How Not to Generate Leads
Never Hire a General Agency to Do Your Direct. NEVER! On March 8, 2007, I explored Wal-Mart’s new strategy of stocking upscale designer merchandise to compete with Target, J.C. Penney and Kohl’s. The title of the story: “Your Customers:
May 2007 By Denny HatchIn the News
Private Cash Offer $500Dear Denison Hatch,
Recently, the level of sophistication and craftsmanship in every type of vehicle has surged upward. The luxury market, perhaps more than any other, leads the charge. So to stay ahead of raised expectations, Lincoln has raised the bar.
The quest to remain a leader begins in the pages of the enclosed portfolio. The new 2007 Lincoln MKX crossover. The new 2007 Lincoln Navigator and Navigator L SUVs. The new Lincoln 2007 MKZ sedan. And the Lincoln Mark LT. Each luxury vehicle adheres to strict principles of precision, technology and comfort. Additionally, each imparts a new energy to the brand that practically invented luxury and is now taking it to the next level.
—Michael Richards, general marketing manager. Letter received on May 18, 2007.
Does customer service experience qualify him to oversee a direct marketing lead-generation campaign for Lincoln cars?
Hardly.
Richards sent me a mailing so humongous—a 10˝ x 15 1⁄2 ˝ four-color outer envelope—that it dominated everything that had come through the mail slot.
Inside the carrier envelope were two elements: a giant 20-page, four-color brochure on heavy paper stock and a 9 1⁄2˝ x 15˝ white card stock piece with a letter on the right side and a $500 certificate on the left.
In this behemoth of a mailing, Michael Richards did not ask me to order a 4x4 Navigator or offer to let me charge $44,985 to my credit card.
That is the only thing he did right.
John Miglautsch and the Question of When
Whatever electronic trail you have left behind over the course of your life will be recorded in some database or other and follow you beyond the grave.
By aggregating all the information on you and your family, database marketers can assemble elegant electronic dossiers —income, demographics, behavior, credit score, product preferences, presence of children, illnesses, criminal records and career moves, to name a few.
As a result, it is possible to predict with profitable accuracy the things you are likely to buy and can afford to pay for.
John Miglautsch of Miglautsch Marketing in Hartland, Wis. is a very savvy database marketer who I have known for a long time.
Many years ago, it was Miglautsch who alerted me to the ultimate one-word imponderable of direct marketing:
When?
For example, Miglautsch described how periodically he would receive mailings from automobile manufacturers—Acura, Toyota, Jeep, GM and others. In his income bracket and ZIP code—combined with the layers of information contained in his electronic dossier found in databases that were rocketing around the country several hundred times a day—he certainly was a candidate for a new vehicle every few years.
But at the time, he had an old Volvo to which he was deeply attached. Although it had mileage in the six figures, Miglautsch spent a ton of money over the years keeping it in pristine condition. It ran beautifully and he had absolutely no intention of getting rid of it.
Then, one day, he totaled it on a bridge; he was in the market for a new car that afternoon.
No database in the world—no matter how sophisticated—could have predicted the “when” of a John Miglautsch automobile purchase.
Why Michael Richards’ Pitch was Wasted—Part I
Like John Miglautsch, my wife, Peggy, and I have an old Scandinavian car—a 1999 Saab 9.5 sedan with less than 60,000 miles—and we have spent big bucks with Saab to keep it running like new.
This will be our last car unless, like Miglautsch, we total it.
Even then, we would never dream of buying a Lincoln for one very basic reason: Lincolns are very large cars ad we live on a street so narrow that snow plows cannot navigate it.
Why Michael Richards’s Pitch Was Wasted—Part II
The giant mailing—which to my 71-year-old eyeballs had to cost somewhere between $2 and $3 (and likely much more)—contained to following:
* It was all about dreams. The words “dream” or “dreams” appeared 19 times in the copy.
* The brochure, made up of eight two-page spreads that stretched 30˝ long by 9 1⁄2˝ high, had a series of seven teeny inch-high, black-and-white photo stories running along the bottom entitled “My Dream.” Here was the story of a Wall Street analyst who became a Sonoma Valley winemaker and a girl who was so in love with her homemade wedding dress that she started a wedding dress design company. You get the idea. These stories had nothing to do with Lincolns and everything to do with the agency’s arty creative process.
* At the end of these dream sequences was the URL, www.mydream.tv —a YouTube-like exercise in warm fuzzies where you could see these heart-warming stories in motion. If the prospect does indeed go to this URL and gets involved with these dream story videos, Lincoln has lost the lead.
*The brochure was filled with beauty shots of exteriors and interiors of several new Lincoln models with descriptions in 7-point sans serif type—much of it reversed-out against dark and busy backgrounds making it utterly unreadable—describing the myriad features of the various models in techie Lincoln engineering jargon.
* The letter—on the left side of 9 1⁄2˝ x 15˝ addressing card—was in 7-point sans serif type and started with a self-laudatory lecture:
Dear Denison Hatch,
Recently, the level of sophistication and craftsmanship in every type of vehicle has surged upwards. The luxury market, perhaps more than any other, leads the charge. So to stay ahead of raised expectations, Lincoln has raised the bar.
* A line on the reply device stopped me cold with its marketing MBA jargon:
2. We would like to provide you with the appropriate incentive information.
How do you plan to obtain your next vehicle? __ Purchase __Lease
The Secrets of Successful Lead Generation
In my opinion, the most knowledgeable person on the planet about generating leads is Seattle guru Bob Hacker, founder of the Hacker Group.
What follows is some of Hacker’s business common sense on how to generate leads from Don Jackson’s and my “2,239 Tested Secrets for Direct Marketing Success.”
* In lead generation, the more you tell, the less you sell.
Copy platforms should focus on generating a lead, not closing the sale. When you say too much, you often create reasons not to respond. The goal at each step of a multi-step sale is to get to the next step. When you try to skip a step, you break the sales chain and scare away qualified buyers. Tease the prospect into wanting to know more. Be strong on emotional benefits—leave the features and advantages to the sales rep.
* Strong offers, boldly stated, are the key to success.
If the offer is a 25 percent discount, tell me now! Don’t bury it in the brochure or sixth paragraph of the letter. Tell me if I can’t survive without it. “Billboard” the offer with Johnson boxes, bold face, underlining, highlighting and inserts. And tell me often in the letter, brochure and response form.
* Test ugly early.
Pretty packages soothe. Ugly disturbs, and disturbed people respond better than peaceful people. And there’s more good news: Ugly usually costs less—which brings down cost per response.
* Assume the reader doesn’t care.
Because they don’t care about you or your product. They want to know what’s in it for them. First, tell them what they get. Then, if that grabs them, they may sit still for your story.
* Use the great motivators.
Greed, anger, fear, guilt and exclusivity. Fear of loss and want of gain have sold more product than all other offers combined. Use the ephemeral if you want to win awards; use the visceral if you want to sell product.
* Use words that sell.
Pepper your copy with words like: understand - proven - health - easy - free- guarantee - money - safety - save - love - new- discover - right - results - truth - comfort - proud - profit -deserve - happy - trust - value - fun - vital
*Avoid response killers—words to avoid: cost - pay - contract - sign - try - worry - loss - lose - hurt - death - buy - bad - sell - sold - price - decision - hard - difficult - obligation - liable - fail
A Note on the Illustrations
Below are illustrations from the Lincoln mailer. My scanner is too small to take in the massive size of the pieces from this murky, moody, muddy mailing effort. The letter and $500 certificate are two halves of the same cardboard sheet. The envelope design that depicts an interstate highway with a clover-leaf exit is repeated on the back of the envelope. The brochure cover is half the full cover, and when opened to the full 30˝ front and back, it shows a diorama of a city skyline taken from an interstate with no vehicles on it. The page with the car seats and reversed-out sans serif mouse-type is one-fourth the full two-page spread.
Takeaway Points to Consider:
* Lead-generation marketing is a unique animal, unlike other direct.* Clearly, Lincoln’s Michael Richards and the agency that executed this effort were in way over their heads.
* Bob Hacker has said that if you spend too much on the first mailing in a lead-gen series, you will lose money.
* In lead-gen efforts, it is essential to focus on the offer, not the product. If you tell the complete product story in the initial piece, you have nothing new to say in follow-up communications.
* The only object of lead generation is to get the prospect to say yes to the next step.
* Never hire a general agency to do your direct marketing.
* Never let a customer service manager oversee your direct marketing.
* In marketing, the three most important words are “Arithmetic,” “Arithmetic” and “Arithmetic.”
* “Every time we get creative, we lose money.”
—Ed McCabe, former CEO of RCA Record Club
Web Sites Related to Today's Edition:
Lincoln.com—The Official Home of Lincoln Vehicleshttp://www.lincoln.com/
Lincoln Dream Story Videos
www.mydream.tv


I am a newbie. Where can I buy the book you mentioned?:
Don Jackson?s and my ?2,239 Tested Secrets for Direct Marketing Success.?
DENNY HATCH RESPONDS TO NEERAJ. Lead generation has one object: to get the prospect to the next step in the sequence. Attrition will occur all along the way, so with the second effort, you will get a percent of a percent response. And so on with each additional effort as you get less and less responses. For this reason, you cannot spend big bucks for the initial piece, or you will lose your shirt. The way to do lead generation is to spend small bucks to get a lead. Once the prospects have raised their hands, then you can spend more to convert them. This Lincoln promotion got everything bass-ackward--huge money up front. Direct marketing is all about arithmetic, ROI and accountability--a concept that is anathema to general agencies that work to win hearts and minds but haven't a clue how to change behavior.
I understand and appreciate your point of view that a direct mail piece should be more direct than your example. However, weren't these guys playing on the "exclusive" motivator that you mention? If they had a more "direct" mail-in piece do you think this ad would become "good"?
I kind of liked their approach and think it may be on the right track but I would have a different response generator. I would appreciate knowing your opinion on this.
Excellent marketing piece. I love it when someone knows how to tell a story and get the 'audience' involved and become a part of the marketing piece. Kudos to you Denny.
Dr. Carney
Thanks, Denny. I keep telling my graphic artist that "less is more." She loves full bleeds and full color. Those are fine for certain projects, but they often end up looking ordinary. Stark sells. I also have problems with people working with a preferred printer based on relationship instead of bidding jobs to meet the printer's equipment. It's good to know that I'm not the only one who believes that costs are relevant.
Your point about the 7-point sans serif, some of it knocked out of busy backgrounds...a major flaw if one wants the words read, and especially for pieces going to older audiences of squinty eyesight. Typical designers' prejudice against copy ("gray space") and "horsey copy." But inexcusable for a mailing to folks over 50--the primary audience for Lincolns.
One wonders what ex-Boeing whiz (now Ford CEO) Allen Mallaly will have to say about the results (sure to affect his turnaround plans.
Idiocy like this----- and I receive such things all the time--- would never be created if people read Hopkins, Caples, Sackheim, Ogilvy, Collier, et.al.
Thanks, Denny! Reading your piece made me take an even harder look at a letter I just finished for a client. After all these years, I'd still broken a rule or two!
The big question with car buying is the "when." Even a lead generation piece that hits all the right notes can't guarantee that it will arrive "when" you need that next new car. But regularly marketing service through a personalized direct mail program that tracks the way you drive and service your car can ensure that individuals will have your brand - and even your dealership - top of mind when "when" happens. What happened when we pitched such a plan while I was at Devon Direct? The Marketing VP of the nameless auto company said, "I don't want this. I only use direct mail when I want to sell cars!"
Allowed to charge $44,985 on my credit card? -- Big deal, since bank deregulation I think I am paying that much per month in interest... :). Seriously, when I was in high school I learned early that girls did not date guys they thought were cool; they dated guys THEIR FRIENDS thought were cool.
When I got into marketing I was amazed to find that many corporate executives follow this same pattern. They are far less concerned about effectiveness; than what their social peers will be saying at the club.
Insulated from performance like generals insulated from the realities of battle; these "managers" make decisions based on subjective preferences; rather than fiscal realities. As far as that specific mailing; it appears that Ford has yet to shake off its commitment to the Edsel.
Carl Street
Carl_street@cjstreet.com
Great article. I especially enjoyed the "never hire an agency" part. Should be "ad agency" however. There are still a few gems out there that actually know lead generation and what works (and what doesn't). Also: The word "creative" as in ?Every time we get creative, we lose money" is as misused as the word "love." True creative here would be something that would do the job for Lincoln, not just the ad agency's portfolio.
T Taylor, The Creative Alliance
Excellent real-world application of how affect (feeling) does NOT match behavior (clicking, dialing, buying). There are far less expensive media to paint pretty images - but Richards used the costliest means to get buyers.
Your observations are as usual right on target, Denny. The process behind the mailing you describe seems to represent an all-too-typical scenario where credulous clients believe they?re playing it safe by going along with their enormously self-congratulatory and arrogant general ad agencies ? who regard the techniques and accountability of real direct marketing with disdain while claiming glorious achievements in the area that ?really counts??. brand building. A frequent coda to such situations, after the general agency-engineered monstrosity has generated paltry results at great expense: A client who says ?Direct mail? We tried it. Doesn?t work for us.?
only once question i've struggled with: ugly sells, but it also diminishes percieved value. a glossy beautiful piece reminds people how wonderful you are, but does nothing to move them.
Excellent material. Denny is a wealth of info.
Thanks for this excellent piece. It seems this Michael Richards is no better at lead generation than his namesake is at standup comedy. Perhaps they should switch! The pity is, there are at least a hundred unseen, unknown DM agencies around the country who could have done 10 times the job at one-tenth the cost.
... And, Michael Lewis, don't forget Herschell Gordon Lewis's dictum: Stop talking about yourself.
Denny, I agree with most of what you say. Selling dreams can work but you really need to know your market to do it effectively. The biggest problem I see with the abomintion you describe stems from the high value of "looking good" in a corporation / culture that *sells* looking good as a big part of the product / experience. (You don't buy a Lincoln Navigator for too many other reasons.) But the execution and thinking for this campaign was far too navel-gazing-oriented and not focused enough on the customer. I remember one of my first big hits was for a biz-to-biz travel agency that got great referral business but couldn't generate leads to save their lives. Their 3-pound brochure was so beautiful it could have hung in the NY Metropolitan Museum of Art. Looked good but got zero response. I suggested and wrote a Gary Halbert-style "A Pile" letter - laser printed on a plain envelope with a post-office supplied postage stamp. The audience was CEOs of successful entrepreneurial companies - people, in fact, who had Lexuses and Jaguars (DMV lists were still available in those days). The offer was a dream of sorts - the long overdue luxury winter vacation this business owner/builder craved, white glove service, champagne experience at beer-bottle prices. After a few days, they had to stop mailing the letter (they were mailing 25 at a time) and the owner told me this campaign led to $5 million a year in repeat business. If they had kept mailing the glossy brochure over the years, many more trees would have been unhappy and when they sold the company eight years later, its valuation would have been considerably lower.
Excellent piece, Denny.