Marketing Sustainably: What's Going on Beyond and Beneath the Green? A blog posting questions, opportunities, concerns and observations on sustainability in marketing.
Chet Dalzell has 25 years of public relations management and expertise in service to leading brands in consumer, donor, patient and business-to-business markets, and in the field of direct marketing. He serves on the Direct Marketing Association Committee on the Environment and Social Responsibility, where he is currently chairman of the Committee's Marketing & Communications Public Outreach Strategy Working Group (2005-present).
Chet co-developed the first professional certificate program in environmentally responsible marketing within the United States. He also served on the United States Postal Service Greening the Mail Task Force (2007-2010), and led its Life Cycle of Mail Subcommittee.
Email Chet below, or reach him at Twitter or LinkedIn.
YouTube is currently the second largest search engine on the Internet. With 1 billion unique monthly visitors watching YouTube videos,...
Most people know Web 2.0 is simply the evolution of the Internet into an environment of interactivity, reader participation and...
I often get super excited when I see other businesses doing cool and innovative things in mobile. You read an...
If it costs five times more to acquire a new customer than to keep one, why do brands continue to...
This year's hot trend in fashion is computers. Whether at SXSW or in the tech and media hubs on the...
Somewhere, in the world just on the other side of the rainbow, there is a magical day for sending emails....
Is generating leads with LinkedIn proving frustrating and difficult? Probably because you're failing at tempting prospects to click more deeply...
E-commerce opportunity is evolving fast, but only 25 percent of B-to-B marketers are taking advantage of it, according to a...
I live in a relatively small, rural town of 50,000 residents spread over 61 square miles. My specific neighborhood still...
Instagram announced the company will soon begin using your content to sell targeted advertising products to the highest bidder. Does...
It finally happened. Politicians' idiotic email practices had a measurable negative effect. "Maine Republican Party chairman Charlie Webster has admitted...
Trouble is, the Internet is rife with misinformation and if you get caught advertently or inadvertently propagating this nonsense in...
Wondering about a SEO content strategy that offers the biggest impact in the shortest time? Try tweaking your page titles....
|
Marketers who have been counting the days, months, even years, for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to finalize its latest version of the "Green Guides" (formally, Guides for the Use of Environmental Marketing Claims) for making environmental marketing claims must wait no more. (The Guides were established in 1992, and they most recently were updated in 1998.)
The revised guides are 36 pages slim: http://www.ftc.gov/os/2012/10/greenguides.pdf
Perhaps it was the 5,000 public comments—340 of them unique—that the FTC received. Perhaps it was the upcoming Election and the pressure building to put the claims guidance in the public domain, particularly since the public comment period closed nearly two years ago. Needless to say, the Guides are useful in that they provide both timely counsel and marketplace examples on many terms and claims, such as "recycled content," "recyclable" and "degradable."
The newest version of the Guides breaks new ground in six areas: 1) certifications and seals of approval, 2) carbon offsets, 3) "free-of" claims, 4) "non-toxic" claims, 5) "made with renewable energy" claims, and 6) "made with renewable materials" claims. The Guides also clarify previous guidance on terms such as "compostable," "ozone," "recyclable," "recycled content," and source reduction claims, as well as general environmental friendliness claims.
Two noteworthy items are:
"Unqualified general environmental benefit claims are difficult to interpret and likely convey a wide range of meanings. In many cases, such claims likely convey that the product, package, or service has specific and far-reaching environmental benefits and may convey that the item or service has no negative environmental impact. Because it is highly unlikely that marketers can substantiate all reasonable interpretations of these claims, marketers should not make unqualified general environmental benefit claims."
In the same light, I'm not making the claim that paper is preferable to digital. Let's be honest: most marketers are multichannel today. Most direct mail is data-driven, and is also dependent on data centers. And a life cycle analysis of a direct mail piece and a comparable digital message has not yet been achieved, head to head, as far as I know. Not that that matters. What does matter is that marketers who make any environmental claims need to have substantiation of such claims available to consumers to inspect.
Marketers who want to read up on the new Green Guides in brief may do so here, in this handy summary the FTC has created: http://www.ftc.gov/os/2012/10/greenguidessummary.pdf
Previous commentary on "Go Green, Go Digital" from the Marketing Sustainability blog is offered here: http://www.targetmarketingmag.com/blog/making-green-claim-not-waiting-ftc-green-guides
Additionally, here's reporting on of the revised Guides as they apply to the use of carbon offset claims: http://www.environmentalleader.com/2012/10/02/ftcs-revised-green-guides-target-carbon-offset-claims/
I welcome hearing about your observations from the newly revised Guides.
 |
|
