Target Marketing

You will be automatically redirected to targetmarketingmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

The Babe Went Out With the Bath Water

America’s Most Influential and Successful Book Publisher was Axed, and a Few Days Later, Her Company Ceased to Exist.

February 2007 By Denny Hatch
9
Get the Flash Player to see this rotator.
 

In the News

Even Bitches Have Feelings
Judith Regan is a walking cartoon, an equal-opportunity bigot—and hardly the only villain in the sordid O.J. publishing scandal.
Even after everything happened with the TV show and the book—after tabloid headlines excoriating her for consorting with the most notorious murderer of the past quarter-century; after Rupert Murdoch and her immediate superior at HarperCollins, Jane Friedman, let her twist in the wind; after even she herself had realized that it was best not to go forward with the book—she wasn’t going to abandon her diet. She went back to Los Angeles, to her life as a “hotel slut,” as she liked to call herself, in a twenties hotel on Sunset Boulevard, and tried to focus on what was important: moving on.
Vanessa Grigoriadis, New York Magazine, Feb. 5, 2007

“Twenty-five years ago, at Vassar, where we met, she was a pretty, plumpish hippie girl, with a soft-focus interest in music, painting, creative writing,” recalled Michael Wolff in a 1999 story for New York Magazine. “Her focus was sharpened by the fact that her family, from Bay Shore, wasn’t rich, and she resented those whose families were.”

Living in Boston in the late 1970s, Regan took a job as a secretary at Harvard and in 1978, went to work for the supermarket tabloid, National Enquirer. During this period, she connected with a psychiatrist with whom she had a son in 1981 and who was subsequently jailed for drug dealing.

Regan moved to New York, and after a brief stint as a producer for “Entertainment Tonight” and “Geraldo,” she went to work for the book publisher, Simon & Schuster in 1981 and flourished. “It turned out that she wasn’t just good at publishing books,” Michael Wolff wrote, “she was better than everybody else. Her resentments, her tabloid training, her victimhood, her attack mode, coalesced into some new model of popular taste. But she fought pitched battles at Simon & Schuster. Ranted. Raved. Attacked.”

And she prevailed, bringing in a string of big-money, best-sellers by celebrities including “Little Girl Lost” by Drew Barrymore and Kathy Lee Gifford’s “I Can’t Believe I said that.”

In 1991, Regan married a money manager with whom she had a daughter. They separated the following year and went through six lawyers and three separate trials during a vicious six-year legal battle. Finally, after more than a million dollars in lawyer fees, a divorce was granted and her instinctual distrust of men and sense of victimhood was exacerbated. In this week’s New York Magazine, Vanessa Grigoriadis, writes:

In her office the day before she was fired, she had a meeting with Anna David, the author of the book Party Girl—You’re so gorgeous you should be on the cover of your book!—and chatted in the corridors with some of her staff: One of the moms told her about her ex-husband, who seemed to be ignoring their kids at Christmastime and reneging on special presents. “Of course he doesn’t have to get them presents,” she fumed. “He’s a man—the only thing they’re good for is semen. They’re inseminators! That’s all they are!”

A stray male walked down the hallway.

“Not you,” she called after him, dissolving in laughter. “Every man except you!”


The Murdoch Connection
In 1994, Rupert Murdoch offered Regan her own imprint, with virtual publishing autonomy under the HarperCollins umbrella, and she accepted. Three years later, former Random House book publicist Jane Friedman was hired by Murdoch as the CEO of HarperCollins, becoming Regan’s boss and signing off on her budget.

Regan’s Lone Ranger, let-it-all-hang-out persona was 180 degrees apart from Friedman’s buttoned-up, corporate style. They were cordial to one another, but in the words of a News Corporation insider, “They were blinded by their hatred of one another.”

Regan had contempt for traditional book publishers, whom she considered snobs. “I don’t have anything to do with the New York publishing world,” she told a reporter after her firing. “I don’t have time. I came into this business as an outsider. I did very well in it, there’s a lot of envy—what can I tell you?”

What Regan had was an intuitive insight into the American psyche and culture—a real sense of what made people tick and what they wanted to read. She came up with book ideas and often sought out writers that were not established so that she would not have to pay large advances. “Gut feeling is what I go on,” she told Dyan Machan of Forbes. “I could tell my husband cheated on me by the way he walked in the front door.”

In her dozen years with Murdoch, Regan published a string of hugely successful, often salacious best sellers. Among the titles: porn actress Jenna Jameson’s “How to Make Love like a Porn Star” and “She comes First: The Thinking Man’s Guide to Pleasuring a Woman.” Other titles include Jose Conseco’s “Juiced: Wild Times, Rampant ‘Roids, Smash Hits, and How Baseball Got Big,” New Jersey gay Governor Jim McGreevey’s “The Confession” and “The Other Man: John F. Kennedy, Carolyn Bessette and Me” by Michael Bergen.

“It was Regan who first realized that talk-radio audiences and others who seemed entirely outside the reach of literary culture would, in fact, buy books,” wrote Judith Newman in the January 2005 edition of Vanity Fair, “and signed up Rush Limbaugh, Howard Stern, and the guys from the World Wrestling Federation, all of whom became best-selling phenomenons.”

Her nine World Wrestling Federation titles sold a reported 3.5 million copies, which brought in $40 million in retail sales.

ReganBooks also published such well-known national figures as Ralph Nader, Arianna Huffington, Alan Colmes, Sean Hannity, Midge Decter, Susan Estrich, General Tommy Franks and Neil Cavuto. In addition, ReganBooks had a well-balanced list—books on cooking, decorating, health, self-help, politics, general non-fiction and fiction.

What made Regan unique—utterly different from every other publisher—was that her books automatically generated buzz. When a Jiffy bag with the ReganBooks logo on the label landed in a newspaper’s book review department or on the desk of a retail or wholesale book buyer, the effect was electric. It went to the head of the queue. It got opened. “What is that wild woman bringing out now?” they would say to themselves.

No other book publisher had a name that would create such immediate titillation—not Random House, not Simon & Schuster, not HarperCollins, not Doubleday. These behemoths are in the business of throwing hundreds of literary eggs against the wall and hoping a few of them stick.

The Yin of Judith Regan

yin
noun
Definition:
feminine principle: the principle of darkness, negativity, and femininity in Chinese philosophy that is the counterpart of yang. The dual, opposite, and complementary principles of yin and yang are thought to exist in varying proportions in all things.
—MSN Encarta Dictionary

Judith Regan was a polarizing figure. In her 2005 Vanity Fair article, “The Devil and Miss Regan,” Judith Newman quoted an editor as saying that if you worked for Regan, “she would give you all sorts of responsibility that would take years to get at a normal company. Of course, you would probably fail, because you didn’t know what you were doing, but at least she gave you the chance.”

Along with generating best-sellers, vast profits for HarperCollins and yummy royalties for her authors, Judith Regan presided over what most observers suggest was a horror show—a simply dreadful work environment.

For example, one former editor told Steve Kettman that Regan went through 80 employees in 2005. If true, that is a 200 percent turnover. In the words of Vanity Fair’s Judith Newman:

Many staffers—and other colleagues—had epithets according to their sexual orientation or ethnicity: “I was the lesbian c**t,” says one former competitor. “Then there was the black c**t.” When she got mad, people were called “f*****g retards” and “f******g idiots;” if she got really mad, she’d accuse people of being either “fags” or “on drugs” or, preferably, both.

Over the Top with O.J. Simpson
In 2005, Regan moved her offices to Los Angeles, claiming she preferred the quality of life and creative atmosphere. On May 6, 2006, Judith Regan and Jane Friedman jointly signed a contract with Lorraine Brooke Associates, Inc. for an O.J. Simpson memoir in a deal that included a $1.1 million advance for a book—eventually titled “If I Did It”—and a television interview. All income from the project was slated to go to Simpson’s children, which would keep it out of reach of the Goldman family to whom Simpson owed $33 million for the murder of their son, the result of a civil judgment against him:

UNTITLED CONFIDENTIAL PROJECT by O.J. Simpson, being a first person narrative in the voice of O.J. Simpson, which offers a hypothetical account of how Mr. Simpson could theoretically have accomplished the murder of his wife and Ronald Goldman had he, in fact, committed the crime, containing details concerning the events leading up to the crime, what Mr. Simpson’s thoughts, feelings and motives would have been, and characters and situations involved that would only be known to Mr. Simpson, and debunking the various flawed theories proposed by L.A. prosecutors and others about the crime, …

The Goldman family immediately filed suit, claiming that Lorraine Brooke Associates was a dummy corporation formed to hide the transaction and that Lorraine and Brooke were the middle names of Simpson’s two children.

Last week a federal judge dismissed the suit, saying that he had no jurisdiction.

The deal provoked a tsunami of outrage in the media. The Washington Post’s Howard Kurtz called it the “most appalling, shameless, exploitative thing I have heard of in the history of television, maybe the history of recorded civilization.”

Barbara Walters was approached to do the television interview with Simpson but turned it down. Regan, who had hosted a late-night television show and currently had a program on Sirius satellite radio, wound up interrogating the acquitted killer.

The interview was DOA. Everything about O.J. Simpson was poisonous, just like Charles Manson, Sirhan Sirhan and Michael Jackson. Advertisers would not touch it. Fox News host Bill O’Reilly went ballistic. “I’m not going to watch the Simpson show or even look at the book,” he said. “If any company sponsors the TV program, I will not buy anything that company sells—ever.”

Fox News star Geraldo Rivera joined the insurrection saying, “I will bash this project every minute I have the opportunity to bash this project.”

On November 17, Regan delivered a truly weird 2,200-word apologia on her Sirius radio program, a classic of inner-directed nuttiness. From the transcript:

I had never met him and never spoken with him until the day I interviewed him. And I was ready. Fifty-three years prepared me for this conversation.

The men who lied and cheated and beat me—they were all there in the room. And the people who denied it, they were there too. And though it might sound a little strange, Nicole and Ron were in my heart. And for them I wanted him to confess his sins, to do penance and to amend his life. Amen.


Four days later, Murdoch ordered the project quashed. “I and senior management agree with the American public that this was an ill-considered project,” Murdoch said. “We are sorry for any pain this has caused the families of Ron Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson.”

Regan went on the attack. In a phone conversation with corporate attorney Mark Jackson, she reportedly claimed that Jackson, Jane Friedman, HarperCollins executive editor David Hirshey and literary agent Esther Newberg “constitute a Jewish cabal against her.”

“‘Of all people, the Jews should know about ganging up, finding common enemies and telling the big lie,” she said, according to Attorney Jackson’s notes.

On December 15, Jane Friedman issued the following statement:

Judith Regan’s employment with HarperCollins has been terminated effective immediately. The Regan publishing program and staff will continue as part of the HarperCollins General Books Group.

On January 17, it was announced that HarperCollins was shuttering the company for good with most employees being reassigned to jobs in HarperCollins. Existing titles would be available through retailers and wholesalers. Forthcoming books would be published under the aegis of HarperCollins.

The Epitaph
Stephen Kettman’s year-end piece in the San Francisco Chronicle—following Regan’s being axed but prior to the killing of her company—perhaps best sums up Judith Regan:

“If she folded up her tent now and said, ‘Forget it, I’ve had enough,’ and didn’t work anywhere else, I think publishing learned from her that you have to appeal to the masses,” said one former Regan Books editor. “Enough of being too high-brow. She was the one who said yes to wrestling when everybody was turning their noses up at it. Bang, No. 1. She had an ear to the ground and it worked for a long time.

“There is so much fear in publishing,” the former editor continued. “Everybody is so afraid to make a mistake. Everybody is so afraid to do something that’s not derivative. She looked around and said, ‘What kind of book needs to be made?’ Other people look around and say, ‘What are other people doing and how can I do a book like that?’ So many people were looking to her to see what she was doing that was working, and to adapt that. She was a maverick and she had no problem stepping out and doing something that nobody else would even have thought of. She was completely fearless.”

Takeaway Points to Consider:

* Jane Friedman has royally screwed the authors of all Judith Regan’s forthcoming books by shutting down ReganBooks. Instead of the cache and sex appeal of coming out under Judith Regan’s imprint, they are being shoveled into the massive maw of HarperCollins, which, together with its various subsidiaries worldwide, publishes 5,000 titles a year. Without the Regan mojo, these books and authors are likely to disappear without a trace.

* In researching this story, I wanted to find a list of books published by Judith Regan. The imprint has been stripped clean from the HarperCollins United States Web site.

* Towson University Political Science Professor Martha Joynt Kumar said, “If it hasn’t happened on television, it hasn’t happened.” Similarly, if a person or company does not exist on the Internet, it does not exist.

* Apparently, HarperCollins New York did not communicate this to HarperCollins Australia, which has available on its Web site a complete list of ReganBooks.

* No one has the right to abuse co-workers and get away with it.

* If an entrepreneur—no matter how brilliant—is known to be a loose cannon, it is probably a bad idea for that person to go to work for a large, publicly-held corporation in any capacity other than a freelance consultant.

* With an unpublished novel sitting in my computer and no agent and no contacts in the book-publishing world, I can only say this. If I had the choice of being published by Random House, Simon & Schuster, Doubleday, HarperCollins or the Judith Regan Redux Publishing Company operating from a garret in SoHo or a Watts slum, I would go with Regan in a heartbeat.

Web Sites Related to Today's Edition:

ReganBooks Australia—A List of Titles
http://tinyurl.com/2mbc2v

Judith Regan’s Apologia
http://tinyurl.com/y5o73w

Friedman-Regan Contract for O.J. Simpson’s Book (PDF)
http://tinyurl.com/2p5c8s

Update on Hillary Clinton’s Run for the Presidency
The Jan. 30, 2007 edition of this e-zine was titled, “Hillary Clinton as a Sock Puppet.” This past week an astonishing YouTube clip surfaced showing Senator Hillary Clinton addressing the Democratic National Committee Winter Meeting in Washington last week in which she proclaims:

The other day, the oil companies reported the highest profits in the history of the world. I want to take those profits and I want to put them into a strategic energy fund that will begin to fund alternative smart energy … alternative and technologies that will begin to actually move us toward the direction of independence.

This statement and this video clip will do to Senator Clinton’s candidacy what “I voted for it before I voted against it” did to John Kerry’s in 2004.

It will so frighten every American that owns a share of stock, that the Democrats would be fools to nominate her.

Hillary Clinton will not be elected president.

You heard it here first, folks.

Web Site Related to This Story

Hillary Clinton on the Subject of Oil Profits
http://tinyurl.com/2vtxnr
 
9

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Denny Hatch - Posted on February 08, 2007
To: Jim McQuillan

I am delighted that somebody disagreed with me!

I posted your comment immediately.

Hillary Clinton is giving new meaning to the concept of eminent domain. Suddenly your portfolio, your bank account, your investments are fair game if the gov?t thinks you are too successful.

On his Sunday night radio show, Matt Drugde suggested that the royalties from Hillary?s book be confiscated and given to charity.

Cheers.
Jim McQuillan - Posted on February 08, 2007
Re: Hillary. Couldn?t be further away from you and some of your readers on this one Denny. It looks like the US taxpayers are going to spend a $trillion in Iraq - not to mention the sacrifices of individuals in the US military AND the millions of Iraqi people with no homes, jobs, economy, limbs, life or family. Am I to believe then that from this shared investment and sacrifice it is okay for the oil companies to make such grossly inflated profits? While not a fan of government interference in business, for corporations to so gluttonously feast upon the misfortunes and sacrifices of others -- while gouging the buying public to boot -- all so that a few portfolios can be padded seems more like taking from the have-nots and giving to the haves than vice-versa. As these ill-gotten extra profits are the direct result of a war sanctioned by God (as the President has stated), I guess to ask ?What would Jesus do?? in this case we?d really have to ask his broker. This is certainly NOT a case of government taking money away from fair-made profits. And if it is, then maybe we should start re-spelling capitalism as C-O-L-O-N-I-A-L-I-S-M. Let?s hope these modern day robber barons don?t make so much that they can hold us hostage with the next energy source.
Christin Mowery - Posted on February 07, 2007
I think that Regan is brilliant in her business instincts, but should not have abused her employees the way she did. We all know how hard it is to find qualified, loyal employees, so what is the point of pushing them away with personal attacks? I understand that in this world it's hard enough to get respect as a woman, and if you play hard, most will consider you a b*tch, but you don't REALLY have to be one. Stand up for yourself, don't take anything from anyone, but you have to be respectable to be respected. Otherwise, they fear you, or the loss of their job, but never respect you. It's a fine line, easily crossed.

Hillary is satan. Enough said.
Erik Holden - Posted on February 07, 2007
I heard the other day that Hilary Clinton is also going after HarperCollins' profits to set up a fund to help all the victims of Judith Regan's emotional abuse. Seriously though, the huge majority of Americans that don't understand the ramifications of what Hilary said will think she is a saint for going after the bloated coffers of the big oil. Smart move on her part.
Jim - Posted on February 07, 2007
There?s no excuse for someone being a jerk in the workplace. None. Sure seems like Judith wasn?t just hard-driving?she was a cold, callous jerk. These types of people have such a toxic effect on the workplace, even if the person in question is an outstanding performer it?s almost never worth the tradeoffs. Some people excuse this sort of behavior on the grounds that ?it?s just what brilliant, successful entrepreneurs do?. I don?t buy it. The same could be said about, say, professional football coaches. But as both Tony Dungy and Lovie Smith showed on Sunday, you don?t have to be Bill Parcells to lead a team to great success.

There?s an interesting article in Inc. this month about this very topic:

http://www.inc.com/magazine/20070201/managing-culture.html

As for whether I?d want her publishing my book, I?m just not sure. Perhaps the odds are so stacked against someone getting published successfully that it makes some sort of sense to make a ?deal with the devil?. But if you lie with dogs, don?t be surprised when you wake up with fleas.

As for Hillary, all I can say is, "Wow!"...
Bernie Malonson - Posted on February 06, 2007
Fascinating read, and lots of insights to go around. All I could think of as I read was the movie "The Devil Wears Prada" while reading. It is interesting you mentioned the loathing between Regan and Friedman, however as long as she was hitting homeruns, not a problem. However once the potential embarrassment comes up, she's toast. It will be interesting to see who snaps her up next.
David Garfinkel - Posted on February 06, 2007
Brilliant analysis, Denny. Let's start with, I'm Jewish. I wouldn't want to work for her. I wouldn't want her as a subordinate. But I sure as hell would like her to shape, direct, mold, promote and publish my next book. A client of mine recommended another outrageous literary phenomenon to me last week, Gene Simmons' "Sex Money and Kiss." Gene Simmons is a less vitriolic version of Judith Regan. I guess we in direct marketing sort of know from experience (or calluses, or tire tracks on our backs) that the conventional wisdom and the go-along get-along way of doing things does not for great things make. So here's a Utopian thought: What if there were a way to do what she did without all the emotional and workplace carnage?
Donna Lendvay - Posted on February 06, 2007
When a man has a tirade in an office - everyone looks the other way. Let a woman have a tirade and she's a bitch - even if she's bringing in $100 mil. When are people going to grow up - stop acting like babies with their feelings hurt all the time and just get their jobs done? I do think she was off-base on the OJ thing - but she had the right to publish it - we have the right to ignore it! And - where in the heck is Hilary coming from (I heard the speech on the radio.) wanting to "take away" profits? Aren't we all more than a little scared?? Can't we spell S-O-C-I-A-L-I-S-M?? In this day and age of entitlement, welfare, illegal immigration, and the dumbing down of America through our universities and public schools, she is a shoe in don't cha think!!
Brent D. Gardner - Posted on February 06, 2007
I'm a maverick. We're not often popular, but my enemies have told me to my face they respect me. They just don't do it when others are around. Regan lacked a filter in her brain. She said what many want to say, including the abuse of staff. It's not easy to find good help these days. Fortunately, I have a filter. Most of the time, it works, too.

I heard the Clinton clip, and it sent shivers down my spine. When O'Reilly was bashing Exxon, I went out and added shares to my account. I hope they keep making mega bank. I didn't buy to lose.

What Clinton said is akin to Marx or Lenin, wanting to take from the haves and give to the have-nots, in an effort to buy votes. The scary thing is that it's worked in the past. She's the epitome of Jefferson's prediction that the majority would vote themselves largesse of the public treasury.
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Denny Hatch - Posted on February 08, 2007
To: Jim McQuillan

I am delighted that somebody disagreed with me!

I posted your comment immediately.

Hillary Clinton is giving new meaning to the concept of eminent domain. Suddenly your portfolio, your bank account, your investments are fair game if the gov?t thinks you are too successful.

On his Sunday night radio show, Matt Drugde suggested that the royalties from Hillary?s book be confiscated and given to charity.

Cheers.
Jim McQuillan - Posted on February 08, 2007
Re: Hillary. Couldn?t be further away from you and some of your readers on this one Denny. It looks like the US taxpayers are going to spend a $trillion in Iraq - not to mention the sacrifices of individuals in the US military AND the millions of Iraqi people with no homes, jobs, economy, limbs, life or family. Am I to believe then that from this shared investment and sacrifice it is okay for the oil companies to make such grossly inflated profits? While not a fan of government interference in business, for corporations to so gluttonously feast upon the misfortunes and sacrifices of others -- while gouging the buying public to boot -- all so that a few portfolios can be padded seems more like taking from the have-nots and giving to the haves than vice-versa. As these ill-gotten extra profits are the direct result of a war sanctioned by God (as the President has stated), I guess to ask ?What would Jesus do?? in this case we?d really have to ask his broker. This is certainly NOT a case of government taking money away from fair-made profits. And if it is, then maybe we should start re-spelling capitalism as C-O-L-O-N-I-A-L-I-S-M. Let?s hope these modern day robber barons don?t make so much that they can hold us hostage with the next energy source.
Christin Mowery - Posted on February 07, 2007
I think that Regan is brilliant in her business instincts, but should not have abused her employees the way she did. We all know how hard it is to find qualified, loyal employees, so what is the point of pushing them away with personal attacks? I understand that in this world it's hard enough to get respect as a woman, and if you play hard, most will consider you a b*tch, but you don't REALLY have to be one. Stand up for yourself, don't take anything from anyone, but you have to be respectable to be respected. Otherwise, they fear you, or the loss of their job, but never respect you. It's a fine line, easily crossed.

Hillary is satan. Enough said.
Erik Holden - Posted on February 07, 2007
I heard the other day that Hilary Clinton is also going after HarperCollins' profits to set up a fund to help all the victims of Judith Regan's emotional abuse. Seriously though, the huge majority of Americans that don't understand the ramifications of what Hilary said will think she is a saint for going after the bloated coffers of the big oil. Smart move on her part.
Jim - Posted on February 07, 2007
There?s no excuse for someone being a jerk in the workplace. None. Sure seems like Judith wasn?t just hard-driving?she was a cold, callous jerk. These types of people have such a toxic effect on the workplace, even if the person in question is an outstanding performer it?s almost never worth the tradeoffs. Some people excuse this sort of behavior on the grounds that ?it?s just what brilliant, successful entrepreneurs do?. I don?t buy it. The same could be said about, say, professional football coaches. But as both Tony Dungy and Lovie Smith showed on Sunday, you don?t have to be Bill Parcells to lead a team to great success.

There?s an interesting article in Inc. this month about this very topic:

http://www.inc.com/magazine/20070201/managing-culture.html

As for whether I?d want her publishing my book, I?m just not sure. Perhaps the odds are so stacked against someone getting published successfully that it makes some sort of sense to make a ?deal with the devil?. But if you lie with dogs, don?t be surprised when you wake up with fleas.

As for Hillary, all I can say is, "Wow!"...
Bernie Malonson - Posted on February 06, 2007
Fascinating read, and lots of insights to go around. All I could think of as I read was the movie "The Devil Wears Prada" while reading. It is interesting you mentioned the loathing between Regan and Friedman, however as long as she was hitting homeruns, not a problem. However once the potential embarrassment comes up, she's toast. It will be interesting to see who snaps her up next.
David Garfinkel - Posted on February 06, 2007
Brilliant analysis, Denny. Let's start with, I'm Jewish. I wouldn't want to work for her. I wouldn't want her as a subordinate. But I sure as hell would like her to shape, direct, mold, promote and publish my next book. A client of mine recommended another outrageous literary phenomenon to me last week, Gene Simmons' "Sex Money and Kiss." Gene Simmons is a less vitriolic version of Judith Regan. I guess we in direct marketing sort of know from experience (or calluses, or tire tracks on our backs) that the conventional wisdom and the go-along get-along way of doing things does not for great things make. So here's a Utopian thought: What if there were a way to do what she did without all the emotional and workplace carnage?
Donna Lendvay - Posted on February 06, 2007
When a man has a tirade in an office - everyone looks the other way. Let a woman have a tirade and she's a bitch - even if she's bringing in $100 mil. When are people going to grow up - stop acting like babies with their feelings hurt all the time and just get their jobs done? I do think she was off-base on the OJ thing - but she had the right to publish it - we have the right to ignore it! And - where in the heck is Hilary coming from (I heard the speech on the radio.) wanting to "take away" profits? Aren't we all more than a little scared?? Can't we spell S-O-C-I-A-L-I-S-M?? In this day and age of entitlement, welfare, illegal immigration, and the dumbing down of America through our universities and public schools, she is a shoe in don't cha think!!
Brent D. Gardner - Posted on February 06, 2007
I'm a maverick. We're not often popular, but my enemies have told me to my face they respect me. They just don't do it when others are around. Regan lacked a filter in her brain. She said what many want to say, including the abuse of staff. It's not easy to find good help these days. Fortunately, I have a filter. Most of the time, it works, too.

I heard the Clinton clip, and it sent shivers down my spine. When O'Reilly was bashing Exxon, I went out and added shares to my account. I hope they keep making mega bank. I didn't buy to lose.

What Clinton said is akin to Marx or Lenin, wanting to take from the haves and give to the have-nots, in an effort to buy votes. The scary thing is that it's worked in the past. She's the epitome of Jefferson's prediction that the majority would vote themselves largesse of the public treasury.