Target Marketing

You will be automatically redirected to targetmarketingmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

The Newest Junk Mail Hater

A fatuous business model based on creating anger

September 2007 By Denny Hatch
15
Get the Flash Player to see this rotator.
 

In the News

For-Profit Crusade Against Junk Mail
PALO ALTO, Calif. — Pankaj Shah may be the only chief executive in Silicon Valley striving to put himself out of business. He is the founder of GreenDimes, a small business with big plans to stop junk mail while aiding the environment. If Mr. Shah has his way, millions of tons of unwanted mail will go the way of pesky phone solicitations. And the planet, not just consumers, he says, will reap the rewards. GreenDimes is one of several companies nationwide begun in recent years to organize information about a customer’s unsolicited credit card offers and money mailers, or no longer desired catalogs, and then perform the legwork to halt the flow.
—Laura Novak, The New York Times, September 6, 2007
Let’s get this out on the table right now—I love junk mail.

Compared to spam—the ultimate time sucker—a little daily junk mail (which can be opened over the recycling bin) is dream stuff.

And. by the way, I love the term, “junk mail.”

Years back, any mention of the term “junk mail” in the media brought huffy letters from members of the direct marketing community demanding an apology from the offender.

When the great West Coast copywriter, the late Bill Jayme, was asked what he did for a living. “I write direct mail solicitations for magazines,” he said, “such as Atlantic Monthly, BusinessWeek, Civilization, American Heritage and many others. High-class junk mail. I call it ‘junque mail.’”

Jayme went on to say people love junk mail—and junk.

“Vintage car buffs love junk yards,” Jayme once said to me. “Antique collectors love junk shops. For a brief period, Wall Street had a love affair with junk bonds. Vacationers love to head for the Caribbean with a pile of junk fiction. And what would a Hong Kong fisherman be without his j**k?”

General agencies hate direct mail because it is accountable and for years have tried to persuade their clients that it is the ugly little step-sibling of advertising.

Junk mail—direct mail—is in fact the aristocrat of advertising.

Pankaj Shah’s Master Plan
Pankaj Shah is founder and CEO of GreenDimes, a company that is hoping to put direct mailers out of business by generating anger at unwanted mail and its alleged destruction of trees and damage to the environment.

One of Shah’s citations is the WildWest Institute’s statistic that 100 million trees are destroyed each year to produce 4.5 million tons of junk mail, with 44 percent of that thrown away unopened.

(For the record, more than 90% is thrown away unopened.)

According to the crawl on Shah’s Web site, he has stopped 1.6 million pounds of junk mail, planted 320,000 trees and saved $4 million gallons of water.

Shah—with 50,000 members and 16 employees—has a dream: to stop 95% of all junk mail.

Actor Matt Damon, who sits on Shah’s board, did the talk show circuit to promote the GreenDimes Web site. Included on his rounds: “Oprah,” who mails tons of junk mail solicitations to get subscribers to the magazine that bears her name.

Takeaway Points to Consider:

* Direct mail is the aristocrat of advertising.

* Direct mail is the only way to economically talk to your customers that is (1) guaranteed to reach all of them, including those sans Internet access and (2) guaranteed not to be inadvertently deleted amidst the avalanche of Spam.

* With the Can Spam Act and the Do-Not-Call Registry, direct mail is once again the workhorse of direct marketing.

* If you do not have an in-house expert or a consultant that is familiar with every aspect of direct mail, hire one or the other—or both.

* Direct mail is the only advertising medium with a broad and varied enough palette to successfully sell highly complex products and services.

* Without junk mail, the Postal Service would be virtually out of business and the cost of a First-Class stamp would be somewhere between $5 and $10.

* According to the Direct Marketing Association, every $5.60 spent on direct mail generates an average of $70 in sales.

* In the international marketplace where theft and piracy are rampant, direct mail is the best secret medium to use for testing the efficacy of a new product or service.

Web Sites Related to Today's Edition:

“For-Profit Crusade Against Junk Mail,” The New York Times
http://tinyurl.com/2yzcxd

Pankaj Shah’s GreenDimes organization
http://www.greendimes.com/

American Forest & Paper Association
http://www.afandpa.org/
 
15

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
S. Lyons - Posted on February 05, 2008
As a consumer, I have a vastly different perspective on Green Dimes. Junk mail is theft. It's the theft of my time. Green Dimes lets me lock the mailbox door and keep the time thieves out.

The way I see it, direct marketing pieces are incredibly intrusive. They show up at my home unannounced and oftentimes, unrequested, and force me to deal with them. I don't want to spend 5-10 minutes sorting out the unwanted catalogs into the recycling, shredding the credit card offers, and occasionally mistaking a piece of real mail that I care deeply about for junk. I adore the fact that I can easily use a service like Green Dimes to reclaim time. If I save 5 minutes a day, which I've easily done at this point, each week that gives me more than half an hour to do something interesting and compelling.

Given that I flat out refuse to purchase a product that is marketed to me in an unsolicited catalog, I think I'm saving time, money, and the environment simultaniously.
jay - Posted on September 18, 2007
Call me a cynic, but it seems to me that one of the most obvious answers to the reason for this movement, for the creation of GreenDimes specifically, may be financial. Mr. Shah is in business to help the world 'a little at a time' it says on their website. Very noble. Look at the site a touch longer and you'll notice a healthy dose of retail push, for both gifts and referrals. Merchandising, albeit with green goods, underlies the basic structure of the site. And we all know viral is profitable, but then again Direct Response taught us that.
Clyde Goulet - Posted on September 14, 2007
Great read Denny,

Please don't stop my "junk" mail, how else will I build my swipe file.

Read somewhere that there are more trees growing today, than were here when Columbus discovered America. Also not sure who counted them when Christopher got here either.
Bob Martel - Posted on September 13, 2007
Denny,

Others have already shared their intellectual perspectives...

I have another thought.

We should ALL send Mr. Shah a "junk" letter... expressing ourt thoughts about his plan.

Bob Martel

Wash Phillips - Posted on September 13, 2007
Comment on Ms. Lambert's view of the paperless ad world of the future...
1. Who predicted the paperless office? Look around. It's like those predictions on the covers of PopSci and MechIllustrated?the kind of Buck Rogers nonsense found in a neat volume called "Follies of Science."
2. Many erroneously think "direct respsonse" is done electronically, now. Just ask Google. But if the analog fits, then my bulk (spam) file of utterly disposable messages (I never ever look at) should be equivalent to the stuff I never look at in newspapers, TV, bus cards, billboards, etc.. It far exceeds the printed mail I toss away--ususally after having at least looked.
3. The so-called "model T" state of targeting clientele is the major failing of ALL direct response--electronic and printed. There would be ZERO "junk" if every messaged received appealed to you personally--devoutly to be wished in advertising, where self-selection is vital. That's the real ?rocket science of marketing" but yet just a dream...
4. I have multiple email addresses, but can hardly keep up with one, ignoring the others for long periods. A time-sensitive sales message would be lost on me there. And the quest for many is a single phone # for multiple lines and pronto access therefrom.
5. Of course everyone asks for one's email address.That's what fills my bulk email box. For free magazines, your email address adds to the subscription base so they can cite a strong readership--to pay for print ads in the book.
6. Testing product appeal below the offshore radar is a great idea, Denny. You could also mention the costs savings of "smart" direct response in the B2B world to invite sales calls that are truly "appointments," cutting costs for personal sales calls, And even letting customers know in a personalized way you haven?t forgotten them.

Paul Bobnak - Posted on September 12, 2007
I've had this discussion with more than a few people over the past several years. I almost always finish with my trump card: your story (w/attribution) about how you challenged the talk show host to tear out every ad in the Chicago Sun-Times that didn't appeal to her, then lecture about the environment. Works every time.
Sid Bursten - Posted on September 11, 2007
Lee Marc Stein makes an excellent point when he says"Direct mail is Junk Mail only when it lacks relevance. Databases and modeling allow us to be more relevant than ever."
Modern technology (including our newly patented VariCat System that automatically generates customized catalogs for each frequent customer featuring exactly the items most likely to appeal to that buyer) now makes one-to-one marketing not only possible but highly profitable.
Not only that, but by eliminating items the customer never buys and featuring only those of maximum interest, pages (and trees) can be saved.
Jerry Heisler - Posted on September 11, 2007
Wonderful article. In the seminars that I presented for the United States Postal Service I always answered the frequent "junk mail" question with the comment....my very large recycle bin normally has about 50 pieces of mail in a week and the rest of the can is filled with newspapers. Now who is wasting the trees?
Karla Jo Helms - Posted on September 11, 2007
Great article - I read the New York Times article when it came out and I, too, love junk mail. Shah spouts off statistical generalities which make it seem like there are large numbers of junk mail haters, but the actual $700 billion in sales from direct mail efforts speaks for itself.
Mike Mccormick - Posted on September 11, 2007
Hi Denny, Pankaj Shah (P.S. - doncha love it?) has apparently never heard of recycling. If he wants to save the earth by saving paper, perhaps he should go after the biggest waste of paper I know of, the NYT. I wonder if he makes his list of 50M members available to major mailers so we can save paper by not mailing to them. I wonder if he's told his members that the best way to get hardly any direct mail is to never, ever respond. Mike McC
Alison Taylor - Posted on September 11, 2007
WOW! I had no idea the industry planted so many trees. That, and your other facts make me appreciate my "junk mail" a lot more now.

And you bring up a good point - there are plenty of other industries that consume paper. Do we know how many trees are consumed to produce all the toilet paper, paper towels, cups, napkins, boxes, throw-away diapers, airline and movie tickets, and shopping bags? What are they doing to plant trees? How come no one is mad about that?
Ross Turney - Posted on September 11, 2007
Brilliant Denny, as usual.
Years ago I recall reading many of Bill Jayme's control packages and they were brilliant too.
I used to work in the marketing department of one of the large Canadian banks. My background was direct. Others were from general. Direct and general eventually merged/consolidated. I think those from direct fared better in the integrated world than the general people. In the meantime, marketing budgets made a major shift to direct response, much to the chagrin of the general agency. I think primarily that it was accountable, and to the MBA?s and bean counters, they could understand that, not to mention that it was the right thing to do too.
David Rosen - Posted on September 11, 2007
Excellent column, Denny. Frankly, I'm puzzled . . . by people who get so bent out of shape by this terrible scourge of unsolicited advertising mail, muttering in a dire monotone "I see...dead trees!" And also by those direct marketers who are defensive about it. Hey -- remember "Only junk people call it junk mail?"That slogan always struck me as a particularly puerile (and unnecessary) attempt at image-building. I'm in favor of a counter-campaign to Green Dimes, see if we can license the image of Bart Simpson or one of the South Park gang, and put him in a T-Shirt that says: Junk Mailer and Proud of It!
Lee Marc Stein - Posted on September 11, 2007
Denny,
Fabulous post! It was great to see the Jayme mailing for the DMAA. A few points --
- Direct mail is Junk Mail only when it lacks relevance. Databases and modeling allow us to be more relevant than ever.
- In B2B, direct mail becomes a relief to prospects and customers besieged by emails and other new media.
- Consumers don't care very much any more about empty mailboxes. Email, text messages, etc. keep them from being lonely.
Valerie Lambert - Posted on September 11, 2007
In another generation, though, direct mail, postage and paper will be on its way out and ?DIRECT mail? will be done electronically. We have the model T in terms of really targeting our clientele electronically. You want to talk about ?the rocket science of marketing??

A recent survey among my Annual Giving fund raising User Group bears out what recent studies are saying: more and more people have multiple e-mails, just as they have multiple phone numbers. E-mail addresses are being designated for various purposes. (e.g., work, home, marketing/spam, job hunting, etc.)

Free subscriptions to online newspapers require name and e-mail address for a reason. Most things will be paperless?the ?cost? is contact information ? whittled down to demographic data?as much as possible for a truly targeted approach.

If you?re a marketer, you?d better know about databases or you won?t HAVE a future!
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
S. Lyons - Posted on February 05, 2008
As a consumer, I have a vastly different perspective on Green Dimes. Junk mail is theft. It's the theft of my time. Green Dimes lets me lock the mailbox door and keep the time thieves out.

The way I see it, direct marketing pieces are incredibly intrusive. They show up at my home unannounced and oftentimes, unrequested, and force me to deal with them. I don't want to spend 5-10 minutes sorting out the unwanted catalogs into the recycling, shredding the credit card offers, and occasionally mistaking a piece of real mail that I care deeply about for junk. I adore the fact that I can easily use a service like Green Dimes to reclaim time. If I save 5 minutes a day, which I've easily done at this point, each week that gives me more than half an hour to do something interesting and compelling.

Given that I flat out refuse to purchase a product that is marketed to me in an unsolicited catalog, I think I'm saving time, money, and the environment simultaniously.
jay - Posted on September 18, 2007
Call me a cynic, but it seems to me that one of the most obvious answers to the reason for this movement, for the creation of GreenDimes specifically, may be financial. Mr. Shah is in business to help the world 'a little at a time' it says on their website. Very noble. Look at the site a touch longer and you'll notice a healthy dose of retail push, for both gifts and referrals. Merchandising, albeit with green goods, underlies the basic structure of the site. And we all know viral is profitable, but then again Direct Response taught us that.
Clyde Goulet - Posted on September 14, 2007
Great read Denny,

Please don't stop my "junk" mail, how else will I build my swipe file.

Read somewhere that there are more trees growing today, than were here when Columbus discovered America. Also not sure who counted them when Christopher got here either.
Bob Martel - Posted on September 13, 2007
Denny,

Others have already shared their intellectual perspectives...

I have another thought.

We should ALL send Mr. Shah a "junk" letter... expressing ourt thoughts about his plan.

Bob Martel

Wash Phillips - Posted on September 13, 2007
Comment on Ms. Lambert's view of the paperless ad world of the future...
1. Who predicted the paperless office? Look around. It's like those predictions on the covers of PopSci and MechIllustrated?the kind of Buck Rogers nonsense found in a neat volume called "Follies of Science."
2. Many erroneously think "direct respsonse" is done electronically, now. Just ask Google. But if the analog fits, then my bulk (spam) file of utterly disposable messages (I never ever look at) should be equivalent to the stuff I never look at in newspapers, TV, bus cards, billboards, etc.. It far exceeds the printed mail I toss away--ususally after having at least looked.
3. The so-called "model T" state of targeting clientele is the major failing of ALL direct response--electronic and printed. There would be ZERO "junk" if every messaged received appealed to you personally--devoutly to be wished in advertising, where self-selection is vital. That's the real ?rocket science of marketing" but yet just a dream...
4. I have multiple email addresses, but can hardly keep up with one, ignoring the others for long periods. A time-sensitive sales message would be lost on me there. And the quest for many is a single phone # for multiple lines and pronto access therefrom.
5. Of course everyone asks for one's email address.That's what fills my bulk email box. For free magazines, your email address adds to the subscription base so they can cite a strong readership--to pay for print ads in the book.
6. Testing product appeal below the offshore radar is a great idea, Denny. You could also mention the costs savings of "smart" direct response in the B2B world to invite sales calls that are truly "appointments," cutting costs for personal sales calls, And even letting customers know in a personalized way you haven?t forgotten them.

Paul Bobnak - Posted on September 12, 2007
I've had this discussion with more than a few people over the past several years. I almost always finish with my trump card: your story (w/attribution) about how you challenged the talk show host to tear out every ad in the Chicago Sun-Times that didn't appeal to her, then lecture about the environment. Works every time.
Sid Bursten - Posted on September 11, 2007
Lee Marc Stein makes an excellent point when he says"Direct mail is Junk Mail only when it lacks relevance. Databases and modeling allow us to be more relevant than ever."
Modern technology (including our newly patented VariCat System that automatically generates customized catalogs for each frequent customer featuring exactly the items most likely to appeal to that buyer) now makes one-to-one marketing not only possible but highly profitable.
Not only that, but by eliminating items the customer never buys and featuring only those of maximum interest, pages (and trees) can be saved.
Jerry Heisler - Posted on September 11, 2007
Wonderful article. In the seminars that I presented for the United States Postal Service I always answered the frequent "junk mail" question with the comment....my very large recycle bin normally has about 50 pieces of mail in a week and the rest of the can is filled with newspapers. Now who is wasting the trees?
Karla Jo Helms - Posted on September 11, 2007
Great article - I read the New York Times article when it came out and I, too, love junk mail. Shah spouts off statistical generalities which make it seem like there are large numbers of junk mail haters, but the actual $700 billion in sales from direct mail efforts speaks for itself.
Mike Mccormick - Posted on September 11, 2007
Hi Denny, Pankaj Shah (P.S. - doncha love it?) has apparently never heard of recycling. If he wants to save the earth by saving paper, perhaps he should go after the biggest waste of paper I know of, the NYT. I wonder if he makes his list of 50M members available to major mailers so we can save paper by not mailing to them. I wonder if he's told his members that the best way to get hardly any direct mail is to never, ever respond. Mike McC
Alison Taylor - Posted on September 11, 2007
WOW! I had no idea the industry planted so many trees. That, and your other facts make me appreciate my "junk mail" a lot more now.

And you bring up a good point - there are plenty of other industries that consume paper. Do we know how many trees are consumed to produce all the toilet paper, paper towels, cups, napkins, boxes, throw-away diapers, airline and movie tickets, and shopping bags? What are they doing to plant trees? How come no one is mad about that?
Ross Turney - Posted on September 11, 2007
Brilliant Denny, as usual.
Years ago I recall reading many of Bill Jayme's control packages and they were brilliant too.
I used to work in the marketing department of one of the large Canadian banks. My background was direct. Others were from general. Direct and general eventually merged/consolidated. I think those from direct fared better in the integrated world than the general people. In the meantime, marketing budgets made a major shift to direct response, much to the chagrin of the general agency. I think primarily that it was accountable, and to the MBA?s and bean counters, they could understand that, not to mention that it was the right thing to do too.
David Rosen - Posted on September 11, 2007
Excellent column, Denny. Frankly, I'm puzzled . . . by people who get so bent out of shape by this terrible scourge of unsolicited advertising mail, muttering in a dire monotone "I see...dead trees!" And also by those direct marketers who are defensive about it. Hey -- remember "Only junk people call it junk mail?"That slogan always struck me as a particularly puerile (and unnecessary) attempt at image-building. I'm in favor of a counter-campaign to Green Dimes, see if we can license the image of Bart Simpson or one of the South Park gang, and put him in a T-Shirt that says: Junk Mailer and Proud of It!
Lee Marc Stein - Posted on September 11, 2007
Denny,
Fabulous post! It was great to see the Jayme mailing for the DMAA. A few points --
- Direct mail is Junk Mail only when it lacks relevance. Databases and modeling allow us to be more relevant than ever.
- In B2B, direct mail becomes a relief to prospects and customers besieged by emails and other new media.
- Consumers don't care very much any more about empty mailboxes. Email, text messages, etc. keep them from being lonely.
Valerie Lambert - Posted on September 11, 2007
In another generation, though, direct mail, postage and paper will be on its way out and ?DIRECT mail? will be done electronically. We have the model T in terms of really targeting our clientele electronically. You want to talk about ?the rocket science of marketing??

A recent survey among my Annual Giving fund raising User Group bears out what recent studies are saying: more and more people have multiple e-mails, just as they have multiple phone numbers. E-mail addresses are being designated for various purposes. (e.g., work, home, marketing/spam, job hunting, etc.)

Free subscriptions to online newspapers require name and e-mail address for a reason. Most things will be paperless?the ?cost? is contact information ? whittled down to demographic data?as much as possible for a truly targeted approach.

If you?re a marketer, you?d better know about databases or you won?t HAVE a future!