Ad networks long have been a core component of any media plan. While in the early days of online advertising ad networks struggled to justify their existence, they now are welcomed in every major advertising budget thanks to their reach and scalability. Traditional ad networks can provide immediate results — and working with an ad network facilitates understanding of the marketing challenges, the ever-changing dynamics and the science behind driving greater value from online advertising.
By now, we’re pretty familiar with the traditional ad networks that have been around since the early ’90s, when (the then-independent) DoubleClick developed the first network of advertising sites and servers. The company developed and refined a targeting methodology that worked so well it became the de facto standard for how ad serving would work going forward. As far as it went, it was a good, easy-to-understand model. Advertisers paid publishers for every click. DoubleClick “owned” the targeting data, but only in the sense that it resided on its servers in order to execute campaigns and keep accounts. Just for clarity, the ubiquitous Wikipedia defines the ad network as follows: “Advertising network refers to an infomediary, which serves between a group (network) of Web sites (which want to host advertisements) and advertisers [that] want to run advertisements on those sites.”
Traditional ad networks
The traditional ad networks can be broadly categorized according to how the individual prospects are selected or targeted, and the range of publishers’ Web sites on which the advertisements can appear. Irrespective of these differences in emphasis, organization and approach, most networks offer a range of options, including demographic, geographic, (increasingly) behavioral and day-parting — which refers to the practice of dividing the day into several parts, during which a different type of radio or TV programming, or, in this case, Web advertising is aired. Many also will allow marketers to mix and match various criteria of selection, creating a near infinite range of possibilities for finding specific categories of prospects and serving them targeted messages.
Let’s take a quick overview of the core characteristics of the more effective traditional networks.
Contextual networks. Simply put, a contextual network will ensure that an ad will show up in a spot most appropriate to the purpose of the ad itself, thus allowing contextual relevance to drive the likelihood of a response. A simple example of this would be an ad for the new Ford Edge on a car-enthusiast site. The technology, analytics and obtainable degrees of granularity involved vary, but they generally involve semantic keyword matching and content indexing. However contextual matching is implemented, the core idea is that contextual ads are more likely to be considered useful and valuable as opposed to interruptive or annoying.
Contextual ads have been referred to as the next best things to search in terms of aligning with customers’ intentions.
Behavioral targeting. An alternative approach to contextual targeting is offered by the behavioral networks. Behavioral targeting refers to messaging targeted to a specific individual based on his previous online behavior. Take, for example, the aforementioned car enthusiast. Since we know that he regularly visits automotive-focused sites, why wouldn’t we serve him an ad related to car insurance or winter tires in September? These ads could be presented anywhere on the network — in the middle of an online newspaper article concerning restaurants in New York, for example. The objective here is not contextual relevance but to target an individual based on a given set of behaviors at a given time.
Studies have shown that conversions are higher when people are targeted through behavior rather than content because behavior can determine a person’s actions. The behavioral networks are able to segment their visitors based on behavior over a given period — this observation of behavior allows the networks (with a high degree of accuracy) to predict a visitor’s sex, age, income level, etc., and to use these variables in determining which ads to show when. Any direct marketer will tell you that recency of action is a great predictor of future actions. Behavioral targeting allows us to react to recency of action in nanoseconds.
Cost-per-action networks. Many direct-response advertisers consider cost-per-action networks the optimal approach since, as the name implies, the advertisers only pay for a predefined action such as registering or purchasing a product or service. There is a perception that cost-per-action advertising is only for the lower, less savory end of the market. However, many household name brands use the approach and make up 30 percent to 45 percent of all CPA advertising. Equally, some of the leading sites also will accept CPA ad buys when inventory is available.
Vertical networks. Finally, the vertical networks are in the traditional space. These specialty networks cater to different sectors or industries such as automotive, consumer electronics, sports, travel, etc. Clearly, a vertical network should not inhibit the reach of a campaign. Broadbranding campaigns should do as well on the horizontal network as on a vertical network. In this case, a vertical network becomes a part of a media plan, alongside the horizontal network. Networks always have served the long tail of an ad campaign; vertical ad networks should be used the same way.
A growing media
The prolific growth in consumer-generated content/media has seen an increasing number of ad networks with varied models that take advantage of the mounting power of social networks. Placing messages in these destinations can reinforce and take advantage of the influence-marketing phenomenon. Technology now can constantly evaluate and refine the networks’ inventories based on which sites become part of influential and relevant conversations. Advertisers can modify their networks any time by swapping sites in and out based on their current influences.
To quote Greg Sterling, founder of Sterling Market Intelligence: “Online conversations, including blogs, are gaining more and more sway over consumer purchase decisions. Technology is important because it allows marketers to see much more clearly the particular blogs and conversations that represent the sources of influence shaping those consumer perceptions.”
The average clickthrough rate of static banners is now less than 3 percent, so it’s no surprise that new formats are rapidly penetrating the market. Clearspring launched its “widget network” in January of this year, and major clients such as Virgin Mobile, Blockbuster Online and The Learning Channel already have signed up. The platform enables interactive widgets or gadgets to be distributed on many supported destination sites, including Facebook, iGoogle, MySpace, Windows Live Spaces and Blogger. Early results on this type of customer interaction mechanism are encouraging — we are seeing five times more engagement with these formats.
There’s no question that the distributed Web — blogs, social networks, etc. — is growing and will continue to grow in significance, and, as such, innovation will continue to fuel growth and opportunity in this space.
Reach Mark Taylor at email@example.com.