Target Marketing

You will be automatically redirected to targetmarketingmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

The Incompetence of General Ad Agencies

What Happened to the Final “A” in AIDA?

October 2007 By Denny Hatch
13

In the News

Counting More Than Clicks
As online advertising matures, so does the job of measuring results

Advertisers increasingly want more-detailed feedback on the effectiveness of their online marketing efforts, both to justify their increased spending on the Web and to help guide their future allocations across all available media. They want to know not only what ads consumers click on but also how those clicks translate into purchases. They are more focused on understanding how their mix of online marketing works together and how it fits into their broader marketing campaigns. They want to find out how online advertising is affecting the image of their brands, and how to target ads to specific audiences.
Emily Steel, The Wall Street Journal, October 22, 2007
This was a banner week for marketers and their ad agencies crying HELP! The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal ran long stories about the inability of Web advertisers to determine whether their ads were effective or not.

I have spent 45 years in the world of direct marketing, a discipline that is able to measure results down to a gnat’s eyebrow—whether it be mail, space. TV, radio, telephone or the Web. Our feedback comes directly from those to whom we advertise.

Yet the world of general agencies has somehow conned the dumb little yuppie MBA corporate brand managers into believing that it’s okay to spend millions and then rely on the analytics and electronics of third parties to guess whether the money is being well spent.

The situation is sick, sick, sick.

Meet Joan Manley
When Jerry Hardy founded Time-Life Books—turning the massive magazine archives into a magnificent publishing enterprise—his secretary, Joan Manley, was as brilliant as he was. When Hardy moved on, Manley took over as CEO.

Periodically Joan Manley would fly out to her Chicago distribution center and physically go through raw orders—hand-opening Business Reply Envelopes and seeing what they contained.

Manley knew she was not in retail with the luxury of face-to-face interaction with real customers. Hers was the business of manipulating people over long distances using paper.

Apart from random incoming and outgoing phone calls and letters of complaint, examining raw orders is the only way a direct marketer can be directly in touch with the customer.

The same principle holds today. The difference: electronics has replaced paper.

A Personal Aside
A number of years ago I attended Fundraising Day in New York where a guy from Father Flannigan’s Boys and Girls Town was a panelist. One of the mainstays of charity mail is the use of personalized address labels as the freemium (a free goodie in the outgoing envelope). When a consumer receives a sheet of personalized labels to use on the family’s outgoing mail, it lays on a guilt trip that results in a precisely measurable increase in contributions.

Boy’s Town Guy told us that his marketing people flatly refused to test these labels “because everybody was using them and they did not want to look like everybody else.”

One day, Boy’s Town Guy went into the mailroom and grabbed a bag of Business Reply Envelopes à La Joan Manley. To his astonishment, in the upper left corner of many of these BREs were personalized address labels sent out by competing charities. Clearly his donors had responded to this marketing technique by others.

Takeaway Points to Consider:

* “Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted. The trouble is I don’t know which half.”
—John Wanamaker

* Web advertisers today don’t even know that.

* The answer: fire your incompetent general agency and hire on a direct marketer, who will put a system in place solidly based on measurable ROI rather than smoke and mirrors.

* When your Web ad features a hyper-link, make sure it does not go to a home page, but rather directly to a satellite page devoted to that specific offer or campaign.

* No offer, no response.

* “It’s the offer, stupid. If performance isn’t what it should be, check the offer first.”
—Bob Hacker

* “If you want to dramatically increase your response, dramatically improve your offer.”
—Axel Andersson

* Never forget AIDA:
-Attention
-Interest
-Decision
-Action

* Especially pay attention to the final “A”—Action. Otherwise your message will lay there like a lox.

* If you are not directly in touch with your market—and are making decisions based on gut instinct—you are throwing money down the sewer.

Web Sites Related to Today's Edition:

Vin Gupta’s salesgenie.com Super Bowl Ad, c/netNews.com
http://tinyurl.com/2kfrw9

Vin Gupta’s salesgenie.com Super Bowl Ad
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewt4gTtNOvE

2007 Super Bowl Ads Rated by USA Today
http://tinyurl.com/3cngpy

View All 2007 Super Bowl Ads
http://usatodayadmeter.feedroom.com/

“Counting More Than Clicks,” by Emily Steel, The Wall Street Journal
http://tinyurl.com/2jaz6z

“How Many Site Hits? Depends on Who’s Counting,” by Louise Story, The New York Times
http://tinyurl.com/3b2t3p
 
13

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Clyde G - Posted on October 26, 2007
Hey Denny,

Just another great read and lesson. I work with much smaller companies who feel compelled to try and mirror the stupid, unmeasurable marketing practices that you write of. With limited budgets, it is extremely difficult convincing these business owners until I ask them just one question:

What the ROI was on the last image ad they ran before I got there?

I'm sending this to all my clients. Thanks again.

Clyde R. Goulet
Author of "The Survival Guide To Foreclosure"
David Culbertson - Posted on October 26, 2007
Denny,

I am not sure how much I agree. My bread and butter is search engine marketing (pay per click) which, according to numerous studies, has the lowers cost of sale/lead of any format - including direct mail.

That being said, I strongly believe that brand advertising can support direct marketing efforts. There have been numerous studies proving that the more channels in which consumer sees a message about a product, the greater the likelihood of them buying that product.

Thus, whenever possible, I support PPC campaigns with general advertising - web banner banners, tv, radio, print. And I almost always see better overall results.
Judy Shapiro - Posted on October 25, 2007
I?ve looked at life from both sides now ? the agency and client side. And here?s a simple truth -- agencies don?t get until clients get it. Agencies have never led clients in marketing innovation. Why? Simply because there?s little money in it. Innovation takes people resource investment and risk ? both of which agencies are reticent to do.

So client must push their agencies and only then will agencies deal with it. Look at PR. It is stuck in an old model of doing PR to get coverage in the New York Times. Nice? Sure. But does that drive sales? Hardly.

Today for example, the PR model is evolving right under the noses of the agencies into something called PVR = Public + Viral relations (ok ? I use that term since I don?t know what else to call it). PR should be used to gain SEO visibility which gets sales. Don?t look to your PR agency to explain this to you ? they don?t even know how to do a viral relations campaign.

Take it from me (and lots of $$$ I spent in agency fees) ? agencies don?t innovate ? they follow. Maybe that?s why clients are frustrated.
Rainer - Posted on October 25, 2007
Denny, you and Dan Kennedy are made from the same cloth. (That's a compliment.)
Dustin - Posted on October 25, 2007
I'm a Creative Director. I find this article to be a bit of a polemic, but there is a lot of truth.

I would pose a few thoughts on this article:

1. You can use creativity to generate response. Creatives aren't the enemy. Branding enthusiasts who never ask "How will this sell more cars/appliances/shoes?" are the issue.

2. There are new rules. Sure, traditional marketing wisdom should not be ignored online, but the ideas of permission marketing, developing online community, and the interactive capability of the internet can't be ignored either.

Just want you to know there are some creatives who still have a head on their shoulders. We're not all drinking the Madison Avenue Kool-Aid.
Robert Doscher - Posted on October 25, 2007
Denny:

It's amazing how general ad agencies don't get it. There was a coference about the blurring of brand and direct at Ad Week at which the speakers were trying to substatiate the connection between brand and direct.

I won't go into the detail except to say that that agency speakers missed the issue.

Most general ad agenices are in a fog when it comes to direct marketing and don't understand that every promotion leaves a statistical and financial footprint.

At this conference there was one terrific speaker from The Weather Channel and she spoke on mobile advertising. Everyone should contact her though I doubt she would appreciate having me provide her name. She was outstanding and knew how to measure mobile/wireless advertising.

Peter Hochstein - Posted on October 25, 2007
Dear Denny,

Alas, the clash between "creativity" and results even infests some direct response advertising agencies.

True story, with the names of people and the agency redacted to protect the guilty:

In the early 90s I was working at a DR agency. I dreamed up a snap-pak that sold insurance for lost airline baggage. The OE teaser: WARNING: New FAA regulations may impact your travel plans." This referred to new FAA limits on carryon luggage.

The creative director said she hated the package because it was too hard sell and brassy. She added that "We don't do snap packs in this group," but, "I'll present it anyway because they'll never buy it."

Guess what? They bought it. Guess what else? It beat the control. Guess still what else? The creative director hated me for making her a winner, especially when several efforts by her group over a period of about two years failed to beat this package.

For my efforts I became her pariah copywriter. I finally left her group. (And she, I hear, eventually went into account work.)

But wait, this isn't about stupidity for the sake of stupidity. What brings agencies and their creative people fame is their "creativity." So even DR agency creative departments find themselves caught in a schizophrenic nightmare.

It's gotta "look" creative and "sound" creative or the creative people are in trouble and the agency doesn't get new business. On the other hand, if the creative doesn't get responses and ROI, the agency gets canned and the creative people have to look for new jobs.

Little wonder some agencies these days will excuse poor response rates or ROI by huffing, "Well, our main job is to protect your brand image."
matt waters - Posted on October 25, 2007
Hallelujah! Amen! Finally truth with a capital "T". Read, weep, and hit me (www.thewatersagency.com) if you want to do it the old fashioned way. God bless you ? keep up the GREAT service to our country.
Robert - Posted on October 25, 2007
This is a great editorial, with just simple, practical, common sense. There's so much "wow" factor out there with out any incentive. Common sense will always win the day in the end.
Paul Matheson - Posted on October 25, 2007
The dot-com people got it half right - the Internet is a new medium but the paradigm is very similar. The 'old' rules just needed a few minor adjustments in order to apply to the new tools. My wife owns a pet product business and I handle the marketing, advertising, publishing, internet site management, ad nauseum on weekends and after I get home from work. In spite of our budgetary and time restrictions, I am able to track exactly which keywords work, how many people clicked on the ad, who purchased from her store, how much they spent and how often they return. We are also able to use this data to send targeted email or postal mail offers. I am certain that a professional like yourself could utilize these tools to make our system more effective. If a small company run by poorly funded, well-informed amateurs can accurately track our online ad spend then the professionals have no excuses.
George Hague - Posted on October 25, 2007
Denny,

I always enjoy your column, but sometimes you really nail it. Well done.

Thanks,
George
Joe Barcia - Posted on October 25, 2007
Denny, your skill as an editorial writer is outdone only by your courage to tell it like it is. You gave it to those general agency knuckleheads pretty good! Still, when they come limping back from behind the woodshed holding their sore butts, will they have learned their lesson? I'm afraid these smartalecs are too smug to learn anything from their lowly DM brethern. But they better watch their backs. Some advertisers have already yanked open the curtain and disovered the wizard is a fake. And when the marketing exec mob decides to take revenge, it won't be just a trip to the woodshed, but to the guillotine!!
Bilou - Posted on October 25, 2007
So...SalesGenie people will stay home during the Clio Awards, but will have been promoted, expanded their staff and opened new offices due to so many new sales? Not a bad trade off!

Yes, direct hyperlinks ARE important instead of the main web page, and I might add that SALES/MARKETING must be in control of them, instead of the IT Department. Otherwise, you get stuck with something completely unmeaningful/unmemorable, such as www.company.com/offer3820.html and no traffic will go there!
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Clyde G - Posted on October 26, 2007
Hey Denny,

Just another great read and lesson. I work with much smaller companies who feel compelled to try and mirror the stupid, unmeasurable marketing practices that you write of. With limited budgets, it is extremely difficult convincing these business owners until I ask them just one question:

What the ROI was on the last image ad they ran before I got there?

I'm sending this to all my clients. Thanks again.

Clyde R. Goulet
Author of "The Survival Guide To Foreclosure"
David Culbertson - Posted on October 26, 2007
Denny,

I am not sure how much I agree. My bread and butter is search engine marketing (pay per click) which, according to numerous studies, has the lowers cost of sale/lead of any format - including direct mail.

That being said, I strongly believe that brand advertising can support direct marketing efforts. There have been numerous studies proving that the more channels in which consumer sees a message about a product, the greater the likelihood of them buying that product.

Thus, whenever possible, I support PPC campaigns with general advertising - web banner banners, tv, radio, print. And I almost always see better overall results.
Judy Shapiro - Posted on October 25, 2007
I?ve looked at life from both sides now ? the agency and client side. And here?s a simple truth -- agencies don?t get until clients get it. Agencies have never led clients in marketing innovation. Why? Simply because there?s little money in it. Innovation takes people resource investment and risk ? both of which agencies are reticent to do.

So client must push their agencies and only then will agencies deal with it. Look at PR. It is stuck in an old model of doing PR to get coverage in the New York Times. Nice? Sure. But does that drive sales? Hardly.

Today for example, the PR model is evolving right under the noses of the agencies into something called PVR = Public + Viral relations (ok ? I use that term since I don?t know what else to call it). PR should be used to gain SEO visibility which gets sales. Don?t look to your PR agency to explain this to you ? they don?t even know how to do a viral relations campaign.

Take it from me (and lots of $$$ I spent in agency fees) ? agencies don?t innovate ? they follow. Maybe that?s why clients are frustrated.
Rainer - Posted on October 25, 2007
Denny, you and Dan Kennedy are made from the same cloth. (That's a compliment.)
Dustin - Posted on October 25, 2007
I'm a Creative Director. I find this article to be a bit of a polemic, but there is a lot of truth.

I would pose a few thoughts on this article:

1. You can use creativity to generate response. Creatives aren't the enemy. Branding enthusiasts who never ask "How will this sell more cars/appliances/shoes?" are the issue.

2. There are new rules. Sure, traditional marketing wisdom should not be ignored online, but the ideas of permission marketing, developing online community, and the interactive capability of the internet can't be ignored either.

Just want you to know there are some creatives who still have a head on their shoulders. We're not all drinking the Madison Avenue Kool-Aid.
Robert Doscher - Posted on October 25, 2007
Denny:

It's amazing how general ad agencies don't get it. There was a coference about the blurring of brand and direct at Ad Week at which the speakers were trying to substatiate the connection between brand and direct.

I won't go into the detail except to say that that agency speakers missed the issue.

Most general ad agenices are in a fog when it comes to direct marketing and don't understand that every promotion leaves a statistical and financial footprint.

At this conference there was one terrific speaker from The Weather Channel and she spoke on mobile advertising. Everyone should contact her though I doubt she would appreciate having me provide her name. She was outstanding and knew how to measure mobile/wireless advertising.

Peter Hochstein - Posted on October 25, 2007
Dear Denny,

Alas, the clash between "creativity" and results even infests some direct response advertising agencies.

True story, with the names of people and the agency redacted to protect the guilty:

In the early 90s I was working at a DR agency. I dreamed up a snap-pak that sold insurance for lost airline baggage. The OE teaser: WARNING: New FAA regulations may impact your travel plans." This referred to new FAA limits on carryon luggage.

The creative director said she hated the package because it was too hard sell and brassy. She added that "We don't do snap packs in this group," but, "I'll present it anyway because they'll never buy it."

Guess what? They bought it. Guess what else? It beat the control. Guess still what else? The creative director hated me for making her a winner, especially when several efforts by her group over a period of about two years failed to beat this package.

For my efforts I became her pariah copywriter. I finally left her group. (And she, I hear, eventually went into account work.)

But wait, this isn't about stupidity for the sake of stupidity. What brings agencies and their creative people fame is their "creativity." So even DR agency creative departments find themselves caught in a schizophrenic nightmare.

It's gotta "look" creative and "sound" creative or the creative people are in trouble and the agency doesn't get new business. On the other hand, if the creative doesn't get responses and ROI, the agency gets canned and the creative people have to look for new jobs.

Little wonder some agencies these days will excuse poor response rates or ROI by huffing, "Well, our main job is to protect your brand image."
matt waters - Posted on October 25, 2007
Hallelujah! Amen! Finally truth with a capital "T". Read, weep, and hit me (www.thewatersagency.com) if you want to do it the old fashioned way. God bless you ? keep up the GREAT service to our country.
Robert - Posted on October 25, 2007
This is a great editorial, with just simple, practical, common sense. There's so much "wow" factor out there with out any incentive. Common sense will always win the day in the end.
Paul Matheson - Posted on October 25, 2007
The dot-com people got it half right - the Internet is a new medium but the paradigm is very similar. The 'old' rules just needed a few minor adjustments in order to apply to the new tools. My wife owns a pet product business and I handle the marketing, advertising, publishing, internet site management, ad nauseum on weekends and after I get home from work. In spite of our budgetary and time restrictions, I am able to track exactly which keywords work, how many people clicked on the ad, who purchased from her store, how much they spent and how often they return. We are also able to use this data to send targeted email or postal mail offers. I am certain that a professional like yourself could utilize these tools to make our system more effective. If a small company run by poorly funded, well-informed amateurs can accurately track our online ad spend then the professionals have no excuses.
George Hague - Posted on October 25, 2007
Denny,

I always enjoy your column, but sometimes you really nail it. Well done.

Thanks,
George
Joe Barcia - Posted on October 25, 2007
Denny, your skill as an editorial writer is outdone only by your courage to tell it like it is. You gave it to those general agency knuckleheads pretty good! Still, when they come limping back from behind the woodshed holding their sore butts, will they have learned their lesson? I'm afraid these smartalecs are too smug to learn anything from their lowly DM brethern. But they better watch their backs. Some advertisers have already yanked open the curtain and disovered the wizard is a fake. And when the marketing exec mob decides to take revenge, it won't be just a trip to the woodshed, but to the guillotine!!
Bilou - Posted on October 25, 2007
So...SalesGenie people will stay home during the Clio Awards, but will have been promoted, expanded their staff and opened new offices due to so many new sales? Not a bad trade off!

Yes, direct hyperlinks ARE important instead of the main web page, and I might add that SALES/MARKETING must be in control of them, instead of the IT Department. Otherwise, you get stuck with something completely unmeaningful/unmemorable, such as www.company.com/offer3820.html and no traffic will go there!