Who May Be Spying on You ... and Why?
‘Gentlemen don’t read each other’s mail.’
—Secretary of State Henry L. Stimson, 1929
October 2006
By Denny Hatch
In the News
H-P’s Dunn Could Face Risks From TestimonyFormer Chairman’s Words To Congress May Be Used Against Her in a Trial
When former Hewlett-Packard Co. Chairman Patricia Dunn testified on Capitol Hill last week on the H-P spying scandal, one congressman asked her about some handwritten notes taken by H-P’s former general counsel. The notes indicated Ms. Dunn had been briefed on a ruse by H-P’s investigators to obtain people’s personal phone records in June 2005. Ms. Dunn’s response: “I’ve seen this for the first time now.” Yesterday, Ms. Dunn was booked in the Santa Clara, Calif., sheriff’s office on four felony counts of fraud and conspiracy and released on her own recognizance.
—Peter Waldman, The Wall Street Journal, Oct. 6, 2006
Down deep inside, I agree with Stimson; snooping on people gives me the creepy-crawlies.
Yet, in business and in war, it’s essential.
The Culture of Distrust
The news recently has been rife with stories of snooping by corporations, private individuals and the federal government:
* In her new memoir to be published this week, former Hewlett-Packard CEO Carly Fiorina describes her angst when private discussions with board members turned up in the media. “It is hard to convey how violated I felt,” she wrote. Subsequent to Fiorina’s firing in February 2005, leaks continued. Hewlett-Packard board Chairman Patricia Dunn allegedly contacted private detectives to find the leakers. Last week, Dunn and four others—including three outside investigators—were indicted attempting to obtain the phone records of Hewlett-Packard directors suspected of revealing confidential information to the press.
* New York State Republican candidate for attorney general, Jeanine Pirro, is being investigated for possibly hiring former New York City Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik to illegally tape conversations of her husband whom she suspected of having an affair. The brouhaha isn’t helpful to Pirro’s campaign to become New York state’s chief law enforcement officer.
* This past February, celebrity Hollywood attorney Terry Christensen was indicted for conspiring with private detective Anthony (the Pelican) Pellicano for wiretapping the conversations of billionaire MGM boss Kirk Kerkorian’s ex-wife.
* In “The Man Who Made the Twenties Roar,” a biography of the early 20th-century Andrew Mellon, which was published this week, David Cannadine describes how the enormously wealthy entrepreneur in his 40s married a woman in her early twenties. Their sensational divorce, gleefully covered in the tabloids for two years, included accounts of Mellon accusing his wife of infidelity and her countercharges that he hired private detectives and used listening devices to catch her, ultimately to no avail.
* On Dec. 16, 2005, The New York Times revealed that “months after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, President Bush secretly authorized the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on Americans and others inside the United States ... without the court-approved warrants ordinarily required for domestic spying, according to government officials.”
Takeaway Points to Consider:
* If I had people working for me, I would expect a certain amount of personal business to be handled in the workplace—doctors’ appointments, child issues, dinner dates, etc. For example, I would rather have an employee spend the lunch break in the office ordering merchandise on the Internet and answering personal e-mails than running around a shopping mall only to return frazzled and out of sorts.* Presumably a hospitable office environment encourages people not to go out. This in turn should foster productivity.
* If a worker is talking on a cellphone, chances are company business isn’t being discussed. I realize people have lives, friends, families and schedules outside the workplace. I wouldn’t see an occasional cellphone call as a big deal.
* But what about the chronic goof-offs who spend hours surfing the Net, playing fantasy sports or Texas hold ‘em? If they meet or exceed their work quotas, does it matter what else they do, so long as they don’t give away company secrets or make fools of themselves? If they don’t have work quotas, I would set them and monitor the results.
* Having people on staff to spy on employees’ e-mails and phone conversations gives me the willies. What would be the return on investment in their salaries and benefits? What kind of creepy people would take such a job? What would happen to office morale and productivity if employees discovered corporate Big Brother was constantly looking over their shoulders?
* If I were running a company, I think I would make it very clear that no one’s spying on people but that the central computer system automatically saves everything—incoming and outgoing e-mails, instant messaging, phone records and Internet usage and that all of this information easily is retrievable. It seems to me this should put a damper on profligate time wasting.
* What’s your feeling about this, and what’s your corporate policy?
Web Sites Related to Today's Edition:
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/doj/fisa/
§ 2511. “Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited”
http://tinyurl.com/aqmmb/
Secretly Track Everything on a Computer
http://www.securetactics.com/monitor
Locating People Using GPS Enabled Cellphones
http://www.travelbygps.com/articles/tracking.php/ http://www.wherify.com/



