Target Marketing

You will be automatically redirected to targetmarketingmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

Big Pharma: Modern Robber Barons

With vast pots of money, it happily breaks all the rules

Vol. 6, Issue No. 14 | July 20, 2010 By Denny Hatch
9

IN THE NEWS

FDA Panel Grants Avandia a Reprieve
A Food and Drug Administration advisory panel voted Wednesday to recommend allowing sales of the diabetes drug Avandia to continue, but said the drug poses a "significant safety" concern because it raises the risk of heart attacks …
Twelve of the panel's 33 members voted to remove the drug, and most of those who supported keeping Avandia on the market said they wanted more restrictions on its use. Many said their vote to retain Avandia was based on the lack of hard evidence about potential harm. They said Avandia should be used only if other diabetes' drugs don't work.

Alicia Mundy and Jennifer Corbett Dooren
The Wall Street Journal, July 15, 2010

Check out the July 15th story in the IN THE NEWS section at right.

The diabetes drug Avandia has been allowed to remain on the market even though a large percentage of the medical community believes it raises the risk of heart attacks and should be banned.

The next day, Avandia’s maker, GlaxoSmithKline, announced it had set aside $2.4 billion to settle lawsuits from consumers that believe they suffered harm from the drug.

Outrageous? Nah.

Business as usual in the gazillion-dollar world of Pharmaceuticals.

Spreading Cash Around Like a Farmer Spreads Manure
Last year, the Pharmaceuticals/Health Products industry spent $267 million on lobbying activities and employed 1,733 lobbyists to deal with 446 clients.

In the 2008 election cycle, folks at Big Pharma gave $29.7 million in political contributions—$14.9 million to Democrats and $14.6 million to Republicans.

Thanks to years of bribing Congress, Big Pharma was permitted to write into the Prescription Drug Plan (Part D) that Medicare could not negotiate lower prices with drug makers. Only the Veteran’s Administration has the right to barter.

So I pay in excess of $1,000 a year for my two prescription pills a day.

That’s where all Big Pharma’s money comes from—the result of rapacious congressmen who, in their frenzy to be reelected, do not give a damn for me or tens of millions like me.

In short, this industry has so much money, it corrupts everything in its path.

How Big Pharma Contaminated TV Network News
Network evening news has devolved into the pharmaceutical industry’s private on-air infirmary. The overwhelming percentage of commercials feature a parade of pusillanimous whining boomers and seniors who can’t pee, poop, get it up, sleep or deal with myriad aches, pains, itchies and other icky bodily symptoms.

In addition, Big Pharma is responsible for incubating the most rare of all diseases—one that afflicts only three people in the world.

This disease is Cronkitis—the pathological compulsion to emulate Walter Cronkite.

Cronkitis turns normally upbeat, intelligent, sometimes droll and occasionally funny network anchors into a trio of ponderous pontificators, whose mission is to project gravitas and pander to advertisers by introducing at least one mawkish health feature a night as editorial content that will give cred to what is being hawked—medicines with more side effects than unpasteurized snake oil.

Takeaways to Consider

The 8 Advantages of Direct Mail Over TV
1. Lists of people with specific illnesses are available, so your marketing money is being spent efficiently only on qualified prospects.

2. Unlike a TV commercial that can be instantly silenced or banished by a remote control, a direct mail package does not go away with a simple click.

3. Direct mail is not like a commercial break where the viewer walks out on you and goes to the john. In fact, your offer might be taken into the john for uninterrupted contemplation.

4. “Of all practical advertising media, only direct mail offers a sufficiently large canvas for telling a complex story.” —Bill Jayme

5.  A direct mail message is not limited by time (as in TV) or space (as in  off-the-page advertising). Plenty of room exists for features, benefits, a guarantee, testimonials from happy users, endorsements by physicians and perhaps a hot potato or two (e.g., a discount certificate with perceived value or the promise of a nifty premium).

6. It is possible to ask for an order and make it easy to order.

7. When you get a response, it can be traced back to the offer and original list, making a precise accounting of ROI possible.

8. The last half of the direct mail effort will not be devoted to a litany of harrowing disclaimers that range from constipation, headaches and nausea on up to amputation, blindness and death.
 

Companies Mentioned:

9

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Bob Condra - Posted on July 26, 2010
Denny,
A provocative post, as usual. A good book that covers the myriad ways big pharma buys doctors and consumers is "Our Daily Meds" by Melody Peterson. Yes, taking a pill is better than surgery, but the sad thing is, big pharma is far more interested in treating the diseases that will produce lifetime customers of their pills, rather than the diseases that may require drug therapy for only a relatively short time span.
R. Turney - Posted on July 26, 2010
I find the pharma ads rather head scratching. Often half of the commercial states the potential side effects, including death, for some meds. How can all this disclaimer copy make for effective TV ads?

Perhaps their ad agency includes in the rationale for TV, that it will enhance the image of the company to the benefits of other chemical cocktails that they market.
arthur einstein - Posted on July 22, 2010
Denny,
Love this post.
You are, as some of my friends down South would say, 'a bird in this world'.

Keep everlastingly at it.
Jon P - Posted on July 21, 2010
Big Pharma works very nicely, hand-in-hand with other industries: For example, the fast food industry generates obesity, diabetes and any number of other ailments with their over-sized portions of processed foods. Then big Pharma comes to the rescue with drugs to cure them.

Rich mentioned how Celiac disease can be controlled by diet. Here's a newsflash: More than 90% of what big Pharma peddles could be eliminated by eating a healthy diet throughout our lives. Most of the other 10% could be made irrelevant through the elimination of environmental pollution caused by fossil fuels and their derivatives.

The pharmaceutical industry is but a symptom of a much bigger disease.
Cherry - Posted on July 21, 2010
Denny:

This was hilarious! Please keep it up (no pun intended).....:-)
Marty Rego - Posted on July 20, 2010
True, Big Pharma pollutes the airwaves with $ billions of advertising, but that's because the ban on Pharma TV advertising was lifted several years ago. It should be reinstated; Pharma should market only to doctors and nurses, not potential patients. Having said that, Big Pharma is primarily responsible for the continuing revolution in health care improvement throughout the world. Say what you will, but taking a pill - no matter how expensive - is a lot cheaper than the alternatives (getting sick, surgery, or death). Big Pharma has undoubtedly improved the quality of life for millions of people throughout the world. Big Pharma routinely spends $ hundreds of billions on research, yet only a small percentage of their drugs make it to market. They deserve a good return on their investment. Otherwise, who will risk their capital to do the research?
Paul Kiewiet - Posted on July 20, 2010
Drug company messages of "Have a Problem, Take a Pill" under lie the television commercials. But to your point, Denny - pharmaceuticals have a very defined target audience and there is no reason why cost-effective targeted marketing shouldn't be used. Oh, well maybe one reason- the hypochondriac effect.
Rich Sowa - Posted on July 20, 2010
Denny, You have outdone yourself this time. I love the unpasteurized snake oil, cronkitis, and pusillanimous whining boomers of this Big Pharma article. This is some of your best work. I like to see you "whack" Big Pharma again on the topic of what they don't do to help people's health. One percent of the American public are reported to have Celiac disease-that's 3 million-yet big pharma will not develop a drug to help them. Why? Because Celiac disease, a disease of the small intestine, which completely changes your life not for the better, can be minimally controlled by diet. Big Pharma can't make a profit and won't spend any money on research so they don't care and neither do most medical professionals. There is no money in a disease that can be controlled, but not cured, by a change in diet so why bother. I know, I have Celiac disease. Keep up the good work and stay on their asses.
Dev. Kinney - Posted on July 20, 2010
Denny,
Big pharma, big business and big government depend on overspending in mass media to offset the effect of cheap local and Internet advertising. Population control depends on top of mind domination. Big education and big media research helps to quantify all this. Thus, while average wealth has depreciated at least 30% in the last two years, big business, financial, education and healthcare power on with fee increases--despite increasing tax losses to government. and heavy shifts in retail spending. This economy is at war with itself.
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Bob Condra - Posted on July 26, 2010
Denny,
A provocative post, as usual. A good book that covers the myriad ways big pharma buys doctors and consumers is "Our Daily Meds" by Melody Peterson. Yes, taking a pill is better than surgery, but the sad thing is, big pharma is far more interested in treating the diseases that will produce lifetime customers of their pills, rather than the diseases that may require drug therapy for only a relatively short time span.
R. Turney - Posted on July 26, 2010
I find the pharma ads rather head scratching. Often half of the commercial states the potential side effects, including death, for some meds. How can all this disclaimer copy make for effective TV ads?

Perhaps their ad agency includes in the rationale for TV, that it will enhance the image of the company to the benefits of other chemical cocktails that they market.
arthur einstein - Posted on July 22, 2010
Denny,
Love this post.
You are, as some of my friends down South would say, 'a bird in this world'.

Keep everlastingly at it.
Jon P - Posted on July 21, 2010
Big Pharma works very nicely, hand-in-hand with other industries: For example, the fast food industry generates obesity, diabetes and any number of other ailments with their over-sized portions of processed foods. Then big Pharma comes to the rescue with drugs to cure them.

Rich mentioned how Celiac disease can be controlled by diet. Here's a newsflash: More than 90% of what big Pharma peddles could be eliminated by eating a healthy diet throughout our lives. Most of the other 10% could be made irrelevant through the elimination of environmental pollution caused by fossil fuels and their derivatives.

The pharmaceutical industry is but a symptom of a much bigger disease.
Cherry - Posted on July 21, 2010
Denny:

This was hilarious! Please keep it up (no pun intended).....:-)
Marty Rego - Posted on July 20, 2010
True, Big Pharma pollutes the airwaves with $ billions of advertising, but that's because the ban on Pharma TV advertising was lifted several years ago. It should be reinstated; Pharma should market only to doctors and nurses, not potential patients. Having said that, Big Pharma is primarily responsible for the continuing revolution in health care improvement throughout the world. Say what you will, but taking a pill - no matter how expensive - is a lot cheaper than the alternatives (getting sick, surgery, or death). Big Pharma has undoubtedly improved the quality of life for millions of people throughout the world. Big Pharma routinely spends $ hundreds of billions on research, yet only a small percentage of their drugs make it to market. They deserve a good return on their investment. Otherwise, who will risk their capital to do the research?
Paul Kiewiet - Posted on July 20, 2010
Drug company messages of "Have a Problem, Take a Pill" under lie the television commercials. But to your point, Denny - pharmaceuticals have a very defined target audience and there is no reason why cost-effective targeted marketing shouldn't be used. Oh, well maybe one reason- the hypochondriac effect.
Rich Sowa - Posted on July 20, 2010
Denny, You have outdone yourself this time. I love the unpasteurized snake oil, cronkitis, and pusillanimous whining boomers of this Big Pharma article. This is some of your best work. I like to see you "whack" Big Pharma again on the topic of what they don't do to help people's health. One percent of the American public are reported to have Celiac disease-that's 3 million-yet big pharma will not develop a drug to help them. Why? Because Celiac disease, a disease of the small intestine, which completely changes your life not for the better, can be minimally controlled by diet. Big Pharma can't make a profit and won't spend any money on research so they don't care and neither do most medical professionals. There is no money in a disease that can be controlled, but not cured, by a change in diet so why bother. I know, I have Celiac disease. Keep up the good work and stay on their asses.
Dev. Kinney - Posted on July 20, 2010
Denny,
Big pharma, big business and big government depend on overspending in mass media to offset the effect of cheap local and Internet advertising. Population control depends on top of mind domination. Big education and big media research helps to quantify all this. Thus, while average wealth has depreciated at least 30% in the last two years, big business, financial, education and healthcare power on with fee increases--despite increasing tax losses to government. and heavy shifts in retail spending. This economy is at war with itself.