Target Marketing

You will be automatically redirected to targetmarketingmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

What Can You Profitably Outsource?

The Huffington Post model: outsourcing everything

May 2008 By Denny Hatch
13
Get the Flash Player to see this rotator.
 

In the News

TV News Stations Try Cooperation
NBC10 and Fox29 will, for a week, experiment with sharing video footage.

In an unusual experiment among network-owned local news stations, WCAU (NBC10) and WTXF (Fox29) are sharing some video footage this week. The arrangement, acknowledging the economics facing media as well as the redundancies in some coverage, is a test to “see if we can cooperate on some newsgathering in the field,” according to a memo circulated Monday to NBC10 staff by news director Chris Blackman. The cooperation, which both stations will assess at the end of a week, extends to events such as news conferences and other planned events that both stations would cover anyway, Blackman said in his memo, adding that “helicopter resources” also would be shared.
— Michael Klein, The Philadelphia Inquirer, April 23, 2008
In more jobs than I care to remember, my single objective was efficiency: How could the most value be created for the least cost, and then sold to delighted customers and eager prospects at the highest profit?

When I read last week that two Philadelphia TV stations—Fox29 and NBC10—are going to test the possibility of sharing video footage, I was intrigued. The idea that competing news gatherers would pool their resources is a breakthrough!

For example, CBS and CNN spend millions of dollars on equipment and personnel gathering news in Iraq, mostly going after the same stories, interviewing the same people and doing stand-up reporting from inside the Green Zone. Three weeks ago, The New York Times reported that CBS was negotiating to buy news feeds from CNN. Brilliant!

Alas, later that day, both Hollywood Reporter and Variety said it was rumor. “We’re extremely satisfied with and proud of our newsgathering operation,” a CBS spokesperson said. “No outside arrangements are being negotiated.”

Pride is a dumb reason to waste millions of dollars duplicating somebody else’s perfectly good work.

Four Hovering Helicopters
In the run-up to the Pennsylvania primary election, Barack Obama held a rally near the Wynnewood home of our friend Russell Perkins, the savvy proprietor of InfoCommerce Group. Perkins related that the four competing news helicopters hovered over the event for hours. Not only were they sucking up fuel, pilot salaries, camera operators and newsreaders, but also irritating the hell out of homeowners down below.

And for what? Four sets of identical footage. The whole preposterous exercise was the ego trip—the silly pride—of four competing news directors who could have sent up one helicopter, shared the results and paid a quarter of the cost each.

A Vestigial Business Model
Once upon a time, owning a local newspaper or radio or TV station meant having a monopoly on the community and a license to print money. No longer.

News and information now comes from many sources—old-fashioned newspapers, the Internet, 24/7 cable TV, the car radio and alerts on a cell phone. Advertising dollars are being spread around these myriad media. Craigslist is systematically destroying classified ad business. Change must come, or all local media will collectively die.

Outsource! Outsource! Outsource!
When my wife Peggy’s parents were alive, we used to visit them periodically in Montgomery, Alabama. Every morning there I read the Montgomery Advertiser, a Gannett paper.

Takeaway Points to Consider:

* In more jobs than I care to remember, my single objective was efficiency: How could the most value be created for the least cost, and then sold to delighted customers and eager prospects at the highest profit?

* The advantages of outsourcing—using consultants and freelancers
1. With consultants, you have top people with vast experience who are living by their wits working for you, so they must be good at what they do. If they were no good, people would not hire them.
2. It’s clean. No overhead, no benefits, no expense account (unless previously negotiated), no moving expenses, no tax deductions or bookkeeping. Get bill, pay bill.
3. Consultants frequently have wider industry experience than in-house people, and can call on the knowledge and experience of a wide circle of business contacts.
4. If either of you decide to fire the other, there is a minimum of angst (as opposed to a full-time employee).

* Disadvantages of using consultants and freelancers
1. The fee may be higher than you would pay in salary to a full-time employee.
2. Do not expect a consultant to be working exclusively for you. Other clients will also get attention.
3. Employees sometimes feel threatened and bring out the short swords to savage the work of outsiders. Good consultants will be sensitive to this and sell themselves to the Indians once they have sold themselves to the chiefs. But interpersonal relations can be a problem.

Web Sites Related to Today's Edition:

About Boardroom Inc.
http://tinyurl.com/6gmbtc

The Huffington Post
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/
 
13

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Steve Solomon - Posted on May 21, 2008
Denny, There used to be a news organization that handled all the news for a country -- perhaps you remember Pravda! Is that what you're proposing? By the way, this week the Philadelphia ABC affiliate (Channel 6), spurned outsourcing and sent a reporter to California for a week to cover behind the scenes of Dancing With The Stars. So there is a time and place for outsourcing, but it can't be the law of the land.
Sarah Clachar - Posted on May 08, 2008
Dennis,

As a freelance health copywriter I heartily endorse your analysis. And I have to add another benefit that you touched on a bit - It's sometimes easy, when you're developing a product, to get so caught up in it that you can't step outside and describe it well to a newcomer - your customer. You're already sold and, particularly in smaller businesses, everyone inside the organization is already caught up in this as well.

A freelancer can bring an outsider's perspective and can present your product to your prospects with greater success. The flip side is that sometimes we miss out on all those ad hoc and formal discussions that take place in developing the product in which some of the real gems for making sales come out. That's why, if you're going to use freelance marketing help, it's great to have these early meetings documented so you can just send them over to your hired consultant.
Jeffrey Weisman - Posted on May 07, 2008
It's too bad outsourcing has a bad name. The customer service people send us to India or the Philippines, if we're lucky ( a greater familiarity with American English and idioms). These experiences sully outsourcing.
But done right and thoughtfully, outsourcing other business aspects certainly presents an opportunity.
Arnold Howard - Posted on May 07, 2008
In the printing industry, the trend is to close in-plant printing departments and outsource to a commercial shop. However, a well run in-plant with the right equipment and within the right organization always produces at a lower cost than sending the work to a commercial shop. This is because the in-plant has no marketing costs.
Derek Baun - Posted on May 06, 2008
Aren't there media ownership laws that prevent one company from monopolizing news outlets? Sharing news would accomplish the same thing albeit legally. Sometimes redundancy is good.

Here's an idea for outsourcing. Is the American government legally allowed to outsource its military? If the government hired soldiers from other countries to serve, would we as a nation be as concerned about war since our sons and daughters wouldn't be in harm's way?
Mike McCormick - Posted on May 06, 2008
Hi Denny,
Two potential problems with centralized international newsgathering (AP and Reuters): 1) Blanditudiness, which will eventually bore us to tears and 2) What happens if AP and Reuters get corrupt? (Some folks seem to think they already have.)
The Huffington Post story is fascinating. The content is drivel but the business model makes sense. Can't beat that.
All the best, Mike McCormick
Max Bendel - Posted on May 06, 2008
Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Did Huffington adopt the Drudge model or vice versa? My sometimes weak relocation says she did, but I could be wrong.
norman sudduth - Posted on May 06, 2008
I hope you don't think this idea is new. please read Edwards Demming on quality control, about 1983. His analogy was 2 competing service stations, each with an idle wrecker sitting in front advertising towing services.
Ross Turney - Posted on May 06, 2008
I (used to ? recently downsized) work for an organization which develops training and management development educational and professional designation programs for the life and health insurance industry. Industry professionals comprise educational review committees which review the content for quality and relevancy. They?re ?top drawer? programs.
Yet some companies choose to develop in house programs which essentially cover the same content. I don?t understand why they would want to reinvent the wheel. If the objection is that their content would be customized, my reply is that they could accomplish the same customization within the current courses for a cost effective fee. At times maybe it is corporate ego which drives these reinventions, instead of buying programs from industry experts.
John - Posted on May 06, 2008
Denny,

Another great article. This was why the news organizations created the Associated Press in 1846. It was a good model then and is a good model now.

Best wishes,

John
PETER HOCHSTEIN - Posted on May 06, 2008
Dear Denny,

If every newspaper relied on a single "efficient" source of news like AP, there would have been no investigative report of what is now called Watergate.

There would have been no Ellsberg papers helping to bring the Viet Nam War to an end.

There would be a dearth of other stories uncovered over the years by by dogged journalists digging for hours, and tolerant editors and publishers, willing to spend the money fora story the other publications don't have.

Freelancers (I've been one of them for 16 years) have their uses. But news is a very special business, the only arm of democracy that is not part of government.

An uninformed or thinly informed public leads to tempests in teapots over flag pins. Real, in-depth reporting can't be done either on the cheap, or without competition breathing down every reporter's neck.
Bernie Malonson - Posted on May 06, 2008
Mr. Hatch,

Although admittedly not often, once in a great while I have to disagree with your perspective. Sometimes it makes sense to take advantage of others efficiencies, skills and expertise, especially when it is their focus. Mr. Edelston is willing to pay top dollar for this expertise rather than keep it in house. In other cases however, outsourcing if incorrectly applied can lead to a blind leading the blind syndrome. Just a few weeks ago for example you commented on ABC News' questions to the democratic candidates. ABC news "outsourced" the questions and rather than having a critical thinking debate, ended up asking about Flag pins! Effective outsourcing requires critical thought. It is not enough to be efficient, one must make sure that efficiency leads to effectiveness. There are far too many businesses (and governments) that in their quest for efficiency (privatize everything with no oversight, checks and/or balances) that have rendered themselves truly ineffective.

Cheers!
Michael Nossaman - Posted on May 06, 2008
Outsourcing implies a top-down, outward looking model. I think the better way to describe this new-age model is "collaboration."

The trick is to take a user-generated model and apply it to service and manufacturing firms.

Nice article.
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Steve Solomon - Posted on May 21, 2008
Denny, There used to be a news organization that handled all the news for a country -- perhaps you remember Pravda! Is that what you're proposing? By the way, this week the Philadelphia ABC affiliate (Channel 6), spurned outsourcing and sent a reporter to California for a week to cover behind the scenes of Dancing With The Stars. So there is a time and place for outsourcing, but it can't be the law of the land.
Sarah Clachar - Posted on May 08, 2008
Dennis,

As a freelance health copywriter I heartily endorse your analysis. And I have to add another benefit that you touched on a bit - It's sometimes easy, when you're developing a product, to get so caught up in it that you can't step outside and describe it well to a newcomer - your customer. You're already sold and, particularly in smaller businesses, everyone inside the organization is already caught up in this as well.

A freelancer can bring an outsider's perspective and can present your product to your prospects with greater success. The flip side is that sometimes we miss out on all those ad hoc and formal discussions that take place in developing the product in which some of the real gems for making sales come out. That's why, if you're going to use freelance marketing help, it's great to have these early meetings documented so you can just send them over to your hired consultant.
Jeffrey Weisman - Posted on May 07, 2008
It's too bad outsourcing has a bad name. The customer service people send us to India or the Philippines, if we're lucky ( a greater familiarity with American English and idioms). These experiences sully outsourcing.
But done right and thoughtfully, outsourcing other business aspects certainly presents an opportunity.
Arnold Howard - Posted on May 07, 2008
In the printing industry, the trend is to close in-plant printing departments and outsource to a commercial shop. However, a well run in-plant with the right equipment and within the right organization always produces at a lower cost than sending the work to a commercial shop. This is because the in-plant has no marketing costs.
Derek Baun - Posted on May 06, 2008
Aren't there media ownership laws that prevent one company from monopolizing news outlets? Sharing news would accomplish the same thing albeit legally. Sometimes redundancy is good.

Here's an idea for outsourcing. Is the American government legally allowed to outsource its military? If the government hired soldiers from other countries to serve, would we as a nation be as concerned about war since our sons and daughters wouldn't be in harm's way?
Mike McCormick - Posted on May 06, 2008
Hi Denny,
Two potential problems with centralized international newsgathering (AP and Reuters): 1) Blanditudiness, which will eventually bore us to tears and 2) What happens if AP and Reuters get corrupt? (Some folks seem to think they already have.)
The Huffington Post story is fascinating. The content is drivel but the business model makes sense. Can't beat that.
All the best, Mike McCormick
Max Bendel - Posted on May 06, 2008
Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Did Huffington adopt the Drudge model or vice versa? My sometimes weak relocation says she did, but I could be wrong.
norman sudduth - Posted on May 06, 2008
I hope you don't think this idea is new. please read Edwards Demming on quality control, about 1983. His analogy was 2 competing service stations, each with an idle wrecker sitting in front advertising towing services.
Ross Turney - Posted on May 06, 2008
I (used to ? recently downsized) work for an organization which develops training and management development educational and professional designation programs for the life and health insurance industry. Industry professionals comprise educational review committees which review the content for quality and relevancy. They?re ?top drawer? programs.
Yet some companies choose to develop in house programs which essentially cover the same content. I don?t understand why they would want to reinvent the wheel. If the objection is that their content would be customized, my reply is that they could accomplish the same customization within the current courses for a cost effective fee. At times maybe it is corporate ego which drives these reinventions, instead of buying programs from industry experts.
John - Posted on May 06, 2008
Denny,

Another great article. This was why the news organizations created the Associated Press in 1846. It was a good model then and is a good model now.

Best wishes,

John
PETER HOCHSTEIN - Posted on May 06, 2008
Dear Denny,

If every newspaper relied on a single "efficient" source of news like AP, there would have been no investigative report of what is now called Watergate.

There would have been no Ellsberg papers helping to bring the Viet Nam War to an end.

There would be a dearth of other stories uncovered over the years by by dogged journalists digging for hours, and tolerant editors and publishers, willing to spend the money fora story the other publications don't have.

Freelancers (I've been one of them for 16 years) have their uses. But news is a very special business, the only arm of democracy that is not part of government.

An uninformed or thinly informed public leads to tempests in teapots over flag pins. Real, in-depth reporting can't be done either on the cheap, or without competition breathing down every reporter's neck.
Bernie Malonson - Posted on May 06, 2008
Mr. Hatch,

Although admittedly not often, once in a great while I have to disagree with your perspective. Sometimes it makes sense to take advantage of others efficiencies, skills and expertise, especially when it is their focus. Mr. Edelston is willing to pay top dollar for this expertise rather than keep it in house. In other cases however, outsourcing if incorrectly applied can lead to a blind leading the blind syndrome. Just a few weeks ago for example you commented on ABC News' questions to the democratic candidates. ABC news "outsourced" the questions and rather than having a critical thinking debate, ended up asking about Flag pins! Effective outsourcing requires critical thought. It is not enough to be efficient, one must make sure that efficiency leads to effectiveness. There are far too many businesses (and governments) that in their quest for efficiency (privatize everything with no oversight, checks and/or balances) that have rendered themselves truly ineffective.

Cheers!
Michael Nossaman - Posted on May 06, 2008
Outsourcing implies a top-down, outward looking model. I think the better way to describe this new-age model is "collaboration."

The trick is to take a user-generated model and apply it to service and manufacturing firms.

Nice article.