Target Marketing

You will be automatically redirected to targetmarketingmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

The Greatest TV Reporter in History

Communicate like Richard Dimbleby and success is guaranteed

September 2007 By Denny Hatch
9
Get the Flash Player to see this rotator.
 

In the News

Harry moves mourners to tears
BRITAIN’S Prince Harry called Princess Diana “the best mother in the world” at a memorial service on the 10th anniversary of her death today that reduced hundreds of public mourners outside the venue to tears.
—Katherine Haddon, Agence France-Presse, September 1, 2007
My wife, Peggy, and I are unabashed royal watchers. We subscribe—and look forward to every month—the Brit magazine, Majesty. Whenever we are in London, we try to visit the Queen’s Gallery off Buckingham Palace, because the Royal Family has one of the greatest private art collections in the world and the exhibitions there are changed regularly.

So surfing DirecTV over early morning coffee on Friday, August 31, I stumbled on the BBC live coverage of the memorial service commemorating the 10th anniversary of the death of Princess Diana and was hooked.

It is the BBC that invented TV coverage of great national events—funerals, coronations, state visits and weddings. In terms of preparation, what to say, when to speak and when to shut the hell up and let events unfold, no one does it better than the BBC.

If you are ever called upon to make a speech or give a business presentation, the person to emulate is the BBC’s—and television’s—greatest broadcast journalist, Richard Dimbleby.

The Dawn of Television
The beginning of the television age can be pegged to a precise date: June 2, 1953. Remarkably, the place was not the United States, but Westminster Abbey, London. The event was the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II, and the question of television coverage generated a serious brouhaha.

In the first place, it was felt by British upper classes that the coronation ceremony itself should not be available to the lower classes, because it might be watched by people drinking beer, wearing hats and carrying on conversations. In the words of the British Web site, www.whirligig-tv.co.uk:

The Coronation Joint Executive Committee was the body ultimately responsible for the Coronation arrangements and epitomized the Establishment of the times. This august group decided in the summer of 1952 that to have live television inside the Abbey during the Coronation would impose an intolerable emotional strain on the young Queen. The bright lights and their heat could easily prove to be a disastrously heavy burden on a long exhausting day.

Moreover, it would deprive a then privileged class of peers and peeresses of the exclusive opportunity of witnessing at first hand the crowning of the new Queen. The Cabinet reviewing the Coronation arrangements on 10 July 1952, agreed that no facilities should be provided for television inside the Abbey.

Takeaway Points to Consider:

* Richard Dimbleby did his homework and was never at a loss for words. Not just any words, but words that always informed and frequently inspired. At the wedding of Princess Margaret, he was forced to ad lib for 55 minutes while the crew of the Royal Yacht Britannia and millions of viewers waited for the honeymoon to begin. “He described everything in sight,” wrote the TimesJames Feron, “including five helicopters overhead that periodically drowned him out.”

* When making a speech or a business presentation, it is imperative to be completely prepared.

* Facts are more interesting—and memorable—than opinions.

* Try to anticipate every question that may be asked and have an answer.

* If a question stumps you, say simply, “I don’t know, but will have the answer for you by tomorrow morning.”

* The most irritating people in business are those that will not admit they do not know something.

* Choose your words carefully. Dimbleby did. So did the writers for TIME magazine from the 1920s to the 1960s. Check out TIME’s splendid prose from “The Flight of the Dimbleby” in the hyperlink below. By comparison, today’s broadcasters and magazine and newspaper writers are pathetic.

Web Sites Related to Today's Edition:

The Queen’s Gallery, Buckingham Palace
http://tinyurl.com/2jdho3

Richard Dimbleby with German family during WWII
http://tinyurl.com/3d2yde

Audio slideshow: Liberation of Belsen
http://tinyurl.com/2uqno5

Richard Dimbleby Narrating Queen Elizabeth’s Coronation (audio)
http://tinyurl.com/3algyr

BBC Telstar program 1962 Richard Dimbleby
http://tinyurl.com/2vnj5u

BBC Panorama early VT demo 1950s Richard Dimbleby
http://tinyurl.com/347v5s

Richard Dimbleby, Museum of Broadcast Communications Bio
http://tinyurl.com/ypzhls

“The Flight of the Dimbleby”— TIME
http://tinyurl.com/3xdrbo
 
9

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Valerie Lambert - Posted on September 06, 2007
BY FAR, the worst are sportscasters/commentators!

It also depends on the event, too.

Watching the US Open is eye opening! I happened to walk into the room during a women's event and was revolted by how much chatter was dedicated to what they were WEARING!

During the next (men's) match, I decided to add my OWN chatter: "Oh, and John...I see that HE'S opted not to go with the headband...only the wristband. Do you think that's wise? I see that he's getting sweaty already...Perhaps he should have gone with a shorter hairstyle...or at least a hat..."

My daughter and husband were cracking up, and it made the discrepancy all the more obvious!!

We usually mute sports when we watch. It's much more enjoyable. The commentators tell you very little that isn't on the screen anyway.
Kimberly Spear - Posted on September 06, 2007
Denny,
I sincerely look forward to your emails. Can't say that about too many that hit my inbox.
Have unsubscribed too many to count.
Refreshing and substantial is how I describe your writings.
I hope you are mentoring some young pups in your ways.
The next generation, wait this one, needs your unction.
Keep speaking.
Keep writing.

My best
Kimberly Spear
Tanja Sattler - Posted on September 06, 2007
Great piece! Thank you for the history and sage advice. Enjoyed the clip of Mr. Dimbleby. Tanja
Carolyn Baragona - Posted on September 06, 2007
Thank you for an enlightening and inspiring article/story!
Trish - Posted on September 06, 2007
Thank you for an history lesson in the media. Every time I hear "and how did you feel when...."--insert tragedy--I change the channel. I tune in for news and educated commentary--not belly-button opinion. If I wanted touchy-feely drivel, I would be watching Dr. Phil. Unfortnately, the amount of news required to constantly feed 24 hour news, government and sports channels has created a vacuum on the brains of those producing it. As marketers, if we aren't careful, the same thing happens to us.
David Culbertson - Posted on September 06, 2007
A well written and fascinating piece, Denny. From my perspective, Dimbleby and Murrow were great TV journalists/reporters because their origins were pre-tv, when detailed "on demand" news reports had to be delivered via radio. Dimbleby's "with the German family" shows his gift for descriptive oration.

Perhaps in today's environment, there is an eloquent podcaster who could become a new Dimbleby or Murrow.
Bill Gohde - Posted on September 06, 2007
I couldn't agree more with your assessment of the present crop of broadcasters. There's not enough room here to acommodate my rant. Incidentally, among the worst are sports broadcasters. Dimbleby was in class by himself. Thanks for sharing.
Jacqueline Sherrill - Posted on September 06, 2007
I always enjoy your articles, but this one I found especially enlightening. I have long felt that journalism today is a travesty. You demonstrated it beautifully.
And for the first time ever, I got a glimpse of what journalism is all about - certainly more than reading words on a sheet of paper!
Thank you for introducing me to an all-time great. Too bad those people who could learn the most from this article probably won't even read it.
Bill Bright - Posted on September 06, 2007
Well said, Mr. Hatch.
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Valerie Lambert - Posted on September 06, 2007
BY FAR, the worst are sportscasters/commentators!

It also depends on the event, too.

Watching the US Open is eye opening! I happened to walk into the room during a women's event and was revolted by how much chatter was dedicated to what they were WEARING!

During the next (men's) match, I decided to add my OWN chatter: "Oh, and John...I see that HE'S opted not to go with the headband...only the wristband. Do you think that's wise? I see that he's getting sweaty already...Perhaps he should have gone with a shorter hairstyle...or at least a hat..."

My daughter and husband were cracking up, and it made the discrepancy all the more obvious!!

We usually mute sports when we watch. It's much more enjoyable. The commentators tell you very little that isn't on the screen anyway.
Kimberly Spear - Posted on September 06, 2007
Denny,
I sincerely look forward to your emails. Can't say that about too many that hit my inbox.
Have unsubscribed too many to count.
Refreshing and substantial is how I describe your writings.
I hope you are mentoring some young pups in your ways.
The next generation, wait this one, needs your unction.
Keep speaking.
Keep writing.

My best
Kimberly Spear
Tanja Sattler - Posted on September 06, 2007
Great piece! Thank you for the history and sage advice. Enjoyed the clip of Mr. Dimbleby. Tanja
Carolyn Baragona - Posted on September 06, 2007
Thank you for an enlightening and inspiring article/story!
Trish - Posted on September 06, 2007
Thank you for an history lesson in the media. Every time I hear "and how did you feel when...."--insert tragedy--I change the channel. I tune in for news and educated commentary--not belly-button opinion. If I wanted touchy-feely drivel, I would be watching Dr. Phil. Unfortnately, the amount of news required to constantly feed 24 hour news, government and sports channels has created a vacuum on the brains of those producing it. As marketers, if we aren't careful, the same thing happens to us.
David Culbertson - Posted on September 06, 2007
A well written and fascinating piece, Denny. From my perspective, Dimbleby and Murrow were great TV journalists/reporters because their origins were pre-tv, when detailed "on demand" news reports had to be delivered via radio. Dimbleby's "with the German family" shows his gift for descriptive oration.

Perhaps in today's environment, there is an eloquent podcaster who could become a new Dimbleby or Murrow.
Bill Gohde - Posted on September 06, 2007
I couldn't agree more with your assessment of the present crop of broadcasters. There's not enough room here to acommodate my rant. Incidentally, among the worst are sports broadcasters. Dimbleby was in class by himself. Thanks for sharing.
Jacqueline Sherrill - Posted on September 06, 2007
I always enjoy your articles, but this one I found especially enlightening. I have long felt that journalism today is a travesty. You demonstrated it beautifully.
And for the first time ever, I got a glimpse of what journalism is all about - certainly more than reading words on a sheet of paper!
Thank you for introducing me to an all-time great. Too bad those people who could learn the most from this article probably won't even read it.
Bill Bright - Posted on September 06, 2007
Well said, Mr. Hatch.