Target Marketing

You will be automatically redirected to targetmarketingmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

Advertising Goes High-Tech

It's about data and arithmetic. And it's about time!

Vol. 5, Issue No. 22 | November 10, 2009 By Denny Hatch
7
Get the Flash Player to see this rotator.
 

IN THE NEWS

Saks Challenges Web Discounters
Beleaguered high-end retailer Saks Inc. is testing online "private event" sales of discounted designer goods, in a bid to compete with "flash" Web discounters that are gaining popularity in the U.S.
Saks on Tuesday launched a 36-hour sale open only to those who received emails from Saks directing them to the site. The limited time sale will be followed by another test in November, it said Wednesday.

—Vanessa O’Connell, The Wall Street Journal, Oct. 29, 2009


  • The sides of private automobiles and garbage trucks driving around town.
  • Grocery store conveyor belts at the checkout register.
  • McDonald’s-sponsored school report cards.
  • Jet plane bodies.
  • Over urinals in men’s rooms.
  • Golf carts.
  • Online game sites.
  • High school sports uniforms.
  • Airport baggage carousels.

“Somewhere between 254 and 5,000 is a number that represents just how many commercial messages an average consumer gets each day,” wrote Matthew Creamer on AdAge.com. “Attempts to beat clutter only end up yielding more of it, a bitter irony bound to have dire consequences for a business already struggling with questions of relevance and effectiveness.”

On top of this clutter is “guerrilla marketing” (which former David Ogilvy colleague Drayton Bird calls “gorilla” marketing):

  • Ambush marketing. Mars candy people dressed up staff in M&M character suits along the Olympic marathon route with instructions to jump onto the course as the runners went by and wave madly at the TV cameras.
  • Word-of-mouth (buzz) marketing.
  • Product placements. A $1.9 billion annual business where advertisers paid to have:
    • Durex condoms inserted into podcasts.
    • McDonald’s iced coffee on the desk of FOX affiliate KVVU news anchors in Las Vegas.
    • Continual mentions of Rolaids on a FOX episode of “Bernie Mac.”
    • An unbelievable 7,502 mentions or appearances of products in NBC’s reality show “The Contender” in 2005.
    • In the 1966 revival of Neil Simon’s “Sweet Charity,” a waiter asked the customer if he would have “Gran Centenario, the tequila?”
  • Naming rights.
    • The Nationwide [Insurance] Children’s Hospital broke ground in 2008 for a trauma center to be named for Abercrombie & Fitch, which donated $50 million.
    • Also, a newborn baby's mother, Melissa Heuschkel of Connecticut, was paid $15,500 to name her the little girl “GoldenPalace.com Benedetto.” Known as Goldie, the child has over 16,000 entries on Google.
  • Ad space on bodies. In my files are stories of ads being sold on hands, foreheads, breasts and bottoms (see illustration below).

All this nuttiness is advertising aimed at reaching people, for the most part, in situations where it's impossible to respond. In the case of an occasional response, no mechanism exists to correlate the sale or inquiry back to the cost of the specific ad.

Add to this financial bloodletting the so-called “awareness” advertising—page after page of beauty shots of competing products in Vanity Fair and Vogue that go in one eye and out the other with no way to respond.

Think of the overpowering number of TV commercials that make no offer, but simply hope the viewer will remember the brand on the next trip to the supermarket or driving by a car dealership.

Again, no way exists to track the purchase vis-à-vis the specific advertisement.

General advertising is measured by the number of “impressions.” This is the same idiocy as the acquisition of “eyeballs” on which the entire dot-com boom was founded (and resulted in the dot-com bust).

In the immortal words of Agora’s Bill Bonner, “The only bank that takes eyeballs is the eye bank.”

The bottom line: Consumers are barraged and harangued with trillions of ads by advertisers pissing away billions of dollars without a clue as to whether the ads are effective or the money well spent.

The only true measure of advertising success is response—return on investment and lifetime value.

Happily for advertisers, change is in the wind.

The Vespa Story
In 1954, I spent six weeks in Rome and came away with many images etched in memory. One of them was the vast number of motor scooters—Lambrettas and Vespas—darting through the dense traffic. The driver was usually a guy and very often—perched sidesaddle on the back—was a young lady with legs crossed and trench coat or skirt flying in the wind.

This image was immortalized in William Wyler’s 1953 masterpiece “Roman Holiday” with Audrey Hepburn and Gregory Peck.

The Vespa was born in 1946, the brainchild of aeronautical engineer Corradino D'Ascanio who encased the little putt-putt engine in a metal covering that protected the rider’s clothes from oil and gook. After myriad up-and-down vicissitudes, the company was bought in 2003 by maverick industrialist Roberto Colaninno, who installed Rocco Sabelli as CEO. Sabelli redesigned the manufacturing process and instituted a bold new management style, described by Gabriel Kahn in The Wall Street Journal:

Mr. Sabelli also injected a culture of accountability into a company where — as is often the case in Italy — management had previously kept its distance from workers. On one of his first days on the job, he gave his email address to every employee, demanding that even assembly-line workers let him know personally about any problems or delays. "We knew that execution had to be our focus," says Mr. Sabelli. "No magic recipe, just execution."

With the skyrocketing price of gasoline and the glut of city traffic, Vespa is once again on a roll as a low-cost, attractive (and fun!) alternative to gas-guzzlers. For example, Pennsylvania has 16 Vespa dealerships across the state.

Enter Serial Entrepreneur Darren Herman
So how do you sell Vespas?

In the old days, the agency account executive would tell the creative department to design a bunch of ads, and he'd run the one he liked best.

Darren Herman is a 2000 graduate of Skidmore College with a B.S. degree and an approach to advertising that is emphatically not the usual industry BS.

For starters, he believes in testing—not using time-consuming and wildly expensive old media such as print, direct mail, telemarketing or TV. Instead he tests on the Web, where (1) it’s cheap and (2) results can be read in nearly real time with tweaks and major adjustments made instantly.

At the end of this column there are a dozen down-‘n’-dirty Vespa ads that Herman tested on the Web, often using the digital equivalent of ol'-fashion remainder space. With such a campaign, once a solid control is in place, the offer can be blasted across all media internationally. The only constraint is the speed at which the factory can deliver product.

“It’s putting numbers to an industry that never had numbers before,” Darren Herman told The New York Times.

Uh, not quite true. Direct marketers have always operated on numbers. Now at last a new breed of whiz kids is using the Internet to take advertising into the 21st century.

I urge everybody to read Stephanie Clifford’s New York Times story on Darren Herman. (The link is below.)

And then go and do thou likewise.


Takeaways to Consider

  • “The only bank that takes eyeballs is the eye bank.”
    Bill Bonner
  • Does every employee in your company have the CEO’s e-mail address, and does the CEO welcome ideas from everybody from the mail room on up? If not, why not?
  • The only true measure of advertising success is response and an acceptable ROI. Anything less is throwing money down the sewer.
  • The true value of a customer or donor is the lifetime value.
  • It doesn’t matter whether you like or dislike an ad. All that matters is whether it worked or not.
  • You cannot judge good advertising; it judges you.

Web Sites Related to Today's Edition

"Saks Challenges Web Discounters"
http://url2it.com/bikt

“Flash” Web discounters based on exclusivity
www.Gilt.com
www.HauteLook.com
www.RueLaLa.com

“Bernard Madoff and the Jews of Palm Beach”
http://url2it.com/bilb

“Vespa's Builder Scoots Back To Profitability”
http://url2it.com/bilc

“Put Ad on Web. Count Clicks. Revise.” By Stephanie Clifford
http://tinyurl.com/ncnn3x

Darren Herman on the Web
www.darrenherman.com
http://url2it.com/bild
www.varickmm.com


 
7

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Jeff Ogden - Posted on November 24, 2009
Great article and a great approach.

At night I sometimes turn on the TV and see the mind-numbing array of car and pharma ads. I cannot help but feel the world is ignoring them as I am.

You sum this up perfectly in the comment "The mind-numbing waste of general advertising."
Jeff Ogden, President
Find New Customers
http://www.findnewcustomers.net
Wash Phillips - Posted on November 20, 2009
Denny, I love a turnaround success story. Even if it uses tools well-proven by others (e.g., direct response).

Of the 2 winning test ads shown, neither shows the vehicle or identifies what the brand stands for exactly. Can we learn from that...

a)All the current respondents get what Vespa is (and are likely to be an older demo for whom the brand is known)?

b)These tests were effective for demos as described above and will work less well for a less- experienced segment who need more missionary work?

c)The oil crunch drives buyers of all ages to look into any practical ways to cut driving costs (even if they're unfamiliar with the Vespa name or vehicle)?

d)There's more to click on those ads after all (and that additional info is a serious part of the appeal--not just the heds)? Impossible to judge that from the graphics shown, since hotlinks are not visible.
Darren - Posted on November 11, 2009
Great Article Denny,

Gives me confirmation that the things I'm determined to learn on top of direct marketing. A/B split testing, conversion metric's etc.. are where it's at.

I came across a great you tube video by David Ogilvy praising direct marketers on their scientific approach and how they are the future of effective advertising/ marketing.
Dave Culbertson - Posted on November 11, 2009
Loved this column, Denny. For samples of contrarian email advertising, I recommend subscribing to the emails from Despair.com. Once a year, they do a complete site "black out" sale. Everything on the website is on sale and you can only access the site if you're an email subscriber!
David Garfinkel - Posted on November 10, 2009
Things are changing. Yes, the champions of impressions and share-of-mind are either boasting that they invented something new, or being dragged kicking and screaming into this particular circle of hell (for them) called "Accountability"

In research for a proposal I just completed, I found this quote from David Silverman, PricewaterhouseCoopers, which co-authored a report with the Interactive Advertising Bureau:

"marketers are allocating more of their dollars to digital media for its accountability and because consumers are spending more of their leisure time online."

I don't know about your take on that, Denny, but I read it as: "the world is moving, if even ever so incrementally, to direct marketing."
Gregory Barros - Posted on November 10, 2009
Hi Denny,

Thank you.

Your essay is most timely. All this work is meaningless if it doesn't sell products and increase revenue.

I enjoyed sampling Mr. Herman's test ads and so make the following playfulness my valediction:

"Turns on a dime. Runs on a nickel. Looks like a million."
Dev. Kinney - Posted on November 10, 2009
Denny, your arguments for response advertising are so logical, readers will wonder why very large companies don't bother. And the reason is simple. The main purpose of advertising is domination of consciousness. Selling products is the function of marketing.
Large Advertisers know they have to go where public consciousness exists in mass and compete. Thus we remember such classics as "When it rains it pours," "That's a spicy meatball," "Where's the beef?" etc. Another great article! --Dev.

Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Jeff Ogden - Posted on November 24, 2009
Great article and a great approach.

At night I sometimes turn on the TV and see the mind-numbing array of car and pharma ads. I cannot help but feel the world is ignoring them as I am.

You sum this up perfectly in the comment "The mind-numbing waste of general advertising."
Jeff Ogden, President
Find New Customers
http://www.findnewcustomers.net
Wash Phillips - Posted on November 20, 2009
Denny, I love a turnaround success story. Even if it uses tools well-proven by others (e.g., direct response).

Of the 2 winning test ads shown, neither shows the vehicle or identifies what the brand stands for exactly. Can we learn from that...

a)All the current respondents get what Vespa is (and are likely to be an older demo for whom the brand is known)?

b)These tests were effective for demos as described above and will work less well for a less- experienced segment who need more missionary work?

c)The oil crunch drives buyers of all ages to look into any practical ways to cut driving costs (even if they're unfamiliar with the Vespa name or vehicle)?

d)There's more to click on those ads after all (and that additional info is a serious part of the appeal--not just the heds)? Impossible to judge that from the graphics shown, since hotlinks are not visible.
Darren - Posted on November 11, 2009
Great Article Denny,

Gives me confirmation that the things I'm determined to learn on top of direct marketing. A/B split testing, conversion metric's etc.. are where it's at.

I came across a great you tube video by David Ogilvy praising direct marketers on their scientific approach and how they are the future of effective advertising/ marketing.
Dave Culbertson - Posted on November 11, 2009
Loved this column, Denny. For samples of contrarian email advertising, I recommend subscribing to the emails from Despair.com. Once a year, they do a complete site "black out" sale. Everything on the website is on sale and you can only access the site if you're an email subscriber!
David Garfinkel - Posted on November 10, 2009
Things are changing. Yes, the champions of impressions and share-of-mind are either boasting that they invented something new, or being dragged kicking and screaming into this particular circle of hell (for them) called "Accountability"

In research for a proposal I just completed, I found this quote from David Silverman, PricewaterhouseCoopers, which co-authored a report with the Interactive Advertising Bureau:

"marketers are allocating more of their dollars to digital media for its accountability and because consumers are spending more of their leisure time online."

I don't know about your take on that, Denny, but I read it as: "the world is moving, if even ever so incrementally, to direct marketing."
Gregory Barros - Posted on November 10, 2009
Hi Denny,

Thank you.

Your essay is most timely. All this work is meaningless if it doesn't sell products and increase revenue.

I enjoyed sampling Mr. Herman's test ads and so make the following playfulness my valediction:

"Turns on a dime. Runs on a nickel. Looks like a million."
Dev. Kinney - Posted on November 10, 2009
Denny, your arguments for response advertising are so logical, readers will wonder why very large companies don't bother. And the reason is simple. The main purpose of advertising is domination of consciousness. Selling products is the function of marketing.
Large Advertisers know they have to go where public consciousness exists in mass and compete. Thus we remember such classics as "When it rains it pours," "That's a spicy meatball," "Where's the beef?" etc. Another great article! --Dev.