Target Marketing

You will be automatically redirected to targetmarketingmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

The Secrets of Successful Investing

Peter Lynch’s Almighty Crayon

August 2007 By Denny Hatch
7

In the News

Credit Time Bomb Ticked, but Few Heard
How Missed Signs Contributed to a Mortgage Meltdown
As far back as 2001, advocates for low-income homeowners had argued that mortgage providers were making loans to borrowers without regard to their ability to repay. Many could not even scrape together the money for a down payment and were being approved with little or no documentation of their income or assets.
—Nelson D. Schwartz and Vikas Bajaj, The New York Times, August 19, 2007
Two recent headlines encapsulate the current financial wreck—the mortgage crisis that has ensnared the markets across the globe and may threaten the economy of the entire world:

OVER THEIR HEADS: Small Investors, Too, Get Nailed by Arcane Trades
The Wall Street Journal, August 14, 2007

INVESTORS MULL HOW TO GET OUT OF HEDGE FUNDS: Market Turmoil Highlights Notoriously Tricky Rules for Redeeming Shares.
The Wall Street Journal, August 15, 2007

The words “over their heads” and “tricky” caught my attention.

Investors are being hosed these days by Wall Street sharpies that have come up with highly complex, tricky and incomprehensible schemes that are over everyone’s head—including those that dreamed them up.

You and I are being hosed by these sharpies, too. They cried “WOLF”—just as they did in the 1980 Savings & Loan Crisis—and the federal government and central banks have injected billions into the markets. As taxpayers, we are bailing out the greedy, incompetent bastards.

If you read nothing else this week or this month (or this year), commit to memory the following advice from Peter Lynch, the retired wizard of Fidelity Investments:

Never invest in any idea you can’t illustrate with a crayon.

A Quick History of the Subprime Mortgage Mess
In the August 15 edition of The Wall Street Journal, Aaron Lucchetti and Serena Ng reported the spark that ignited the worldwide economic conflagration that we are seeing today:

In 2000, Standard & Poor’s made a decision about an arcane corner of the mortgage market. It said a type of mortgage that involves a “piggyback,” where borrowers simultaneously take out a second loan for the down payment, was no more likely to default than a standard mortgage.

While its pronouncement went unnoticed outside the mortgage world, piggybacks soon were part of a movement that transformed America’s home-loan industry: a boom in “subprime” mortgages taken out by buyers with weak credit.


In other words, it was okay for people with no money that wanted to buy a home to borrow money for the down payment and then borrow more money for a mortgage.

To encourage home ownership—the great American dream—the patriotic mortgage companies came up with the idea of a very low “teaser” fixed rate that automatically turned into a variable rate mortgage after a year or two. Thus a starting rate of 6.6% winds up at 9.6% in a few years.

Takeaway Points to Consider:

* “Never invest in any idea you can’t illustrate with a crayon.”
Peter Lynch

* “Go for a business that any idiot can run—because sooner or later, any idiot probably is going to run it.”
—Peter Lynch

* This past July, the stock market rose on news that June sales of Wal-Mart beat Wall Street’s expectations. My wife, Peggy, who handles all the family finances shook her head in disbelief. “Wal-Mart customers are the measure of consumer confidence and a reason for stocks to go up?” she muttered. “This is preposterous!”

* Peggy, as usual, was spot-on. In August, shares in Wal-Mart dropped 5% on news that earnings were down for July. A huge price-cutting campaign at Wal-Mart designed to prime the sales pump failed because of the rocky housing market and the high cost of gasoline. “Many customers are running out of money at the end of the month,” said H. Lee Scott, Jr., the chief executive of Wal-Mart.

* If your business model is pinned to people that “are running out of money at the end of the month” and cannot pay their bills, change the business model or update your résumé and send it out.

* Of the seven key copy drivers, the emotional hot buttons that change behavior, greed is the most powerful.

* Never invest in something that you are uncomfortable with. Remember how Warren Buffett was reviled as an old fuddy-duddy because he refused to invest in dot-com companies because he did not understand the business model and nobody was making any money.

* Some corporations and mutual funds are fine investments. As an institution, Wall Street stinks.

Web Sites Related to Today's Edition:

Q&A: Peter Lynch on Investing in Volatile Markets
http://tinyurl.com/5qkhe

Peter Lynch’s Principles
http://tinyurl.com/yqglca

Bear Stearns
http://www.bearstearns.com/

Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
http://www.berkshirehathaway.com

Warren Buffett’s Letters to Shareholders
http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/letters.html
 
7

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Jim H - Posted on August 31, 2007
Yes, we all want to blame the hedge fund guys for this mess - and they should be blamed. But you also repeat the story of Mario and Letitia Montes who bought a house with an adjustable mortgage that at the start was already taking a sinfully high portion of their income. They were surprised that the mortgage adjusted upwards at the contractual time?

This whole situation was based on the assumption that housing prices would continue to appreciate at a 10% rate a year - unsustainable for any long term period. How could lenders give mortgages in the subprime market? Housing prices would continue to go up, so if the borrower defaulted, the lender would be made whole. Until housing prices now longer went up at that rate. Who couldn't see that coming? The hedge fund thieves desrve prison, but I have no sympathy for Mario and Letitia Montes.
Lawrence - Posted on August 24, 2007
Let me see?.giving big loans to people who don't have the means to pay them back. Is that a good business model? DUH!!! The scam would have continued running if the housing market had remained brisk and house prices continued to rise. The over-extended homeowners would just have to hang on for a year or two, sell their house for a big gain, and pay off the loan?..so they could go out and buy another house they couldn't really afford.

Mercury Finance was my family's intro to the lunacy of the sub-prime industry. My parents ended up with some stock in the company because they owned shares of the (legit) bank holding company that started Mercury. The Mercury stock went nuts, going through multiple splits until my parents' holding was worth 10 times what they started with. Right about the time my dad started thinking it was time to get out, Mercury crashed and burned. None of the real family assets were lost, but a paper fortune did go up in smoke. But to this day "Mercury Finance" is our code for "corporate scam."

Bottom line: Don't live beyond your means. And if the return on an investment seems too good to be true, sell out.
Jason Scheiner - Posted on August 24, 2007
There's only one type of honest person I can imagine will benefit from this: someone who wants to own his or her first home but didn't buy into the "100% loan" BS, and who has been biding time for when this mess will increase foreclosures and reduce the cost of purchasing a home.
David Garfinkel - Posted on August 23, 2007
Denny, I remember in the late 90s, living in the San Francisco Bay Area, I wanted to spend a lot of time hiding under furniture because of the crash I just knew was coming. As a direct marketer (or maybe just as a common sense business person), I couldn't see how the dot-com boom could sustain. And sure enough, the air came whooshing out of the bubble and lots of people lost lots of money.

Same thing with the subprime mess. I saw it coming. I spent eight years as a journalist covering the housing industry. But it didn't take any special knowledge to see that people borrowing over their heads on variable rate mortgages, and those people doing so in great numbers, were eventually headed for a fall. And sure enough, last week, as Countrywide almost went belly-up, whoosh went the air out of the bubble.

Who's to blame? I don't know. Maybe the borrowers AND the lenders, for colluding on what was basically a bad idea to begin with. Why people keep doing such stupid things is beyond me.
Bob Knight - Posted on August 23, 2007
A piece of trivia re: when is something investing and when is it gambling? Edward O. Thorp has made millions with hedge funds and is still in the investment business with his own company. His first claim to fame: he perfected card counting to beat blackjack.
Lou - Posted on August 23, 2007
Who's at fault here? I would love to just beat up on the lenders, because they came up with these ridiculous mortgage schemes. But the borrowers who jumped at these loans don't have half a brain or they would have seen their own risk. And the investors -- to buy into this kind of lending is just plain greedy and unconscionable, which is worse than having only half a brain. Does anybody remember Mercury Finance? Five minutes of research would have revealed what a bad (if not evil) idea that was. Did anyone learn from that? Nope.
David Culbertson - Posted on August 23, 2007
Once again, spot on Denny. As with the S&L crisis, a small group of people played loosely with other people's money leading to financial catastrophe but (so far) manage to insulate themselves against the consequences. Could be another taxpayer-funded bailout coming here.

And for those who will complain that the homeowners should have been savvier about the loans they took...don't ever underestimate peoples desire to want to own a home and think positively about the future. That puts most folks at a real disadvantage when mortage money is dangling in front of them.
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Jim H - Posted on August 31, 2007
Yes, we all want to blame the hedge fund guys for this mess - and they should be blamed. But you also repeat the story of Mario and Letitia Montes who bought a house with an adjustable mortgage that at the start was already taking a sinfully high portion of their income. They were surprised that the mortgage adjusted upwards at the contractual time?

This whole situation was based on the assumption that housing prices would continue to appreciate at a 10% rate a year - unsustainable for any long term period. How could lenders give mortgages in the subprime market? Housing prices would continue to go up, so if the borrower defaulted, the lender would be made whole. Until housing prices now longer went up at that rate. Who couldn't see that coming? The hedge fund thieves desrve prison, but I have no sympathy for Mario and Letitia Montes.
Lawrence - Posted on August 24, 2007
Let me see?.giving big loans to people who don't have the means to pay them back. Is that a good business model? DUH!!! The scam would have continued running if the housing market had remained brisk and house prices continued to rise. The over-extended homeowners would just have to hang on for a year or two, sell their house for a big gain, and pay off the loan?..so they could go out and buy another house they couldn't really afford.

Mercury Finance was my family's intro to the lunacy of the sub-prime industry. My parents ended up with some stock in the company because they owned shares of the (legit) bank holding company that started Mercury. The Mercury stock went nuts, going through multiple splits until my parents' holding was worth 10 times what they started with. Right about the time my dad started thinking it was time to get out, Mercury crashed and burned. None of the real family assets were lost, but a paper fortune did go up in smoke. But to this day "Mercury Finance" is our code for "corporate scam."

Bottom line: Don't live beyond your means. And if the return on an investment seems too good to be true, sell out.
Jason Scheiner - Posted on August 24, 2007
There's only one type of honest person I can imagine will benefit from this: someone who wants to own his or her first home but didn't buy into the "100% loan" BS, and who has been biding time for when this mess will increase foreclosures and reduce the cost of purchasing a home.
David Garfinkel - Posted on August 23, 2007
Denny, I remember in the late 90s, living in the San Francisco Bay Area, I wanted to spend a lot of time hiding under furniture because of the crash I just knew was coming. As a direct marketer (or maybe just as a common sense business person), I couldn't see how the dot-com boom could sustain. And sure enough, the air came whooshing out of the bubble and lots of people lost lots of money.

Same thing with the subprime mess. I saw it coming. I spent eight years as a journalist covering the housing industry. But it didn't take any special knowledge to see that people borrowing over their heads on variable rate mortgages, and those people doing so in great numbers, were eventually headed for a fall. And sure enough, last week, as Countrywide almost went belly-up, whoosh went the air out of the bubble.

Who's to blame? I don't know. Maybe the borrowers AND the lenders, for colluding on what was basically a bad idea to begin with. Why people keep doing such stupid things is beyond me.
Bob Knight - Posted on August 23, 2007
A piece of trivia re: when is something investing and when is it gambling? Edward O. Thorp has made millions with hedge funds and is still in the investment business with his own company. His first claim to fame: he perfected card counting to beat blackjack.
Lou - Posted on August 23, 2007
Who's at fault here? I would love to just beat up on the lenders, because they came up with these ridiculous mortgage schemes. But the borrowers who jumped at these loans don't have half a brain or they would have seen their own risk. And the investors -- to buy into this kind of lending is just plain greedy and unconscionable, which is worse than having only half a brain. Does anybody remember Mercury Finance? Five minutes of research would have revealed what a bad (if not evil) idea that was. Did anyone learn from that? Nope.
David Culbertson - Posted on August 23, 2007
Once again, spot on Denny. As with the S&L crisis, a small group of people played loosely with other people's money leading to financial catastrophe but (so far) manage to insulate themselves against the consequences. Could be another taxpayer-funded bailout coming here.

And for those who will complain that the homeowners should have been savvier about the loans they took...don't ever underestimate peoples desire to want to own a home and think positively about the future. That puts most folks at a real disadvantage when mortage money is dangling in front of them.