Advertisement
 
 

Obama's $750 Million Juggernaut

In the beginning was Walter, now the two Davids

Vol. 4, Issue No. 69 | December 16, 2008 By Denny Hatch
9
Get the Flash Player to see this rotator.
 

IN THE NEWS

Final Fundraising Figure: Obama's $750MM
Obama's Money Was Three Times as Much as McCain in General Election

He was not quite the first $1 billion president — but he was three quarters of the way there. In 21-plus months, Barack Obama raised roughly $750 million from donors, surpassing all of his White House opponents this year and also eclipsing the total amount of money raised by all of the presidential candidates combined in 2004. ... The Obama campaign finished the reporting period sitting on $30 million. It's not clear how that money will be used. Plus, the Obama campaign advises it expects its total amount of money to increase when cash from the Obama Victory Fund comes in. The campaign reports more than $770 million in total receipts.

—Tahman Bradley, ABC News, Dec. 5, 2008


The two Davids—Axlerod and Plouffe—are marketing geniuses. They propelled Barack Obama to the presidency by running textbook campaigns in the primaries and general election.

In the course of their work, they raised three-quarters of a billion dollars, upended the entire business of political fundraising and scotched forever the Holy American Empire’s concept of taxpayer-funded elections.

How’d they do it?

I have in my archive 187 e-mails from the Obama campaign to me (from 3/5/08 – 12/9/08) and 207 messages from the Hillary Clinton press office to me (from 3/11/08 – 5/9/08).

This is grist for a book or white paper on what Obama did right and Clinton did wrong—especially since the presumptive secretary of state is in the hole for $30 million and is whining and begging, while the president-elect is sitting on a $30 million surplus.

As readers of this e-zine know, history fascinates me. And for three and a half years, I had the enormous privilege of working for Walter Weintz, the father of direct mail political fundraising.

What follows is the story of how it all began. The pioneering work in political fundraising by Walter Weintz in the 1950s is directly applicable to the world of fundraising today—more than a half-century later—whether you use snail mail, e-mail, off-the-page advertising or the telephone.

How the National Republican Party's Winning Fund-Raising Program Was Built — By Walter H. Weintz (Former circulation director, Reader’s Digest)

From “The Solid Gold Mailbox” by Walter Weintz (John Wiley & Sons, 1987). Reprinted by permission of Todd Weintz.

Once the basic principles and techniques of mail-order promotion are understood, they can be applied in the most unlikely places, and for unexpected products. Although my own initial mail-order experience happened to do with magazines and books, the same rules would have applied had I been working on a correspondence course in accounting, the mail-order sale of Christmas hams or Chesapeake crabmeat, securing leads for Ford cars, or, indeed, getting political candidates elected or fund raising for a political organization like the Republican National Committee.

As it happens, I discovered through personal experience how effectively mail-order procedures can be applied to politics. So, in this chapter I'll go through the story of the development of the National Republican Party's elective and fund raising program, which I helped develop and execute. I believe that the procedures we set up for the Republicans can be applied to any good mail-order product.

Takeaway Points to Consider

  • There were several important lessons to be learned from our experiences with the tests and mailings for Sen. Taft, for Gen. Eisenhower, and for the Republican Party itself in the years while Eisenhower was President.
  • We proved that political appeals can be tested—just like sales appeals for any other product. And we substituted test results for opinions, in the cases of both Sen. Taft and Gen. Eisenhower.
  • We discovered that we could make such tests, and subsequent rollout mailings, self-financing.
  • We had found a way (in the guise of fund-raising) to influence millions of voters through self-financing mail order appeals.
  • We had evolved a method of getting many voters to "bet on a horse"—that is, contribute money to a candidate—which made it much more likely that those voters would indeed get out and vote for the candidate of their choice.
  • And, finally, we'd established a way to secure the names of hundreds of thousands of supporters—people who could be counted upon to contribute to our cause in response to future appeals. We had that most precious of all mail order possessions: a list of customers!
  • The final Eisenhower letter, which I wrote, put all these elements together, and produced the desired effect: $1 million in contributions. With established mail order basics at our service, raising that $1 million was a simple matter. It took only one letter!

Web Sites Related to Today's Edition

Walter Weintz Obituary, New York Times, Dec. 25, 1996
http://tinyurl.com/63yavs

“The Solid Gold Mailbox” by Walter H. Weintz
http://tinyurl.com/69pquf


 

Companies Mentioned:

9

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Robert - Posted on December 16, 2008
David - Posted on December 16, 2008
Barry Hussein overwhelmed McCain monetarily; what he declared, $770 million, ignores money used to elect him from ACORN and a flock of other leftist organizations, some of them controlled by George Soros, and much of the money coming from Arab countries. In addition, Obama received priceless support from almost all the mainstream media. What was that worth?!
David Amkraut - Posted on December 16, 2008
Great direct marketing is built on the bedrock of human psychology and behavior. That is why dm can be used for political campaigns, charitable campaigns and everything else, though some details have to be different.

I enjoyed Walter Weintz's book and keep it handy next to Claude Hopkins, Maxwell Sackheim, and my other favorites.
Tom Cannon - Posted on December 16, 2008
Denny,
Great article and I will be tracking down Walter Weitz's book! The Mighty Eighth Air Force Museum's supporters live all over the country, and your article not only gives me a guide to connecting with them but with developing new supporters as our WW II veterans pass from the scene. Thank you so much! When you're in Savannah come by and I'll give you the nickel tour; it's a special place and I think you'll enjoy it.
Tom
PS: We're getting a B-17 from the Smithsonian in January after 15 years of looking!
Rob - Posted on December 16, 2008
A few years ago, I was interviewing for jobs in DM, mainly subscriptions. I was amazed at how few maketers ran their response reports as I did a t the time, showing projected renewal income over time. They were counting lists that didn't break even in the initial response as a loss, in effect leaving money on the table by not pursuing lists that could pay off in year 2 and beyond.
Wash Phillips - Posted on December 16, 2008
Gee, Denny,
Looks like this installment has taken your occasional critics (re: pieces about OTHER than DM/DR) off the table: I see no gripes so far. And in doing so, you've brought up a golden standard text for the pros in this game. Or are readers just to weather-bound to respond?. (Darn that Global Warming!).
Thanks again and Happy Holidays.
Bernie Malonson - Posted on December 16, 2008
I actually have a copy of the Solid Gold Mailbox on my bookshelf. In a world full of hype on how to be a great marketer or copywriter, it is the classic that I cherish most. Great book and one that should go back into print.
George Whitbread - Posted on December 16, 2008
A great article. Earlier this year I finished a 3 1/2 year gig at a not for profit that generated about $5M gross and $3M net annually, all in small donations (average around $30). Somebody at the top decided this was chump change and virtually shut the operation down (including me) at the beginning of the year. They figured anyone could do the DM thing, and it wasn't that important.

In the meantime as the "R"-word came into the lexicon, the larger corporate donors and sponsors backed off or dramatically reduced their gives. And, dialogue with the donor base and individual donors had been disrupted, if not entirely severed.

Suddenly that $3 million net is pretty well not there and I understand it's back to panic stations and the blind leading the blind.

Sometimes "smart" people can be really, really dumb.

I remember being told in the early 1970s: "Direct mail can be a high-risk, high-yield proposition. But if you're smart, it can be high-yield, without the risk, as long as you know how to test".
Rebecca Hauptman - Posted on December 16, 2008
After reading this article the book "The Long Tail" immediately came to mind. Sure, those contributions were small on average -- but when you add (or multiply) them up, they become significant.

Thanks for the article.
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Robert - Posted on December 16, 2008
David - Posted on December 16, 2008
Barry Hussein overwhelmed McCain monetarily; what he declared, $770 million, ignores money used to elect him from ACORN and a flock of other leftist organizations, some of them controlled by George Soros, and much of the money coming from Arab countries. In addition, Obama received priceless support from almost all the mainstream media. What was that worth?!
David Amkraut - Posted on December 16, 2008
Great direct marketing is built on the bedrock of human psychology and behavior. That is why dm can be used for political campaigns, charitable campaigns and everything else, though some details have to be different.

I enjoyed Walter Weintz's book and keep it handy next to Claude Hopkins, Maxwell Sackheim, and my other favorites.
Tom Cannon - Posted on December 16, 2008
Denny,
Great article and I will be tracking down Walter Weitz's book! The Mighty Eighth Air Force Museum's supporters live all over the country, and your article not only gives me a guide to connecting with them but with developing new supporters as our WW II veterans pass from the scene. Thank you so much! When you're in Savannah come by and I'll give you the nickel tour; it's a special place and I think you'll enjoy it.
Tom
PS: We're getting a B-17 from the Smithsonian in January after 15 years of looking!
Rob - Posted on December 16, 2008
A few years ago, I was interviewing for jobs in DM, mainly subscriptions. I was amazed at how few maketers ran their response reports as I did a t the time, showing projected renewal income over time. They were counting lists that didn't break even in the initial response as a loss, in effect leaving money on the table by not pursuing lists that could pay off in year 2 and beyond.
Wash Phillips - Posted on December 16, 2008
Gee, Denny,
Looks like this installment has taken your occasional critics (re: pieces about OTHER than DM/DR) off the table: I see no gripes so far. And in doing so, you've brought up a golden standard text for the pros in this game. Or are readers just to weather-bound to respond?. (Darn that Global Warming!).
Thanks again and Happy Holidays.
Bernie Malonson - Posted on December 16, 2008
I actually have a copy of the Solid Gold Mailbox on my bookshelf. In a world full of hype on how to be a great marketer or copywriter, it is the classic that I cherish most. Great book and one that should go back into print.
George Whitbread - Posted on December 16, 2008
A great article. Earlier this year I finished a 3 1/2 year gig at a not for profit that generated about $5M gross and $3M net annually, all in small donations (average around $30). Somebody at the top decided this was chump change and virtually shut the operation down (including me) at the beginning of the year. They figured anyone could do the DM thing, and it wasn't that important.

In the meantime as the "R"-word came into the lexicon, the larger corporate donors and sponsors backed off or dramatically reduced their gives. And, dialogue with the donor base and individual donors had been disrupted, if not entirely severed.

Suddenly that $3 million net is pretty well not there and I understand it's back to panic stations and the blind leading the blind.

Sometimes "smart" people can be really, really dumb.

I remember being told in the early 1970s: "Direct mail can be a high-risk, high-yield proposition. But if you're smart, it can be high-yield, without the risk, as long as you know how to test".
Rebecca Hauptman - Posted on December 16, 2008
After reading this article the book "The Long Tail" immediately came to mind. Sure, those contributions were small on average -- but when you add (or multiply) them up, they become significant.

Thanks for the article.