5 Instances Where SEM Works Better Than SEO
September 2, 2009 By Heather Fletcher, Senior Editor, Target Marketing
Indebted consumers searching Google for "financial freedom" and a chance to reduce their bills were 101 percent more likely to convert to 800-number callers of San Diego-based debt settlement firm Fidelity Debt Solutions after the company optimized its paid search landing page.
The triple-digit conversion lift came about because various elements of the fidelitydebt.net landing page could be tested and changed in the search engine marketing space much faster than it could in the organic arena. Then those SEM findings could be added to search engine optimization tactics, says Brian Lewis, vice president of San Diego-based search marketing firm Engine Ready, which designed the FDS paid search landing page.
Below, five instances where SEM results lord over SEO abilities are enumerated by Lewis; Rich Kahn, chief executive officer of Middletown, Del.-based search marketing firm eZanga; and Matt Kain, chief revenue officer of Santa Monica, Calif.-based search marketing firm The Search Agency.
1. SEM is faster than SEO. Testing and ranking can happen in real time. Lewis says his firm optimized the FDS landing page items such as the call to action, 800-number location and legibility, contact form, and a 32-second, explanatory video.
"If you put up a campaign with search engine marketing, you can put up a bunch of tests, a bunch of different campaigns, test them all—and you can do that all in the first day," Kahn says. As for the most obvious ranking aspects, he adds, SEM always ends up with the top rankings, no matter how high the SEO results are. And beyond that, paid search has access to more than Google.com. Google teams with other sites, so paid search customers also have access to those sites, Kahn says.
In addition, Kahn relates an example where a client ranked for keywords simply by pursuing an SEM strategy before redesigning its company Web site. The client provided eZanga with 35 terms "that they should've ranked pretty well for," Kahn points out, but only one of them provided a 400-level ranking. None were on the first page of organic results, he says. Six months into the SEM contract with eZanga, without the company having changed a single word on its site, about 26 of those terms were on the first page of organic results. "It just makes sense," Kahn says. "I mean, if you're a paid customer of Google, Google wants to take care of its customers. So whether it's one of their algorithms that they use or it's some other issue that's happening, every time I see a company just add in search engine marketing, their SEO ranks, over time, increase."
The triple-digit conversion lift came about because various elements of the fidelitydebt.net landing page could be tested and changed in the search engine marketing space much faster than it could in the organic arena. Then those SEM findings could be added to search engine optimization tactics, says Brian Lewis, vice president of San Diego-based search marketing firm Engine Ready, which designed the FDS paid search landing page.
Below, five instances where SEM results lord over SEO abilities are enumerated by Lewis; Rich Kahn, chief executive officer of Middletown, Del.-based search marketing firm eZanga; and Matt Kain, chief revenue officer of Santa Monica, Calif.-based search marketing firm The Search Agency.
1. SEM is faster than SEO. Testing and ranking can happen in real time. Lewis says his firm optimized the FDS landing page items such as the call to action, 800-number location and legibility, contact form, and a 32-second, explanatory video.
"If you put up a campaign with search engine marketing, you can put up a bunch of tests, a bunch of different campaigns, test them all—and you can do that all in the first day," Kahn says. As for the most obvious ranking aspects, he adds, SEM always ends up with the top rankings, no matter how high the SEO results are. And beyond that, paid search has access to more than Google.com. Google teams with other sites, so paid search customers also have access to those sites, Kahn says.
In addition, Kahn relates an example where a client ranked for keywords simply by pursuing an SEM strategy before redesigning its company Web site. The client provided eZanga with 35 terms "that they should've ranked pretty well for," Kahn points out, but only one of them provided a 400-level ranking. None were on the first page of organic results, he says. Six months into the SEM contract with eZanga, without the company having changed a single word on its site, about 26 of those terms were on the first page of organic results. "It just makes sense," Kahn says. "I mean, if you're a paid customer of Google, Google wants to take care of its customers. So whether it's one of their algorithms that they use or it's some other issue that's happening, every time I see a company just add in search engine marketing, their SEO ranks, over time, increase."
Companies Mentioned:
 |
|
|
The Secrets of Paid Search
Rebecca is right. SEO and PPC are both part of SEM. Search Engine Marketing includes both SEO and PPC.
Rich Kahn has no idea what he's talking about. If you use PPCs you'll rank better in the natural search results? Can I call bull crap on that one? There is no proof of that, and if there was, Google would be in some serious hot water.
As the editor-in-chief of Target Marketing, let me state for the record that this article is indeed comparing paid search to organic search. It seems we would have created some confusion no matter which terms we chose, so we opted for the language used by the interview subjects themselves.
There's some good info in here, Heather. If I were to add another point (and I'm not bashing SEO - they each have benefits over the other), which I think is really critical to understand, it would be the ability to geo-target just to the areas you want to reach. In the US, this works pretty well, even all the way down to the city level.
I'm a little worried about point #5. The best thing about Google (and I'm really meaning all paid search, but that's what most small business owners think of) is that they've made it really easy for folks to get started with AdWords without huge budgets, amounts of time, or knowledge. The worst part about Google may be the exact same point.
It's very dangerous for folks to just get something up and running, plug in a credit card and forget about it. Without good keyword research, organization, network targeting, and all the other major, let alone minor, facets that go into good campaign management, someone could get put in a hole really fast.
That's not to say I don't know many small businesses that do incredibly well on their own - I definitely do. But they're all putting in the time and effort and not just going on auto-pilot.
It's not like there is a style guide for internet marketing acronyms. I see SEM substituted for PPC and SEO substituted for organic optimization more often then not. What is the difference. These are all new words and the definitions are in flux - so just roll with it. Sheesh... You are going to have to explain it to the decision maker regardless.
I haven't even read the second page and already am ticked off.
If you are a MARKETER -- a REAL marketer, and know your "stuff", you should know that SEM stands for SEARCH ENGINE MARKETING, which includes SEO, PPC, etc. This article should be titled '5 Instances Where PPC Works Better Than SEO".
Don't confuse people. They are confused enough as it is.