Target Marketing

You will be automatically redirected to targetmarketingmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

Three Reasons Why Less is More on the Outer

January 2008 By Ethan Boldt
4
The outer envelope. Unexplored territory? A blank canvas? Not so fast. These days, “less copy on the outer often yields a better response,” states Todd Lerner, copywriter/designer and owner of Todd Lerner Advertising in Farmington Hills, Mich.

1. Less Makes It More … Personal
“If you’re trying to make it look more personal, you probably don’t put charts and graphs on the back [of the outer] because then it’s an immediate tip-off that you’re selling something,” says Pat Friesen, copywriter and owner of Pat Friesen & Company in Kansas City, Kan.

Because she’s presently working with an older, educated audience that “doesn’t like hype,” Friesen asserts that the mailing must sound genuine for prospects to open the envelope. She refers to studies that demonstrate that this audience does read its mail, because “they have the time and come from a generation that views the mail as where they get their information from.” Consequently, she focuses all the copy on the inside of the mail piece.

2. Less Makes It More … About the Name
If you’re using a celebrity’s or politician’s name on a mail piece, don’t ruin the effect with teasers and graphics. “You’re seeing a ton of [well-known names] in the corner card with the election coming up because that’s how you get your piece opened,” relates Friesen, who says the goal is to entice them inside the package with this name alone.

3. Less Makes It More … Official and Upscale
Lerner predicts that outers in the future will become increasingly minimal. “It stands out from the pack of frantic-shrieking, hyper-colored pitches filling up today’s mailbox,” he explains. Plus, he says it can look like an official communication from a company with whom the prospect already has a relationship. “If designed well, it can look very good—clean and upscale,” concludes Lerner.
 
4

SPONSORED CONTENT

MORE ON DIRECT MAIL & POSTAL >>

FROM THE BOOKSTORE

Available as a PDF<BR><BR>A guide to the science of direct response testing today, including best practices, power tests, small vs. large test, analyzing results, testing mistakes, new tricks and more.<BR> <BR>Direct marketing — regardless of the channel — is that unique combination of art and science. Direct marketing strategists are constantly striving for better response rates, open rates, conversions, cost-per-order, and life-time value. <BR><BR>And what is the tool that these strategists turn to again and again? That’s right! It’s testing. <BR><BR>In direct marketing, there are plenty of elements to test — from subject lines, premiums, envelope sizes, list selects, pricing, the placement of the shopping cart on the web page ... the choices seem endless. <BR><I><BR>Secrets of Direct Marketing Testing </I>is your personal BRAIN TRUST of testing strategies that you can start to put to use today. <BR><BR>In this guide, you’ll find everything you need to learn — the why, what, when and how-to of testing. From testing structure to basic principles, and from test ideas to mistakes to avoid, you’ll get a crash course in coding, tracking, reading and applying test results. <BR><BR>You’ll learn about: <BR>• Simple copy tests that drive response <BR>• Fine-tuning your offer <BR>• Web and Email testing <BR>• Offer tests <BR>• How to make sure you’re getting reliable results <BR>• Retesting and rolling out your findings <BR>• Plus the Rules that you should test now — or ignore at your own peril! <BR><BR>Are you are searching for ways to raise response, save on your promotion costs, drive down your cost-per-order and extend the lifetime value of your customers? The DirectMarketingIQ and Target Marketing editorial teams have been researching, writing and collecting expert advice from industry leaders about the how-tos of testing for years. <BR><BR>We’ve compiled this information and made it easy for you to find all in one place with our easy-to-read report – <EM>Secrets of Direct Marketing Testing</EM>. Secrets of Direct Marketing Testing

Available as a PDF

A guide to the science of direct response testing today, including best practices, power tests, small vs. large test, analyzing results, testing mistakes, new tricks and more.

Direct marketing — regardless of the channel — is that unique combination of art and science. Direct marketing strategists are constantly striving



...

ORDER NOW

Available as a PDF<BR><BR>Your everything-you-need-to-know guide to personalized URLs, including: <B>Best Practices </B>on why they work, campaign strategy, multichannel creative, analytics, and <B>10 Case Studies.<BR></B><BR>A New Best Practices and Case Studies report from DirectMarketingIQ.<BR> <BR>Do you want a higher response rate? Do you want to make a bigger profit? Do you want to engage your customers and continue the conversation? Then ... you need to know about PURLs and how they can achieve all the above and more! <BR><BR>With <EM>PURLs for Profit </EM>you'll have your personal roadmap that will show you how to successfully implement and profit from PURLs. This definitive special report takes you step-by-step on how to integrate PURLs into your marketing mix — email, direct mail, landing pages and social media — for an enhanced user experience so that prospects can make more informed purchasing decisions faster. <BR><BR>Here are just a few of the important takeaways you'll learn:<BR>
<UL>
<LI>Why PURLs work 
<LI>How PURLs connect the dots between direct mail, email, social media and the web 
<LI>What you should test and why 
<LI>What campaigns benefit most from PURLs 
<LI>How to create a relevant campaign 
<LI>Privacy and PURLs 
<LI>What steps should you take 
<LI>How to measure your ROI 
<LI>Maintain the magic by maximizing the message, the creative and the list! 
<LI>The importance of tracking and continuing the conversation 
<LI>Where social media fits into the mix </LI></UL>
<P>In addition, you'll see actual case studies where PURLs have made a big difference in a variety of marketing efforts. <BR><BR>Here's a list of the types of companies and organizations that are featured in this informative special report: </P>
<UL>
<LI>Financial Services 
<LI>Higher Education 
<LI>Publishing 
<LI>Nonprofit 
<LI>Retail 
<LI>Technology 
<LI>Seminar/Conference 
<LI>Quick-Service Restaurant</LI></UL>
<P>Download your copy of <EM>PURLs for Profit</EM> today!</P> PURLs for Profit

Available as a PDF

Your everything-you-need-to-know guide to personalized URLs, including: Best Practices on why they work, campaign strategy, multichannel creative, analytics, and 10 Case Studies.

A New Best Practices and Case Studies report from DirectMarketingIQ.

Do you want a higher response rate? Do you want to make a bigger profit? Do you





...

ORDER NOW

 

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Martin Gross-Albenhausen - Posted on January 25, 2008
Problem is that #2 can work against you. One of the leading German conference companies keeps mailing big volumes of blank OEs. As they are hitting the mailbox every other day, usually they end up in the circular file without being opened. The response rates are ridiculous, and every so often I hear "I didn't even notice they had this conference. With the right teaser on the outer, they would at least appeal to the appropriate audience.
Andrew Yoelin - Posted on January 23, 2008
Less is more unless it isn't.

What I think is missing in this discussion/article is the target. For example, when Boardroom/Bottomline put on the outside envelope, "What Not To Eat On An Airline, p.22" they sold about $1 billion dollars worth of product. Billion. Why? Because the people they mailed to were frequent flyers and wanted to know what not to eat on an airline. The more appropriate the message - inside or outside - the better the readership, the better the response. Saving it all for the inside might be conservative enough to not get the thing read.
Karen Riley - Posted on January 23, 2008
Hmmmm ...

Less is more in some instances, but I'm not so sure about a future becoming increasingly minimal. I would think it would depend on the audience, the vehicle, and the overall reaction one is tring to entice?

For instance, if I'm doing a subscription renewal, I'm a big fan of the soft-spoken, official-looking OE. (Although I'll be the first to admit, that all of the standard Statement of Benefits packags are starting to show dramatic fatigue.) But if I'm selling a product in a 6x9 one-shot package, shouldn't we still 'scream' a little?

OEs are one of my favorite territories to explore. Might not close the deal, but sure starts it.

Good post -- and ditto -- Test Test Test!
Karen
Mark Pilipczuk - Posted on January 23, 2008
I agree that in case #2, you don't want to clutter up an OE featuring a well-known name with a lot of hype.

I'm not so sure about #3 though. I've been getting a lot more of the blank/minimalist OEs recently and, as i can't tell what they are, I tend to chuck 'em. As it's clear--though the way the mail is addressed and the indicia--that it's advertising mail, why not help the carrier achieve the second of it's two objectives? (The first being to prevent the contents from spilling into the street and the second is getting it opened.)

I've had more success, even with minimalist OEs, with just a subtle offer or teaser.

YMMV, of course, and test, test, test!
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Martin Gross-Albenhausen - Posted on January 25, 2008
Problem is that #2 can work against you. One of the leading German conference companies keeps mailing big volumes of blank OEs. As they are hitting the mailbox every other day, usually they end up in the circular file without being opened. The response rates are ridiculous, and every so often I hear "I didn't even notice they had this conference. With the right teaser on the outer, they would at least appeal to the appropriate audience.
Andrew Yoelin - Posted on January 23, 2008
Less is more unless it isn't.

What I think is missing in this discussion/article is the target. For example, when Boardroom/Bottomline put on the outside envelope, "What Not To Eat On An Airline, p.22" they sold about $1 billion dollars worth of product. Billion. Why? Because the people they mailed to were frequent flyers and wanted to know what not to eat on an airline. The more appropriate the message - inside or outside - the better the readership, the better the response. Saving it all for the inside might be conservative enough to not get the thing read.
Karen Riley - Posted on January 23, 2008
Hmmmm ...

Less is more in some instances, but I'm not so sure about a future becoming increasingly minimal. I would think it would depend on the audience, the vehicle, and the overall reaction one is tring to entice?

For instance, if I'm doing a subscription renewal, I'm a big fan of the soft-spoken, official-looking OE. (Although I'll be the first to admit, that all of the standard Statement of Benefits packags are starting to show dramatic fatigue.) But if I'm selling a product in a 6x9 one-shot package, shouldn't we still 'scream' a little?

OEs are one of my favorite territories to explore. Might not close the deal, but sure starts it.

Good post -- and ditto -- Test Test Test!
Karen
Mark Pilipczuk - Posted on January 23, 2008
I agree that in case #2, you don't want to clutter up an OE featuring a well-known name with a lot of hype.

I'm not so sure about #3 though. I've been getting a lot more of the blank/minimalist OEs recently and, as i can't tell what they are, I tend to chuck 'em. As it's clear--though the way the mail is addressed and the indicia--that it's advertising mail, why not help the carrier achieve the second of it's two objectives? (The first being to prevent the contents from spilling into the street and the second is getting it opened.)

I've had more success, even with minimalist OEs, with just a subtle offer or teaser.

YMMV, of course, and test, test, test!