely, Denny. Your didactics are why MediaGraphics has always captured market share for our clients. Keep up the good work.
--Dev.
Carl Street - Posted on November 07, 2006
Is a hammer better than a screwdriver?

Depends upon what you need to accomplish. Marketing communication tasks run the gamut of simple "gee whiz" notices to complete fullfillment (consumated sales). Throughout that spectrum different strategies and tactics are necessary based upon the objective. In short, one design does NOT fit all and copy, design, media, etc. should be as carefully chosen as any skilled craftsman chooses his tools. Even in the "free" Email world, failed campaings have at least an opporunity cost; probably damage corporate images; and can be real well poisoners. The REAL Cost of failed marketing communications has rarely, if ever, been the cost of producing and delivering the message.

In today's competitive environment, marketing communications are NOT a playground for amateurs -- just because they lack a distribution cost. Any CEO/CFO who believes otherwise should transfer immediately to his building maintenance department before he puts his ship up on a reef. Hire a pro with a successful track record -- anything less is false economy.

Carl Street
carl_street@cjstreet.com
David Garfinkel - Posted on November 07, 2006
Once again, you hit the obvious. Except, it's not so obvious. It SHOULD be obvious, but very few people "get" how to create email messages that work.

Truth told, it's no different than writing a really well crafted direct mail letter. There's definitely skill (and not having a 'tin ear') involved in writing a message to the masses that comes across as personal to the reader.

But that's step two. Step one is for it to occur to the person writing that there needs to be congruence and emotional connection between the promise in the subject line and the delievered content in the body of the email. Most people don't even "get" that.

It's a shame... but... it's a bonanza for the few who do understand.
Larry Maher - Posted on November 07, 2006
Denny,

Thank you. This is the best summary of all that is right and wrong with e-mail marketing I have read in a long time. I am going to select a few choice portions and use them in my e-commerce and website design meeting tomorrow afternoon.
Your points are well documented, especially with the quotes from long-time experts in Direct Marketing and tie-ins with hard-copy rules. Keep up the good work!
John Fabian - Posted on November 07, 2006
Direct mail costs $50 - $75/M? Maybe in 1970, when 3rd class mail was 3.8 cents. Better proof that copy more carefully, Denny (BG).

Your comment about how traditional DM gets opened made me recall a story the late Bill Jayme told me years ago. He was on a cross-country flight and saw this man take one the mailings that Bill had created out of his briefcase. Bill thought, "Aha, at last I'm going to see what people actually look at first when they open a mailing... the letter, the brochure or the order form."

Whereupon the man opened the envelope, set aside the letter and brochure, looked at the BRC... and used it to clean his teeth (true story!!!)

John Fabian