Target Marketing

You will be automatically redirected to targetmarketingmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

Trashing Brands and Other Stuff

A Look Back: 2005-2007

January 2007 By Denny Hatch
7

In the News

Boston’s Tale of Two Ritzes
Change in Owners Ends 80-Year Era Overnight; A Sibling With Flaws
By the time I arrived at the Ritz-Carlton Boston for one last Ritz Fizz, it wasn’t the Ritz anymore. In a changeover that erased three quarters of a century of tradition—including the famed blue Curacao-and-Champagne cocktail invented in the bar—the oldest Ritz-Carlton in the U.S. was rechristened last week as the Taj Boston by its new owners, Taj Hotels. That makes it part of the sprawling Mumbai, India-based Tata Group empire, which bought the 273-room hotel, but not the rights to its name, from Millennium Partners in November for $170 million.
—Laura Landro, The Wall Street Journal, Jan. 19, 2007; Page W3
The idea that Bostonians would wake up one morning and find out that the Ritz-Carlton Boston was suddenly the Taj Boston is astonishing. Built in 1927, the Ritz-Carlton was to Boston what the Plaza was to New York; the Palmer House was to Chicago; and the Adams Mark was (and is) to San Francisco—a home away from home that offered unmatched elegance, service and ambiance. I’ll take it one step further: perpetual perfection.

The motto of the Ritz-Carlton staff: “We are ladies and gentlemen serving ladies and gentlemen.”

A second Ritz-Carlton exists in Boston. But if you Google “The Ritz-Carlton Boston,” the following is what appears on the screen, under the famous, blue Ritz-Carlton logo—a lion head atop a kingly crown:

We’re sorry, but we are unable to locate the page you have requested.

Please confirm that the URL has been spelled correctly. If so, then the page you requested no
longer exists at our website.


The implication that I’m too stupid to spell “Ritz-Carlton” is an insult. People are directed to other Ritz-Carltons. But THE Ritz-Carlton is dead.

In yesterday’s New York Times, there was a full-page ad that featured a stylized, black panther wearing a diamond necklace and matching earring. The headline: “LUXURY BEYOND YOUR WILDEST DREAMS.”

The subhead: “Introducing the Taj Boston. January 11, 2007.” No mention that the new Taj is the old Ritz. No mention of the Ritz anywhere in the ad.

Is it smart to take a grand brand—with an 80-year record of excellence and a roster of rich and famous customers from all over the world—trash it, and start over?

You have to shake your head in wonderment.

The Power of Brand
Over the years, a series of large, old-line American corporations—with wonderfully evocative names—switched to initials and acronyms. For example:

—International Business Machines became IBM.
—American Machine and Foundry was turned into AMF.
—West Virginia Pulp and Paper is now Westvaco (actually MeadWestvaco).
—National Cash Register went to NCR.

It made sense. These companies got into other areas. Cash registers and business machines are out of another century and these companies have moved on.

For example, in the 1970s, my wife, Peggy, and I bought a little Sunfish sailboat made by AMF. Had the conglomerate kept its original name, I would’ve stopped and thought, “Why is a machine and foundry company making a fiberglass boat?”

Takeaway Points to Consider:

* When you buy a beloved brand and feel the need to change the name, think through whether you want to throw out the baby with the bath water (to coin a phrase). If the acquisition of Marshall Field’s by Macy’s was inevitable, then the Federated chain should show Chicago how proud it was to have the premier department store as part of its family. The new name: Macy’s Marshall Field’s.

* I’ve stayed in a number of hotels in London. Among them: the Radisson Vanderbilt and the Trafalgar Hilton—both venerable hostelries that had been recently acquired by chains. In London, they’re known by one and all (including cab drivers) by their original names. The chain logo is nowhere in sight. Even though the Marriott owns and operates the Ritz-Carlton chain, it has the good sense not to muck up a great brand with Marriott logos everywhere.

* If you summarily make a change that upsets customers, they’ll vote with their feet—and their credit cards.

* “Listen to the murmur of your market. Create feedback loops in your database environment so that you can record what your customers and prospects are saying about your products, your service, your company and your competition. There is no more valuable source of information.”
—Don Jackson

* Before changing a known and respected business name, check out Jeff Wuorio’s, “Change Your Business Name? 7 Issues” at http://tinyurl.com/2rmmqd/ This will help you think through all aspects of the decision.

Web Sites Related to Today's Edition:

Taj Boston
http://tinyurl.com/28dvxq/

Ritz-Carlton Boston
http://ritzcarlton.com/hotels/boston/

“Change Your Business Name? 7 Issues” by Jeff Wuorio
http://tinyurl.com/2rmmqd/
 
7

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Jim - Posted on January 31, 2007
I was one of those folks who, on the day Macy's announced the name change, e-mailed the company with my opinion of what they were contemplating. I received back a polite e-mail to the effect of, "thank you, but we know what we're doing and our decision is final." So was mine--I have since not stepped into a Macy's store (although MF had been my "standard, go-to" store for decades) and have no plans to do so ever again.

Now, that being said, MF was sold because sales were stagnant. From one perspective, if more people really cared that much about MF then they should have voted with their $$$ and made a sale unnecessary. However, Macy?s buying and then re-branding the chain appears to not have been the medicine for what ailed MF. After all, the First Rule of Holes is: "when you are in one, stop digging!" Going from stagnant sales to losses isn't a step in the right direction.
Donna Lendvay - Posted on January 24, 2007
I find it fascinating the Tata Group would pay $170 million for the building and not include the rights to the name. From this I can only wonder what the Millennium Partners wanted to charge for THAT piece of the pie? Wow, c'mon - what was the price? And who could have possibly convinced the Tata group to buy one without the other? These are smart people? I am checking with my financial planner tonight to make sure I am not invested in them!(But I sure would like to know who the salesperson was...I gotta bridge to sell!)
Phil - Posted on January 24, 2007
Regarding Marin Alsop, critical opinion really is divided on her musicianship. Some of us here in Baltimore are not impressed at all (BSO members included), and would love to send her up to Philadelphia if we could - with our best wishes, of course! BTW, for some really good music-making, JoAnn Falletta is working wonders with the Buffalo Philharmonic, and programming some extremely interesting musical material.
Adelino de Almeida - Posted on January 23, 2007
And some of the name changes are not particularly inspiring: the Taj Mahal is a mausoleum... why would anyone want to stay at a hotel named after a mausoleum? Is the implication that the hotel will provide "eternal rest"?

adelino.typepad.com
Edwin S Peters II - Posted on January 23, 2007
It just goes to show you over and over again how most businesses fail to truly acknowledge the needs of the customer and thier value. The present state of American business is one where the business feels the customer is there for their needs, not the other way as it should be. I am in a service industry just as most now adays are, I work for a mortgage company and real estate company and we fully understand we dont have a true product to sell we have a service and that service demands that we are at the top of our game for the needs of our customers or we wouldnt be here at all. if you open your eyes you will see, If you open your ears you will hear... if you close them to the world where your money comes from it's your own doing when its dark and lonely in your office
Max - Posted on January 23, 2007
They should have just named it the Taj Ritz Carlton. :-)
Meryl Steinberg - Posted on January 23, 2007
Denny, I grew up in Chicago and have fond memories of Marshall Fields. 60,000 signatues? The folly of the Macy's group in the face of this opposition is astonishing. Their arrogance and poor judgement--defying the common will and/or the common good is reflected in many decisions made in business and government today. Perhaps your article would give pause to the President of the U.S. as he tries to bulldoze escalation of the war in spite of extensive Congressional and popular oppostion.
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Jim - Posted on January 31, 2007
I was one of those folks who, on the day Macy's announced the name change, e-mailed the company with my opinion of what they were contemplating. I received back a polite e-mail to the effect of, "thank you, but we know what we're doing and our decision is final." So was mine--I have since not stepped into a Macy's store (although MF had been my "standard, go-to" store for decades) and have no plans to do so ever again.

Now, that being said, MF was sold because sales were stagnant. From one perspective, if more people really cared that much about MF then they should have voted with their $$$ and made a sale unnecessary. However, Macy?s buying and then re-branding the chain appears to not have been the medicine for what ailed MF. After all, the First Rule of Holes is: "when you are in one, stop digging!" Going from stagnant sales to losses isn't a step in the right direction.
Donna Lendvay - Posted on January 24, 2007
I find it fascinating the Tata Group would pay $170 million for the building and not include the rights to the name. From this I can only wonder what the Millennium Partners wanted to charge for THAT piece of the pie? Wow, c'mon - what was the price? And who could have possibly convinced the Tata group to buy one without the other? These are smart people? I am checking with my financial planner tonight to make sure I am not invested in them!(But I sure would like to know who the salesperson was...I gotta bridge to sell!)
Phil - Posted on January 24, 2007
Regarding Marin Alsop, critical opinion really is divided on her musicianship. Some of us here in Baltimore are not impressed at all (BSO members included), and would love to send her up to Philadelphia if we could - with our best wishes, of course! BTW, for some really good music-making, JoAnn Falletta is working wonders with the Buffalo Philharmonic, and programming some extremely interesting musical material.
Adelino de Almeida - Posted on January 23, 2007
And some of the name changes are not particularly inspiring: the Taj Mahal is a mausoleum... why would anyone want to stay at a hotel named after a mausoleum? Is the implication that the hotel will provide "eternal rest"?

adelino.typepad.com
Edwin S Peters II - Posted on January 23, 2007
It just goes to show you over and over again how most businesses fail to truly acknowledge the needs of the customer and thier value. The present state of American business is one where the business feels the customer is there for their needs, not the other way as it should be. I am in a service industry just as most now adays are, I work for a mortgage company and real estate company and we fully understand we dont have a true product to sell we have a service and that service demands that we are at the top of our game for the needs of our customers or we wouldnt be here at all. if you open your eyes you will see, If you open your ears you will hear... if you close them to the world where your money comes from it's your own doing when its dark and lonely in your office
Max - Posted on January 23, 2007
They should have just named it the Taj Ritz Carlton. :-)
Meryl Steinberg - Posted on January 23, 2007
Denny, I grew up in Chicago and have fond memories of Marshall Fields. 60,000 signatues? The folly of the Macy's group in the face of this opposition is astonishing. Their arrogance and poor judgement--defying the common will and/or the common good is reflected in many decisions made in business and government today. Perhaps your article would give pause to the President of the U.S. as he tries to bulldoze escalation of the war in spite of extensive Congressional and popular oppostion.