Target Marketing

You will be automatically redirected to targetmarketingmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

How to Communicate via E-mail

The Perils of Landing Page Limbo

November 2006 By Denny Hatch
10

In the News

BTL Monthly
Personal letter from the CEO of Titan Holdings (TTGL) as they anticipate higher profit margins … Thu Nov 02, 2006 23k
—From Denny Hatch’s Yahoo Inbox, Nov. 3, 2006

E-mail, on the other hand, costs virtually nothing, which means that e-mailers don’t need to know any rules. They can be very sloppy, mail billions, achieve minuscule results and still make a little money.

At last count by Postini.com, 87.3 percent of all e-mail is Spam—even with the CAN SPAM law. Legitimate e-marketers have an avalanche of competition.

Putting Direct Mail Rules to Work in E-mail—the Subject Line
The subject line, “A personal letter from the CEO …” piqued my interest. It was the equivalent of the envelope in direct mail. “The only purpose of the carrier envelope, other than keeping its contents from spilling out onto the street, is to get itself opened,” said legendary copywriter Herschell Gordon Lewis.

If the envelope isn’t opened, the entire mailing is wasted. The great freelance wordsmith, Mel Martin, whose stunningly brilliant direct mail copy turned Boardroom into a $100 million business, would spend a week or more on envelope teaser copy. Hard-wired into Martin’s psyche was Lea Pierce’s dictum, “All direct mail gets opened over the trash can.”

Same thing with the e-mail subject line. It must be a powerhouse, because it’s a mouse click away from oblivion.

A Meaningful Subject Line Is Also Essential for Personal E-mail
When I hit the computer in the morning and go to Yahoo or AOL, I click on the box that marks all e-mails and I scan the subject lines quickly. If a subject line looks interesting, I check the sender. If the sender and the subject line look reasonable, they are unmarked. Then I hit “DELETE” and everything else is cleared out. In less than a minute, I’ve reduced the list of messages in my in-box by 90 percent—turning 50 e-mails into a manageable four or five. Do I miss some stuff that I should see? Yes. But if it’s important, the person will re-send or call me on the phone to alert me that an important e-mail is coming and to be on the lookout for it.

Direct Mail Once the Envelope Is Opened—What You See First
Top direct mail professionals pay attention to every facet of a mailing, including the order in which the individual elements are inserted into the envelope. If using a window envelope, the prospect’s address on the order card must show through the window.

Since envelopes are almost always turned over and opened from the flap side, a standard rule of thumb is to make sure that the letter is inserted with the letterhead and salutation facing out, causing it to be the first element that the prospect sees. That’s why the late guru, Dick Benson, said, “A letter should look and feel like a letter.” If it’s on glossy paper and printed in the same typeface as the circular—and contains boxes, big headlines, pictures and charts, it will not be immediately obvious which piece is which.

The other pieces are inserted between the letter in the back and the order card in the front circular, lift note(s), freemium, business reply envelope, etc.

For all the care taken with folding and inserting, the mailer still has no control over which element the prospect will read first. A right-brain person, who processes information emotionally and irrationally, will want to read the letter first to make a personal connection with the writer and to see the benefit-oriented “you” copy—what this product or service will do for you.

A left-brain person with an analytical, rational mind, will go for the circular or demonstrator for its illustrations, charts, photographs and “it” copy that shows and describes “it”, the product or service being offered.

I always look at the order card first so I can see what the deal is right away before wasting time on an offer that doesn’t interest me.

Each of these elements is written and designed to tell the story in a different way and appeal to a different emotion.

E-mail—the Landing Page
Unlike direct mail, the e-mailer can control what the prospect sees and in what order.

For example, on the subject line from Titan Holdings, I was promised a “personal letter from the CEO.” That is what I was expecting—something personal and emotional from the CEO and the company.

Instead, I received a complex press release—a PR- and lawyer-driven page that was a cross between an annual report and a stock tout sheet called “Business to Leisure Monthly.” In two dense columns were the “Top 5 Reasons to Watch the Stock of Titan Global Holdings, Inc.,” a press release about higher profit margins, and an offer to send information “to interested readers only.”

After searching, I finally found the “letter” buried in the left-hand column in the same type as everything else. Sandwiched in between “Dear Investor” and a signature block of CEO Brian Chance (but no signature) was a bunch of PR-written hype about the company that had been clearly flyspecked by lawyers. It looked and sounded like everything else on the page.

Elsewhere were 225 words on “Forward Looking Statements,” 124 words “About Business to Leisure Monthly (BTL.com),” and the piece closed with a 370-word “DISCLAIMER” in mousetype.

Along the way, I was invited to click on any of the 13 hyperlinks in blue.

The Legacy of the Dot-Com Whiz Kids—Landing Page Limbo
Web designers are proud of their Web sites and like to show off all the neat stuff they have created. Landing pages are frequently loaded with superfluous information and hyperlinks that can send a visitor off on wild goose chases: FAQs, Press Room, About Us, Privacy Statement, Contact, Press, News Stories, Investor Information, Webmaster and other cockamamie places that serve as distractions.

Suddenly, visitors find themselves in Landing Page Limbo and forget why they’re there.

The beauty of e-commerce is that the marketer can control what the prospect sees every step of the way. Not only that, but it’s possible to track where the prospects go and see precisely what’s working and what’s not.

Where direct mail tests require six or eight weeks to get information like this, it can be obtained practically in real time on the Web and then changed and tweaked instantly at virtually no cost.

What’s more, if you have two or three satellite sites and automatically alternate the visitors, you can have A-B-C split tests, make changes and read winners and losers in minutes.

Once you have found a right combination of offers, messages and designs that keep the highest percentage of visitors enthralled up to the point of ordering, these elements can be converted into direct mail and space ads. Nothing like this has ever before been possible for marketers.

Using Web tracking software, you can amass a wealth of test information in three hours that would normally take two years to collect using snail mail—and at 1/100,000th of the cost.

And yet, the legacy of the failed dot-commers of 1998-2000 persists. Instead of making a personal connection with me—as promised in the subject line—I was fed emotionless corporate palaver all in the same typeface, tone and terminology, followed by a cover-your-a** disclaimer in case it was all a lie.

This is emphatically not the way to communicate.

Takeaway Points to Consider:

* In planning an e-mail campaign, decide precisely what action you want from the recipients, get inside their heads and figure out the information that they will need to respond. Don’t give them too much. “Confuse ‘em, ya lose ‘em,” said guru consultant Paul Goldberg.

* For your e-mail to get opened, the subject line is everything.

* A letter is different from a brochure is different from an order mechanism is different from a lift note. This is true in e-commerce as well as direct mail. If everything looks alike, the power of your words is lost in the dreary sameness of it all.

* Design is the stage setting for your words. Words sell. Design doesn’t. Don’t allow the designer to dominate.

* Don’t automatically include a Web site on a mailing piece or off-the-page advertisement. Rather, test it with and without. The reason: If you’ve made a persuasive argument and the prospects are about to respond, they will be distracted by a URL. Their concentration will be broken and they will think, “Ah, maybe I should look at the Web site first.” Whereupon the mailing or ad is laid aside and you have lost the response.

* “Make it easy to order,” said Elsworth Howell, founder of Grolier Enterprises. If your mailing piece or ad sends responders to a Web site, create a special URL that takes them to a page directly relating to the message that they have just seen. Many marketers simply list the generic homepage, whereupon responders are consigned to roaming around Landing Page Limbo, and you have lost the order, donation or inquiry.

* When was the last time you took a critical look at your home page/landing page? Does that dog hunt? Or has it been screwed around with by so many people that it has become Landing Page Limbo?

Web Sites Related to Today's Edition:

The Text (not the Design) of the Titan “Personal Letter” E-mail
http://tinyurl.com/y5bzev/

Titan Global Holdings
http://www.titanglobalholdings.com/
 
10

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Lea Pierce - Posted on November 15, 2006
P.S. My new corollary to "all direct mail gets opened over the trash can" is "all email gets opened over the delete button."
Lea Pierce - Posted on November 15, 2006
As usual, I find myself nodding "yes... yes... yes" to your comments, Denny, especially: "Using Web tracking software, you can amass a wealth of test information in three hours that would normally take two years to collect using snail mail?and at 1/100,000th of the cost.>

My gripe is that, with a couple of bright-spot exceptions who take e-commerce very seriously and are doing very well, I keep running into clients who will not take the time to really leverage the incredible testing power of the web. We can test, literally, punctuation if we want to. What I see is a lot of lazyness... clients who want a "magic bullet" email as they want a "magic bullet" letter that will cost nothing, pull like crazy, and never wear out. The truth, as you point out, is that e-dm is every bit as demanding and technique-intensive as snail-dm. Hershell Gordon Lewis' maxim of "verisimillitude" holds just as true in e-dm, and a "personal message from..." subject line better deliver a personal message.

I do have one quibble, which is "Design is the stage setting for your words. Words sell. Design doesn?t. Don?t allow the designer to dominate."

As with snail-dm, if the words are poorly designed, readership goes down. I think this factor -- sheer visual readability -- is even more critical on the web. So while I agree that designers should never dominate, I find myself working even more closely with designers who "get it" to create sales messages that are fast reads,compelling, and make saying "YES, TAKE MY MONEY' quick and seamless.

Thanks again for another pungent, timely, incisive chunk o' common sense!

Lea Pierce
David Frey - Posted on November 08, 2006
Hi Denny:

This is David Frey over at http://www.MarketingBestPractices.com

In your recent newsletter about email marketing you mention
the importance of NOT showing your website address with
your phone number as a primary response mechanism.

In my personal tests, my leads dropped by 50% when I displayed
my URL and my phone number. When I took my URL off, my
lead flow went back to normal.

I think putting a website address on the ad gives your prospect
the "path of least resistance" to get more information and they
get lost between the time they looked at the ad and when they
went to the website.

Good call Denny. :-)

David
Anthony Green - Posted on November 08, 2006
Denny,
You are so 'spot on' with this one! We use our best efforts to hold the reader?s attention in a mailing or off-page ad. We bring them to fever pitch with our words and offer and then say, ?Hold it! Why not check out our web site: www.youvejustlostthatorder.com?. And what are the chances that they will be reading your piece while sitting in front of their computer? It doesn?t make sense and goes against the grain of everything in the salesman?s rule book! It?s kamikaze mail order! If the offer is that good they?ll pick up the phone. The only thing I have yet to work out is what reason to give for not having a URL. It?s bound to create the wrong impression. Any ideas on that one?
You are, as always, an inspiration and always live up to the title of your newsletter. Keep up the good work.
Best wishes,
Anthony Green.

Rick Olson - Posted on November 07, 2006
I recieved a direct mail piece once that contained a "personal letter" from the CEO. Of course it was mass-personal, but it was signed and I used it as an entre to call on that CEO personally. I simply told his secretary that I was getting back to him from a personal letter I'd received and I was put right through (much to my surprise, I might add). The guy was a bit annoyed at my tactic but admitted it was fair and we got a chuckle out of it at least. I never got the deal but I did get through.
Dev. Kinney - Posted on November 07, 2006
Enjoyed this skread immensely, Denny. Your didactics are why MediaGraphics has always captured market share for our clients. Keep up the good work.
--Dev.
Carl Street - Posted on November 07, 2006
Is a hammer better than a screwdriver?

Depends upon what you need to accomplish. Marketing communication tasks run the gamut of simple "gee whiz" notices to complete fullfillment (consumated sales). Throughout that spectrum different strategies and tactics are necessary based upon the objective. In short, one design does NOT fit all and copy, design, media, etc. should be as carefully chosen as any skilled craftsman chooses his tools. Even in the "free" Email world, failed campaings have at least an opporunity cost; probably damage corporate images; and can be real well poisoners. The REAL Cost of failed marketing communications has rarely, if ever, been the cost of producing and delivering the message.

In today's competitive environment, marketing communications are NOT a playground for amateurs -- just because they lack a distribution cost. Any CEO/CFO who believes otherwise should transfer immediately to his building maintenance department before he puts his ship up on a reef. Hire a pro with a successful track record -- anything less is false economy.

Carl Street
carl_street@cjstreet.com
David Garfinkel - Posted on November 07, 2006
Once again, you hit the obvious. Except, it's not so obvious. It SHOULD be obvious, but very few people "get" how to create email messages that work.

Truth told, it's no different than writing a really well crafted direct mail letter. There's definitely skill (and not having a 'tin ear') involved in writing a message to the masses that comes across as personal to the reader.

But that's step two. Step one is for it to occur to the person writing that there needs to be congruence and emotional connection between the promise in the subject line and the delievered content in the body of the email. Most people don't even "get" that.

It's a shame... but... it's a bonanza for the few who do understand.
Larry Maher - Posted on November 07, 2006
Denny,

Thank you. This is the best summary of all that is right and wrong with e-mail marketing I have read in a long time. I am going to select a few choice portions and use them in my e-commerce and website design meeting tomorrow afternoon.
Your points are well documented, especially with the quotes from long-time experts in Direct Marketing and tie-ins with hard-copy rules. Keep up the good work!
John Fabian - Posted on November 07, 2006
Direct mail costs $50 - $75/M? Maybe in 1970, when 3rd class mail was 3.8 cents. Better proof that copy more carefully, Denny (BG).

Your comment about how traditional DM gets opened made me recall a story the late Bill Jayme told me years ago. He was on a cross-country flight and saw this man take one the mailings that Bill had created out of his briefcase. Bill thought, "Aha, at last I'm going to see what people actually look at first when they open a mailing... the letter, the brochure or the order form."

Whereupon the man opened the envelope, set aside the letter and brochure, looked at the BRC... and used it to clean his teeth (true story!!!)

John Fabian
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Lea Pierce - Posted on November 15, 2006
P.S. My new corollary to "all direct mail gets opened over the trash can" is "all email gets opened over the delete button."
Lea Pierce - Posted on November 15, 2006
As usual, I find myself nodding "yes... yes... yes" to your comments, Denny, especially: "Using Web tracking software, you can amass a wealth of test information in three hours that would normally take two years to collect using snail mail?and at 1/100,000th of the cost.>

My gripe is that, with a couple of bright-spot exceptions who take e-commerce very seriously and are doing very well, I keep running into clients who will not take the time to really leverage the incredible testing power of the web. We can test, literally, punctuation if we want to. What I see is a lot of lazyness... clients who want a "magic bullet" email as they want a "magic bullet" letter that will cost nothing, pull like crazy, and never wear out. The truth, as you point out, is that e-dm is every bit as demanding and technique-intensive as snail-dm. Hershell Gordon Lewis' maxim of "verisimillitude" holds just as true in e-dm, and a "personal message from..." subject line better deliver a personal message.

I do have one quibble, which is "Design is the stage setting for your words. Words sell. Design doesn?t. Don?t allow the designer to dominate."

As with snail-dm, if the words are poorly designed, readership goes down. I think this factor -- sheer visual readability -- is even more critical on the web. So while I agree that designers should never dominate, I find myself working even more closely with designers who "get it" to create sales messages that are fast reads,compelling, and make saying "YES, TAKE MY MONEY' quick and seamless.

Thanks again for another pungent, timely, incisive chunk o' common sense!

Lea Pierce
David Frey - Posted on November 08, 2006
Hi Denny:

This is David Frey over at http://www.MarketingBestPractices.com

In your recent newsletter about email marketing you mention
the importance of NOT showing your website address with
your phone number as a primary response mechanism.

In my personal tests, my leads dropped by 50% when I displayed
my URL and my phone number. When I took my URL off, my
lead flow went back to normal.

I think putting a website address on the ad gives your prospect
the "path of least resistance" to get more information and they
get lost between the time they looked at the ad and when they
went to the website.

Good call Denny. :-)

David
Anthony Green - Posted on November 08, 2006
Denny,
You are so 'spot on' with this one! We use our best efforts to hold the reader?s attention in a mailing or off-page ad. We bring them to fever pitch with our words and offer and then say, ?Hold it! Why not check out our web site: www.youvejustlostthatorder.com?. And what are the chances that they will be reading your piece while sitting in front of their computer? It doesn?t make sense and goes against the grain of everything in the salesman?s rule book! It?s kamikaze mail order! If the offer is that good they?ll pick up the phone. The only thing I have yet to work out is what reason to give for not having a URL. It?s bound to create the wrong impression. Any ideas on that one?
You are, as always, an inspiration and always live up to the title of your newsletter. Keep up the good work.
Best wishes,
Anthony Green.

Rick Olson - Posted on November 07, 2006
I recieved a direct mail piece once that contained a "personal letter" from the CEO. Of course it was mass-personal, but it was signed and I used it as an entre to call on that CEO personally. I simply told his secretary that I was getting back to him from a personal letter I'd received and I was put right through (much to my surprise, I might add). The guy was a bit annoyed at my tactic but admitted it was fair and we got a chuckle out of it at least. I never got the deal but I did get through.
Dev. Kinney - Posted on November 07, 2006
Enjoyed this skread immensely, Denny. Your didactics are why MediaGraphics has always captured market share for our clients. Keep up the good work.
--Dev.
Carl Street - Posted on November 07, 2006
Is a hammer better than a screwdriver?

Depends upon what you need to accomplish. Marketing communication tasks run the gamut of simple "gee whiz" notices to complete fullfillment (consumated sales). Throughout that spectrum different strategies and tactics are necessary based upon the objective. In short, one design does NOT fit all and copy, design, media, etc. should be as carefully chosen as any skilled craftsman chooses his tools. Even in the "free" Email world, failed campaings have at least an opporunity cost; probably damage corporate images; and can be real well poisoners. The REAL Cost of failed marketing communications has rarely, if ever, been the cost of producing and delivering the message.

In today's competitive environment, marketing communications are NOT a playground for amateurs -- just because they lack a distribution cost. Any CEO/CFO who believes otherwise should transfer immediately to his building maintenance department before he puts his ship up on a reef. Hire a pro with a successful track record -- anything less is false economy.

Carl Street
carl_street@cjstreet.com
David Garfinkel - Posted on November 07, 2006
Once again, you hit the obvious. Except, it's not so obvious. It SHOULD be obvious, but very few people "get" how to create email messages that work.

Truth told, it's no different than writing a really well crafted direct mail letter. There's definitely skill (and not having a 'tin ear') involved in writing a message to the masses that comes across as personal to the reader.

But that's step two. Step one is for it to occur to the person writing that there needs to be congruence and emotional connection between the promise in the subject line and the delievered content in the body of the email. Most people don't even "get" that.

It's a shame... but... it's a bonanza for the few who do understand.
Larry Maher - Posted on November 07, 2006
Denny,

Thank you. This is the best summary of all that is right and wrong with e-mail marketing I have read in a long time. I am going to select a few choice portions and use them in my e-commerce and website design meeting tomorrow afternoon.
Your points are well documented, especially with the quotes from long-time experts in Direct Marketing and tie-ins with hard-copy rules. Keep up the good work!
John Fabian - Posted on November 07, 2006
Direct mail costs $50 - $75/M? Maybe in 1970, when 3rd class mail was 3.8 cents. Better proof that copy more carefully, Denny (BG).

Your comment about how traditional DM gets opened made me recall a story the late Bill Jayme told me years ago. He was on a cross-country flight and saw this man take one the mailings that Bill had created out of his briefcase. Bill thought, "Aha, at last I'm going to see what people actually look at first when they open a mailing... the letter, the brochure or the order form."

Whereupon the man opened the envelope, set aside the letter and brochure, looked at the BRC... and used it to clean his teeth (true story!!!)

John Fabian