Target Marketing

You will be automatically redirected to targetmarketingmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

Satellite Radio: Seriously, Folks, Are XM and Sirius Serious? Ignoring Marketing Basics Can Cost Big Time

On Aug. 5, 2005, in a column titled, “Dress Codes—Do They Matter?” I described Philadelphia restaurateur Susanna Goihman whose Lexus struck and killed 15-year-old Kayla Peter on June 19 and left the scene of the accident. Goihman arrived

August 2006 By Denny Hatch
11

In the News

We Tune In to the Panoply Of Nontraditional Options; The ‘111 Wussiest Songs Ever’
Everyone knocks radio, but it must be doing something right. Souping up the old standby has become the business of a growing number of companies. Complaints about the dullness of traditional radio started coming to a crescendo in the late 1990s as the business consolidated and radio conglomerates streamlined operations, creating stations that many people thought sounded the same. Many tuned out; adults spend less time each week listening to radio than they did 10 years ago, according to Arbitron Inc. Among the irritants: an onslaught of ads, too much chatter, repetitive playlists and spotty reception. While frustrated listeners reached for their CD players—and later their iPods—instead, many entrepreneurs spied an opportunity to offer new kinds of radio services using satellite, cellphone, Internet and digital technologies.
Sarah McBride, The Wall Street Journal, Aug. 24, 2006
The dry test is a beautiful thing.

If you have an itch to start a magazine, two ways exist to scratch that itch:

1. Dry test. Spend $100,000 to find a universe of likely subscribers, create a direct mail package that makes your magazine so real that people believe it exists, offer three issues free, and see if anybody responds. You won’t know retention, which only comes after the publication has started and readers either love it or are ho-hummed by it. But a dry test will let you see if your idea fogs the mirror.

2. Spend millions starting a magazine and hope someone buys it.

A dry test is far, far cheaper and more efficient than creating product and trying to sell it as an afterthought.

A dry test starts with the customer and works backward. At some point I’ll write a column on dry testing and the arithmetic of starting a magazine.

What happens if a product—such as satellite radio—cannot be dry tested, or tested at all?

If you don’t start with the customer and work backward, you’ll lose your shirt.

In 2005, Sirius lost $863 million, and XM Satellite Radio lost $667 million.

In my book, this isn’t chump change, but it’s clear that chumps are in charge.

The Financial Media Don’t Understand Squat About Marketing or About How Business Works
When I wrote “PRICELINE.COM: A Layman’s Guide to Manipulating the Media,” it was evident early on that this pure-play, dot-com startup had a deeply flawed business model (since corrected) that failed to satisfy its customers. The business press—The Wall Street Journal, Forbes and Business Week, as well as newspaper financial writers nationwide—behaved like a bunch of giddy, scantily clad cheerleaders. They drove the priceline.com stock up from the IPO of $16 to a high of $165, whereupon it closed out the year 2000 at $1.31—less than 1/100 of its obscene high. Only Fortune saw through the smoke and mirrors and continuously raised red flags.

Now comes satellite radio.

On Aug. 15, The Wall Street Journal ran a lengthy story by Sarah McBride with the following headline:

Until Recently Full of Promise, Satellite Radio Runs into Static.

XM, Sirius Post Big Losses As Listeners Prove Fickle; Investors Take a Pass, Too. One-Year Free Trials End Soon.

Takeaway Points to Consider:

* ”Imitation is the sincerest form of collective stupidity.”
—W. Carroll (Bill) Munro, marketing director, PepsiCo

* ”God protect us from amateurs.”
—Henry Castor, book salesman

* ”Build it and they will come is bullshit. Build it, sell the hell out of it and they will come.”
—Willard Rouse, real estate developer

* With any new business—or existing business—start with the customer and work up from there.

* “The customer or prospect doesn’t give a damn about you, your company or your product. All that matters is, ‘What’s in it for me?’”
—Bob Hacker

* Go to the Sirius or XM Web site, and you’ll find a lot of “it” copy—radios, discounts, accessories, how to order, schedules and personalities, but not one single benefit of subscribing.

* Neither XM nor Sirius makes any attempt to show why it’s a better deal than the other. They force prospects to spend a ton of time doing research and figuring out which is right for them.

*Direct marketing is basically an impulse sale. If the prospect gets bogged down trying to make a decision, chances are a decision will be put off and the sale is lost.

Web Sites Related to Today's Edition:

XM Satellite Radio
http://www.xmradio.com

Sirius Satellite Radio
http://www.sirius.com/
 
11

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Denny Hatch - Posted on September 05, 2006
To:Chuck

Thanx for writing. Fret not. If you click on "Print Article" at upper right, you get the entire piece on one page.

Thanx again. Cheers.

Chuck - Posted on September 05, 2006
Love your stuff... but hate the new format. Have to go to landscape and then print pg.1 pg. 2, etc... bring back the all in one style please!
Denny Hatch - Posted on September 01, 2006
To: Linda Loose

Hi Linda,

Thanx for writing.

You can click on "Print Article" at upper right and get the whole thing on one page.

Cheers, Mate!
Richard Riccelli - Posted on September 01, 2006
Brilliant piece Denny. As one who makes his living (to a great extent) creating DM for publishers daring to risk a dry test, I agree with your analysis and second your ideas. (But you didn't have to make the solution look so effortless!)

You wrote at the top: "At some point I?ll write a column on dry testing and the arithmetic of starting a magazine."
I would love to read that too.

In the meantime, thanks for your pieces. Several have make a positive difference in my business.

Richard Riccelli
Linda Loose - Posted on September 01, 2006
Can't ever fault your content or style - but I do have to weigh in on the new page-by-page format.Hate it. Hope you get enough similar response to go back to the old scroll.
Patricia - Posted on August 31, 2006
Thanks, great insightful article. I've been watching the satellite radio fiasco from afar and agree that their marketing strategies are unbelievably inept. As a music lover and potential customer, I've never been able to figure out if either service would benefit me in the least. About a year ago I purchased an FM streaming device for my iPod, and now listen to my 2,000+ collection when driving through areas where standard radio reception fails...the FM iPod player has paid for itself several times over already, just like my iPod. At this point not being a Stern fan there's no reason for me to consider wasting $12.95 a month on satellite radio.
John Fabian - Posted on August 31, 2006
I have been a Sirius subscriber since I bought a new car 18 months ago. In that time, I have never once received any communication from the company. Is it possible that these companies also have a back-end (i.e., conversion/renewal) problem because they're also not doing basic customer TLC?"

John Fabian
BOB W. - Posted on August 31, 2006
I joined XM Radio about 10 months ago and it has made a huge change in my life/attitude. Not that I was nuts before, but now I can turn on the radio in my vehicle and not be assaulted with middle of the road music, talk radio drivel and only local trivial crap.

i get to hear my beloved New York Yankees, New York Rangers and musical choices from Indi and alternative-type stations not previous available. With all of the time I am in my vehicle on a daily basis, I now have a better chance at staying awake instead of nodding out at traffic lights.......mostly from boredom.

Thank You for XM radio!
Steve D - Posted on August 31, 2006
Ny wife & I have been XM subscribers now for nearly four years. I personally would rather give up any one of lifes simplest pleasures in exchange for XM radio.
The ability to program my day around the vast musical choices, and not to mention the ability to sit back and listen to my beloved Red Sox throughout the season, is worth every bit of the subscription price. With the LOUSY radio choices in Atlanta, satellite radio is a godsend. No commercials, music I want to hear in genres not available in most markets (read Atlanta, South Carolina), that caters to my taste and desires.
I have said from the beginning that there was room for only one service like this and now it's become sort of like Coke vs Pepsi....drink whichever you like is up to you but they are both colas.
I will say that I have never seen such POOR market strategies that have been engaged by XM. With nearly (or more than I am not sure) a two year lead time in introduction to marketplace, they should have sewn up the niche market and never allow Sirrius into the game. I even went so far as to e-mail their marketing director and asked what's up with "radio to the power of x" What kind of brand awareness campaign to launch was that?
I am surprised that I am paying for something that is free over the airways throughout the world, but find the value proposition greater than the common sense of music for free. But hey, who paid for water 15 years ago and look at that marketplace!!!
Long live satellite radio!
R.West - Posted on August 31, 2006
I agree with you that the Howard stern marketing piece could offend the "normal" recipient. However this was sent to "Stern fans who signed up for a Sirius-oriented mailing list". These were already Stern fans and knew what they were signing up for. If anything I think this shows a direct marketing campaign that not only understood their target, but was not afraid to marketing to them in a albeit unconventional way. From what I understand Sirius has experienced almost 100% growth in the number of subscribers since Stern went on the air in January. Like him or not, he seems to be pulling in the subscriptions.
drayton bird - Posted on August 31, 2006
What a gloriously accurate and perceptive description of why most firms have not even the tiniest smidgeon of the glimmering of a clue about marketing - with a brilliant 15-minute masterclass on how to do it right thrown in.
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Denny Hatch - Posted on September 05, 2006
To:Chuck

Thanx for writing. Fret not. If you click on "Print Article" at upper right, you get the entire piece on one page.

Thanx again. Cheers.

Chuck - Posted on September 05, 2006
Love your stuff... but hate the new format. Have to go to landscape and then print pg.1 pg. 2, etc... bring back the all in one style please!
Denny Hatch - Posted on September 01, 2006
To: Linda Loose

Hi Linda,

Thanx for writing.

You can click on "Print Article" at upper right and get the whole thing on one page.

Cheers, Mate!
Richard Riccelli - Posted on September 01, 2006
Brilliant piece Denny. As one who makes his living (to a great extent) creating DM for publishers daring to risk a dry test, I agree with your analysis and second your ideas. (But you didn't have to make the solution look so effortless!)

You wrote at the top: "At some point I?ll write a column on dry testing and the arithmetic of starting a magazine."
I would love to read that too.

In the meantime, thanks for your pieces. Several have make a positive difference in my business.

Richard Riccelli
Linda Loose - Posted on September 01, 2006
Can't ever fault your content or style - but I do have to weigh in on the new page-by-page format.Hate it. Hope you get enough similar response to go back to the old scroll.
Patricia - Posted on August 31, 2006
Thanks, great insightful article. I've been watching the satellite radio fiasco from afar and agree that their marketing strategies are unbelievably inept. As a music lover and potential customer, I've never been able to figure out if either service would benefit me in the least. About a year ago I purchased an FM streaming device for my iPod, and now listen to my 2,000+ collection when driving through areas where standard radio reception fails...the FM iPod player has paid for itself several times over already, just like my iPod. At this point not being a Stern fan there's no reason for me to consider wasting $12.95 a month on satellite radio.
John Fabian - Posted on August 31, 2006
I have been a Sirius subscriber since I bought a new car 18 months ago. In that time, I have never once received any communication from the company. Is it possible that these companies also have a back-end (i.e., conversion/renewal) problem because they're also not doing basic customer TLC?"

John Fabian
BOB W. - Posted on August 31, 2006
I joined XM Radio about 10 months ago and it has made a huge change in my life/attitude. Not that I was nuts before, but now I can turn on the radio in my vehicle and not be assaulted with middle of the road music, talk radio drivel and only local trivial crap.

i get to hear my beloved New York Yankees, New York Rangers and musical choices from Indi and alternative-type stations not previous available. With all of the time I am in my vehicle on a daily basis, I now have a better chance at staying awake instead of nodding out at traffic lights.......mostly from boredom.

Thank You for XM radio!
Steve D - Posted on August 31, 2006
Ny wife & I have been XM subscribers now for nearly four years. I personally would rather give up any one of lifes simplest pleasures in exchange for XM radio.
The ability to program my day around the vast musical choices, and not to mention the ability to sit back and listen to my beloved Red Sox throughout the season, is worth every bit of the subscription price. With the LOUSY radio choices in Atlanta, satellite radio is a godsend. No commercials, music I want to hear in genres not available in most markets (read Atlanta, South Carolina), that caters to my taste and desires.
I have said from the beginning that there was room for only one service like this and now it's become sort of like Coke vs Pepsi....drink whichever you like is up to you but they are both colas.
I will say that I have never seen such POOR market strategies that have been engaged by XM. With nearly (or more than I am not sure) a two year lead time in introduction to marketplace, they should have sewn up the niche market and never allow Sirrius into the game. I even went so far as to e-mail their marketing director and asked what's up with "radio to the power of x" What kind of brand awareness campaign to launch was that?
I am surprised that I am paying for something that is free over the airways throughout the world, but find the value proposition greater than the common sense of music for free. But hey, who paid for water 15 years ago and look at that marketplace!!!
Long live satellite radio!
R.West - Posted on August 31, 2006
I agree with you that the Howard stern marketing piece could offend the "normal" recipient. However this was sent to "Stern fans who signed up for a Sirius-oriented mailing list". These were already Stern fans and knew what they were signing up for. If anything I think this shows a direct marketing campaign that not only understood their target, but was not afraid to marketing to them in a albeit unconventional way. From what I understand Sirius has experienced almost 100% growth in the number of subscribers since Stern went on the air in January. Like him or not, he seems to be pulling in the subscriptions.
drayton bird - Posted on August 31, 2006
What a gloriously accurate and perceptive description of why most firms have not even the tiniest smidgeon of the glimmering of a clue about marketing - with a brilliant 15-minute masterclass on how to do it right thrown in.